Case law

Horack v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

955 A.2d 1010 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 26, 2008

LTV Steel Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

562 Pa. 205 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 19, 2000

The Commonwealth Court affirmed the Order of the Board. LTV Steel, Inc. v. W.C.A.B. (Mozena), 727 A.2d 160 (Pa.Cmwlth.1999). Relying largely on its decision in USX Corp. v. W.C.A.B. … . § 1922(5); Gardner v. Erie Insurance Company, 555 Pa. 59 , 722 A.2d 1041, 1047 (1999); Harper & Collins v. W.C.A.B. (Brown), 543 Pa. 484 , 672 A.2d 1319, 1321 (1996).

St. Joseph's Hospital v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

473 Pa. 101 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 3, 1977

PLRB v. Ficon, 434 Pa. 383 , 254 A.2d 3 (1969). … As we stated in Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v.

Dockins v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

934 A.2d 700 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 2007

AND NOW, this 21st day of November, 2007, because in sustaining the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole’s preliminary objections, the Commonwealth Court did not address Appellant’s argument that the requirement that

Dockins v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

594 Pa. 26 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 2007

AND NOW, this 21st day of November, 2007, because in sustaining the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole’s preliminary objections, the Commonwealth Court did not address Appellant’s argument that the requirement that

Smarr v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

569 Pa. 231 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 5, 2002

Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

537 Pa. 32 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1994

Kachinski v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 516 Pa. 240 , 532 A.2d 374 (1987); Petrone v. Moffat Coal Company, 427 Pa. 5 , 233 A.2d 891 (1967); Unora v. … In Petrone v.

Banner v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

598 Pa. 184 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 13, 2008

United Laundries, Inc. v. Board of Property Assessment

359 Pa. 195 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 1948

In other words, the Board argues that because of the so-called “assembled industrial plant doctrine”, as enunciated in Titus v. Poland Coal Co., 275 Pa. 431 , 119 A. 540 ; Commonwealth Trust Co. of Pittsburgh v. … This Court said, in Titus v.

Bivins v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

596 Pa. 575 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 30, 2008

Gribschaw v. PA. Board of Probation & Parole

610 Pa. 570 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 2011

Miller v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

505 Pa. 8 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 25, 1984

He then filed an appeal with the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review. The Board affirmed the referee’s decision on August 18, 1982. … Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Jolliffe, 474 Pa. 584 , 379 A.2d 109 (1977); Lattanzio v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 461 Pa. 392 , 336 A.2d 595 (1975).

Podobensky v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

905 A.2d 917 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 23, 2006

Feight v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

905 A.2d 916 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 21, 2006

Curry v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

588 Pa. 535 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 21, 2006

Curry v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

905 A.2d 916 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 21, 2006

Horton v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

597 Pa. 51 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 8, 2008

Borough of Pottstown v. Pennsylvania Municipal Retirement Board

551 Pa. 605 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 19, 1998

This case is distinguishable from Lopata v. … State Water Resources Control Bd. v.

Kotzin v. Plymouth Township Zoning Board of Adjustment

395 Pa. 125 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1959

We cannot find that this decision was a manifest abuse of the board’s discretion. … That the operation of the enterprise is by a nonprofit corporation, and hence noncommercial is not determinative of the board’s action.

City of Pittsburgh v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

522 Pa. 44 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 5, 1989

Filanowski *55 v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 439 Pa. 360 , 266 A.2d 670 (1970); J.B. Simon & Co. v. … Compare Silver v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 435 Pa. 99 , 255 A.2d 506 (1969), with Immordino v. Morrisville Zoning Hearing Board, 65 Pa.Cmwlth. 79 , 441 A.2d 818 (1982).