Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspa

10,000+ results

0.73s

  • Musiolowski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    524 Pa. 246 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 21, 1990

    ORDER PER CURIAM: Case remanded to Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board for further medical testimony in accordance with the standard expressed in McCloskey v. … Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 501 Pa. 93 , 460 A.2d 237 (1983). McDERMOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Glen-Gery Corp. v. Zoning Hearing Board

    589 Pa. 135 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 2006

    The Board relied on the decision of the Commonwealth Court in Schadler v. … See Propst v.

    Superseded by statute, as recognized in Messina v. East Penn TownshipCited 49 timesPublished
  • Peter S. Pool & Son ex rel. Brown v. White

    171 Pa. 500 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 1895

    Brown, Assignee, v. James White, Appellant. Practice, S. C.—Assignments of error—Charge—Points—Bill of exceptions. … In Janney v.

    Cited 7 timesPublishedText from a scan
  • Rogers v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    555 Pa. 285 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 22, 1999

    Reider v. … Sparks v.

    Cited 117 timesPublished
  • Powell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    638 Pa. 558 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 2017

    See Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. … Slater v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Fink v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

    551 Pa. 432 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 10, 1998

    The order of the Commonwealth Court is REVERSED and the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board is REINSTATED. See Bethlehem Steel Corp v. … Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Baxter), 550 Pa. 658 , 708 A.2d 801 (1998). *433 The Petition to File Post-Submission Communication is DENIED.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kelly v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    598 Pa. 539 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 2008

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lancaster County v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board

    633 Pa. 294 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 27, 2015

    See id. at 1111 (citing Vulcan Basement Waterproofing v. NLRB, 219 F.3d 677 (7th Cir.2000); Jim Walter Resources, Inc. v. NLRB, 177 F.3d 961 (11th Cir.1999); Pioneer Natural Gas Co. v. … Lancaster County v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Muretic v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    599 Pa. 533 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 2009

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Young v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    592 Pa. 40 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 31, 2007

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public Education

    453 Pa. 584 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · May 23, 1973

    Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public Education, 223 Pa. … Municipal University of Omaha, supra; Brown v. City of Omaha, supra; Parish v. Pitts, supra; Veach v. City of Phoenix, supra; Haney v. City of Lexington, supra; Sherbutte v. Marine City, supra; Rice v.

    Overruled on other grounds by Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of Highways, 479 Pa. 384 (1978)Cited 317 timesPublished
  • Evans v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation

    580 Pa. 550 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 15, 2004

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Elberson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    596 Pa. 463 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 2008

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fleming v. Prospect Park Board of Adjustment

    318 Pa. 582 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1935

    Per Curiam, This is an appeal from a decree of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County affirming the action of the Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Prospect Park in refusing to issue to Veronica L. … This is not sufficient to warrant interference by us in a matter which was, in any event, primarily one of discretion with the board of adjustment.

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Kramer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

    573 Pa. 32 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 3, 2003

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Deiss v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

    475 Pa. 547 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 23, 1977

    Eckenrod [v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review], 15 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 166 [ 325 A.2d 320 ] (1974), N. 3. See Elshinnawy v. … Lego v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review [24] Pa.Commonwealth Ct. [569], 357 A.2d 701 (1976).

    Cited 106 timesPublished
  • Deitch Co. v. Board of Property Assessment

    417 Pa. 213 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 25, 1965

    In Siegal v. … Siegal v.

    Cited 183 timesPublished
  • Khan v. State Board of Auctioneer Examiners

    577 Pa. 166 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 20, 2004

    Kahn v. … Agency, Inc. v.

    Cited 87 timesPublished
  • Brown v. T. W. Phillips Gas and Oil Co.

    365 Pa. 155 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 1950

    Allegheny County Board of Property Assessment, etc., 353 Pa. 49, 52 , 44 A. 2d 250 . The action of a lower court in such connection is reviewable only for an abuse of discretion: see Davis v. … In Mechanics’ Bank, etc., v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Finnegan v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

    576 Pa. 59 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 18, 2003

    See Rogers v. Penns. Bd. of Prob. and Parole, 555 Pa. 285 , 724 A.2d 319, 321 (1999). Nor is the Board required to grant parole; it has broad discretion in parole matters. Id.; see also Commonwealth v. … See Prater v. U.S.

    Overruled in part by Cimaszewski v. Bd. of Probation and Parole, 582 Pa. 27 (2005)Cited 26 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.