Case law

Kemper v. MWH Constructors, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon · May 12, 2021

Woodbury v. … Plaintiff has not demonstrated any “convincing evidence” that the Oregon Supreme Court would reject the intermediate appellate court’s decisions in Brown and George.

Daley v. a & S Collection Associates, Inc.

717 F. Supp. 2d 1150 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 7, 2010

Brown Aff., ¶ 3 & Ex. A, p. 1. … Donohue v. Quick Collect, Inc., 592 F.3d 1027, 1033 (9th Cir.2010), quoting Hahn v. Triumph P’ships LLC, 557 F.3d 755, 758 (7th Cir.2009).

McCright v. Beamer

District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 30, 2021

Brown acted with deliberate indifference. Mr. McCright does not set forth 5 — OPINION AND ORDER specific facts that Mr. Brown knew Mr. … Brown’s statement to Ms. McCright could be circumstantial evidence of deliberate indifference. But standing alone, Mr. Brown’s incorrect statement to Mr.

Alexander Manufacturing, Inc. v. Illinois Union Insurance

666 F. Supp. 2d 1185 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 15, 2009

Co. v. … Co. v.

Fields v. Emergency Services Consulting International, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 23, 2024

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, 477 U.S. 242, 250 (1986). … The determination of the Company of the Revenue, as reasonably approved by the Board of Directors of the Company, shall be conclusively binding on the parties.

In re C. O. Pick Co.

9 F.2d 207 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 30, 1925

Guarantee Co. v. Title Co., 224 U. S. 152 -160, 32 S. Ct. 457, 460 ( 56 L. Ed. 706 ). … It has no corporate stocky or stockholders, and no board of directors.

Mentor Graphics Corp. v. Trimeter Technologies Corp.

739 F. Supp. 542 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 12, 1990

Ashe v. Pepsico, Inc., 443 F.Supp. 84, 85 (S.D.N.Y.1977). … These facts are very similar to the facts in Ashe v.

Rookard v. United States

330 F. Supp. 722 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 20, 1971

Gross v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 401 F.2d 600 (9th Cir. 1968). Rookard relies on two Tax Court eases, Dorminey v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 26 T.C. 940 (1956), and Kertes v. Commissioner, T.C. … The written plan adopted by the board of directors of Baxter Motors called for Earle Osborne to subscribe for $5,000 worth of stock.

Hayes v. State of Oregon

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 12, 2020

May 20, 2020); Open Our Oregon v. Brown, 2020 WL 2542861 (D. Or. May 19, 2020); PCG-SP Venture I LLC v. Newsom (C.D. Cal. June 23, 2020); Geller v. De Blasio, 2020 WL 2520711 (S.D.N.Y. … May 3, 2020); Legacy Church, Inc. v. Kunkel, 2020 WL 1905586 (D.N.M. Apr. 17, 2020); Cross Culture Christian Ctr. v. Newsom, 2020 WL 2121111 (E.D. Cal. May 5, 2020); Gish v.

League of Wilderness Defenders—Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. Zielinski

187 F. Supp. 2d 1263 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 25, 2002

board feet of unburned trees from over 900 acres. … Van De Kamp v.

National Wildlife Federation v. Johnson

548 F. Supp. 708 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 10, 1982

It is, of course, within the power of Congress to determine the forum, City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of Tacoma, 357 U.S. 320, 336 , 78 S.Ct. 1209, 1218 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1345 (1958); see also Adamo Wrecking Co. v. U. … In Crown Simpson, the issue was whether the Court of Appeals had jurisdiction over a direct review of EPA’s action in denying certain effluent discharge variances granted by the California State Water Resources Control Board

Van Steene v. Marshall

30 F. Supp. 871 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 20, 1939

Since the percentage of loss of function is the ultimate fact in issue, such opinions not being admissible before a court and jury, under United States v. Stephens, 9 Cir., 73 F.2d 695 , followed by United States v. … See also Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v.

Calmar Steamship Corp. v. W. J. Jones & Son, Inc.

163 F. Supp. 463 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 13, 1958

The law of this matter is delineated by Ryan-Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic S. S. Corp., 350 U.S. 124 , 76 S.Ct. 232 , 100 L.Ed. 133 , and American President Lines v. … This conclusion invokes the rule of Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic S. S. Corp., supra, 76 S.Ct. at page 234 , and American President Lines v.

Xu v. Lightsmyth Technologies, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon · May 25, 2023

Brown was unqualified to supervise Plaintiff and her peers. See Berg Decl. … Manatt v.

Ayla C.R. v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 28, 2026

Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 494. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 493–94.

Rohde v. Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co.

263 F. 204 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 26, 1920

It was held by the Supreme Court, in Southern Pacific Co. v. Jensen, 244 U. S. 205 , 37 Sup. Ct. 524, 61 L. Ed. 1086 , L. R. A. 1918C, 451, Ann. … This plank consisted of a board 2 inches thick by 12 inches in width. There is a dispute between libelant and Shoop as to whether there was more than one plank.

Santella v. Grizzly Industrial, Inc.

286 F.R.D. 478 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 26, 2012

U.S. v. Ruehle, 583 F.3d 600, 607 (9th Cir.2009) (quoting U.S. v. Bauer, 132 F.3d 504 , 507 (9th Cir.1997)) (internal quotations omitted). The privilege, however, is strictly construed. Id. (citing U.S. v. … Americas, 605 F.3d 1373, 1378-79 (Fed.Cir.2010); Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp., 960 F.2d 1465 , 1470-71 (9th Cir.1992); see also Telular Corp. v. Vox2, Inc., No. 00-C-6144, 2001 WL 641188 (N.D.Ill.

Cain v. Tigard-Tualatin School District 23J

262 F. Supp. 2d 1120 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 8, 2003

See Connick, 461 U.S. at 138 , 108 S.Ct. 1684 ; Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968); Perry, 408 U.S. at 597 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 . … However, plaintiffs believe that the vice-chairman of the school board vetoed or overroad the decision to terminate Geske. 4 The school board decided to discipline Geske with a “two-strikes” order.

Mitchell v. Hood

145 F. Supp. 2d 1188 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 22, 2001

Petitioner appealed the Commission’s decision to the National Appeals Board. On October 1, 1996, the National Appeals Board affirmed the Commission’s decision. … See Powell v.

Oregon Laborers-Employers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.

188 F.R.D. 365 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 1, 1998

Similarly, Valentino v. … Systems and Daikon Shield, plaintiffs here allege that defendants’ tobacco products cause across-the-board addiction and have across-the-board • adverse health consequences.