Case law

Conklin

District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 12, 2026

Aqueduct & Sewer Auth. v. Metcalf, 506 U.S. 139, 144 (1993). Medical boards are a “state agency” for immunity purposes. Bondick v. … Oregon Medical Board, et al., 3:25-cv-01173-AR v. Infinity Cap.

Thompson v. Tualatin Hills Park & Recreation District

496 F. Supp. 530 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 28, 1980

Healthy City Board of Ed. v. … Healthy City Board of Ed. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 278-279 , 97 S.Ct. 568, 571-572 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977). 4 . See, e. g., Agin v.

Oregon Laborers-Employers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.

188 F.R.D. 365 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 1, 1998

Similarly, Valentino v. … Systems and Daikon Shield, plaintiffs here allege that defendants’ tobacco products cause across-the-board addiction and have across-the-board • adverse health consequences.

Jackson v. Surber

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 13, 2024

See Gardner v. Brown, No. 2:21-cv-1256-SB, 2024 WL 1155381, at *6 (D. Or. … Maney v. Brown, 91 F.4th 1296, 1298 (9th Cir. 2024) (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 247d-6d(a)(1)).

Robertson v. City of Salem

191 F. Supp. 604 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 1, 1961

Board of Commissioners of State Institutions v. Tallahassee Bank & Trust Co., Fla.App.1958, 108 So.2d 74 ; Kissinger v. City of Los Angeles, 1958, 161 Cal. … Board of Commissioners of State Institutions v. Tallahassee Bank & Trust Co., supra; Kissinger v. City of Los Angeles, supra; Robyns v. City of Dearborn, 1954, 341 Mich. 495 , 67 N.W.2d 718 ; State ex rel. Tingley v.

Hammond v. HOUSING AUTHORITY AND URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF LANE CTY.

328 F. Supp. 586 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 2, 1971

See Colon v. Tompkins Square Neighbors, Inc., 294 F.Supp. 134 (S.D.N.Y.1968). … Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 , 89 S.Ct. 1322 , 22 L.Ed.2d 600 (1969); Colon v. Tompkins Square Neighbors, Inc., 294 F.Supp. 134, 138 (S.D.N.Y.1968).

United States v. Coverstone

152 F. Supp. 2d 1231 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 7, 2001

OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. This action comes before the Court on Defendant’s oral Motion for Judgment of Acquittal on Count Four of the Indictment. … See United States v. Davis, 876 F.2d 71, 73 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 866 , 110 S.Ct. 188 , 107 L.Ed.2d 143 (1989) (quoting United States v.

Calmar Steamship Corp. v. W. J. Jones & Son, Inc.

163 F. Supp. 463 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 13, 1958

The law of this matter is delineated by Ryan-Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic S. S. Corp., 350 U.S. 124 , 76 S.Ct. 232 , 100 L.Ed. 133 , and American President Lines v. … This conclusion invokes the rule of Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic S. S. Corp., supra, 76 S.Ct. at page 234 , and American President Lines v.

Santella v. Grizzly Industrial, Inc.

286 F.R.D. 478 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 26, 2012

U.S. v. Ruehle, 583 F.3d 600, 607 (9th Cir.2009) (quoting U.S. v. Bauer, 132 F.3d 504 , 507 (9th Cir.1997)) (internal quotations omitted). The privilege, however, is strictly construed. Id. (citing U.S. v. … Americas, 605 F.3d 1373, 1378-79 (Fed.Cir.2010); Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp., 960 F.2d 1465 , 1470-71 (9th Cir.1992); see also Telular Corp. v. Vox2, Inc., No. 00-C-6144, 2001 WL 641188 (N.D.Ill.

deBarros v. Walmart Stores, Inc.

857 F. Supp. 2d 1109 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 9, 2012

Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 , 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007). See also, Litchfield v. … Johnson v. Brown, 193 Or.App. 375, 380 , 91 P.3d 741 (2004). The case at bar is neither a tort nor a defamation case.

Myers

District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 7, 2026

DESCHUTES COUNTY, OREGON, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon; and BOARD OF COUNTY … See Rizzo v.

American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers v. O'Keeffe

134 F. Supp. 3d 1270 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 23, 2015

Defendant-intervenors California Air Resources Board and the State of Washington (collectively “State Intervenors”) separately move to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint with prejudice. … See Allen v.

McKenzie v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 16, 2021

Brown _______________________________ Anna J. … Brown United States Senior District Judge

Willis v. Multnomah County Sheriffs Office

District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 24, 2022

Of Ed. v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 280 (1977); Board of Cty. Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997). The constitutionality of post-arrest incarceration is analyzed under the Fourteenth Amendment. … See Lee v.

Twine v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 10, 2021

Attorney fees will be paid to Plaintiffs attorney, dependent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. … Brown Anna J. Brown United States Senior District Judge

Scott v. United States

225 F. Supp. 257 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 1, 1963

Wenker v. Landon, 161 Or. 265 , 88 P.2d 971 ; Dahlhammer & Roelfs v. Schneider, 197 Or. 478 , 252 P.2d 807 ; Schomp v. Brown, 215 Or. 714 , 335 P.2d 847 , and on re-hearing 337 P.2d 358 . … Other cases recognizing the general principles of law announced in Campbell v. Lake, supra, are Riddell v. Guggenheim, 281 F.2d 836 (9 Cir. 1960); In re John Sidney Thompson, 22 T.C. 275 (1954); and In re Jerome A.

General Teamsters Local 162 v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers

579 F. Supp. 335 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 14, 1981

Pursuant to Article XII, Section 12 of the constitution of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 81 presented this dispute to the Executive Board of the Joint Council of Teamsters No. 37 for resolution. … See Studio Technicians Local 728 v. International Photographers, 598 F.2d 551 (9th Cir.1979).

Hernandez v. Ever Fresh Co.

923 F. Supp. 1305 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 3, 1996

(L2K Farms), are corporations which operate from the same office in Multnomah County, Oregon, with identical boards of directors. Ever Fresh processes fruit. … Patel v. Holley House Motels, 483 F.Supp. 374 (S.D.Ala.1979).

Blakely v. Lisac

357 F. Supp. 255 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 28, 1972

Morris v. Burchard, 51 F.R.D. 530 (S.D.N.Y. 1971); Moscarelli v. Stamm, 288 F. Supp. 453 (E.D.N.Y.1968). … In Anderson v.

Walton v. Laney

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 16, 2021

See Barber v. Wall, 66 F. … Because prison regulations “do not provide a right to an appeal of disciplinary proceedings,” Brown “did not violate a right of [Walton’s] by deciding not to vacate or reopen” Nofziger’s decision. See Woodroffe v.