Opinion

Musiolowski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

  • 524 Pa. 246
  • 570 A.2d 1319
  • 1990 Pa. LEXIS 75
Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Filed
Mar 21, 1990
Status
Published
On the bench
Cappy, Consideration, Flaherty, Larsen, McDermott, Nix, Papadakos, Zappala
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 64.5%

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Case remanded to Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board for further medical testimony in accordance with the standard expressed in McCloskey v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 501 Pa. 93 , 460 A.2d 237 (1983).

McDERMOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.