Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersord

3,469 results

1.69s

  • Thomsen v. NaphCare, Inc.

    District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 15, 2023

    See Cooper v. Brown, 510 F.3d 870, 942 (9th Cir. 2007). In evaluating proffered expert testimony, the trial court is “a gatekeeper, not a fact finder.” Primiano v. Cook, 598 F.3d 558, 565 (9th Cir. 2010). … Id.; see also Alaska Rent-A-Car, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bala v. Oregon Health & Science University

    District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 12, 2024

    See Webb v. … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cascadia Wildlands v. Bureau of Land Management

    District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 18, 2019

    Plaintiffs jointly filed a protest letter and appeal with the Interior Board of Land Appeals, which BLM denied on October 5, 2018. Pls.’ Mem. 12. … Natural Desert Ass’n v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Villavicencio v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

    District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 9, 2020

    Shelley V. … Supp. 3d at 1175 (same); see also Brown- Hunter v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Boles

    District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 4, 2026

    (quoting Consolo v. Fed. Mar. Comm’n, 383 U.S. 607, 621 (1966)). Adhering to this principle, courts “follow three important rules” in reviewing social security determinations. Brown-Hunter v. … See Bowen v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Green Cross Dispensary, LLC v. City of Brownsville

    District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 22, 2023

    See Evans v. … See Pearson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hunter v. U.S. Department of Education

    District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 12, 2023

    Desertrain v. City of Los Angeles, 754 F.3d 1147, 1154 (9th Cir. 2014). The factors do not weigh equally; rather, prejudice receives the greatest weight. Brown v. … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Martin v. Hermiston School District 8R

    District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 4, 2020

    Patel, 648 F.3d at 974 (quoting Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1997)). “The affirmative act must create an actual, particularized danger, and the ultimate injury to [the plaintiff] must be foreseeable.” … Defendant Usher was also responsible for implementing school board policies, including the concussion policy requiring students to obtain medical clearance before returning to practice and play, and was responsible for

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Trout Unlimited v. Lohn

    645 F. Supp. 2d 929 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 13, 2007

    In Alsea Valley Alliance v. … See Western Watersheds Project v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • D.B. v. G6 Hospitality LLC

    District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 1, 2023

    Compare Uihlein v. Albertson's, Inc., 282 Or. 631, 640–42 (1978) (store not liable for shopper assaulted in supermarket when little evidence of unsafe location) with Brown v. J.C. … Professors v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Chao v. Westside Drywall, Inc.

    709 F. Supp. 2d 1037 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 13, 2010

    Clark researched subcontractors with whom West-side did work during the relevant period through the Oregon Construction Contractors Board and the Oregon Secretary of State Corporation Division. … See Herman v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Don't Shoot Portland v. City of Portland

    District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 24, 2023

    The Court accordingly declines to impose the across-the-board reduction Defendant suggests for any inefficiencies that resulted from Plaintiffs’ staffing model. ii. … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hoff v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

    District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 10, 2022

    See Howell v. Saul, 833 F. … Gilliland v. Saul, 821 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Koehnke v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America

    District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 19, 2025

    .”); Saffon v. Wells Fargo & Co. … Santos v. Colvin, 2015 WL 3886939, at *6 (C.D. Cal. June 24, 2015). See also Chalfant v. Astrue, 2011 WL 61612, at *6 (C.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bahri v. Home Depot USA, Inc.

    242 F. Supp. 2d 922 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 18, 2002

    However, at least one Oregon case reviewing an Employment Relations Board decision dealing with an analogous issue has stated that ‘“[t]he causal connection is typically based on proximity in time between the protected activity … Dist. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Bass

    District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 16, 2026

    P. 56(c)(2); see Norse v. … Id. at 1037 (quoting Jensen v. Brown, 131 F.4th 677, 688 (9th Cir. 2025)); see Rankin, 483 U.S. at 381-82, 386 (finding that a remark made only to the plaintiff’s coworker addressed a matter of public concern).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cavender v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

    District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 23, 2020

    Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 493 (9th Cir. 2015). … Stubbs- Danielson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Overstreet v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

    District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 3, 2019

    Berry v. … Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 495 (9th Cir. 2015). The Court should find outstanding issues remain.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation v. Shea

    District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 1, 2024

    Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 291 (1965)) (first alteration in original). … Watersheds Project v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gerald S. v. Moda Health

    District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 31, 2025

    There, the court found the plaintiffs’ comparison of a “licensed and accredited therapeutic boarding school that provides residential treatment for girls” to “sub- acute inpatient treatment settings such as skilled nursing … See Paulsen v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.