Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersord

3,469 results

1.73s

  • Fagg v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

    District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 5, 2020

    If the Commissioner fails to meet this burden, the claimant is disabled. 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520(a)(4)(v), 416.920(a)(4)(v). … Plaintiff asserts the ALJ’s findings lacked specificity and therefore ran afoul of Ninth Circuit precedent, citing Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 493 (9th Cir. 2015). ECF 10 at 11.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • John Coe Richardson v. Deschutes County Circuit Court, et al.

    District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 9, 2026

    Jensen v. Brown, 131 F.4th 677, 696 (9th Cir. 2025). Section 1983 is not an unequivocal waiver of sovereign immunity by states. Will v. Michigan Dep’t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 70 (1989). … See Brazil v. U.S.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Oregon Aero Inc. v. Navigators Insurance Company

    District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 24, 2025

    Surfvivor Media, Inc. v. Survivor Prods., 406 F.3d 625, 635 (9th Cir. 2005) (quoting Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp., 960 F.2d 1465, 1470 (9th Cir. 1992)), superseded by statute on other grounds. … A.F. v. Providence Health Plan, 173 F. Supp. 3d 1061, 1082 (D. Or. 2016) (quoting United States v. Ruehle, 583 F.3d 600, 607-08 (9th Cir. 2009)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Crain v. Callahan

    996 F. Supp. 1003 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 18, 1997

    Smolen v. Chater, 80 F.3d 1273, 1284 (citing Dodrill v. Shalala, 12 F.3d 915, 918 (9th Cir.1993)). … Lester v. Chater, 81 F.3d 821 (9th Cir.1995).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hospitality Management, Inc. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance Company Risk Retention Group LLC

    District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 6, 2021

    See Thomas v. … See Jones v. Blanas, 393 F.3d 918, 935 (9th Cir. 2004) (discussing the district court’s discretion to consider new arguments raised in objections); Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bielenberg v. ODS Health Plan, Inc.

    744 F. Supp. 2d 1130 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 12, 2010

    V. … Brown v. J.B.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Garcia

    District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 24, 2026

    (quoting Consolo v. Fed. Mar. Comm’n, 383 U.S. 607, 621 (1966)). Adhering to this principle, courts “follow three important rules” in reviewing social security determinations. Brown-Hunter v. … Gutierrez v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Fierling

    District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 12, 2026

    Brown v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133, 141 (2005); Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 405-06 (2000). … Woodford v. Visciotti, 537 U.S. 19, 24-25 (2002) (per curiam); see also Early v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Feskens v. Astrue

    804 F. Supp. 2d 1105 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 8, 2011

    OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. Plaintiff Peter L. … Lingenfelter v. Astrue, 504 F.3d 1028, 1042 (9th Cir.2007)(quoting Orn v. Astrue, 495 F.3d 625, 632 (9th Cir.2007)).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Willis v. State of Oregon

    District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 24, 2022

    See Lee v. … Pugh, 438 U.S. 781, 782 (1978) (per curium) (noting that “[t]here can be no doubt . . . that [a] suit against the State and its Board of Corrections is barred by the Eleventh Amendment, unless [the State] has consented

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • DeFries v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

    District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 31, 2025

    Ybarra v. McDaniel, 656 F.3d 984, 998 (9th Cir. 2011); see also Washington v. U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Sec’y, 598 F. Supp. 3d 1051, 1076 (E.D. … P., Rules and Commentary, Rule 54 (2022); see also Brown v. S. Nevada Adult Mental Health Servs., 2014 WL 2807688, at *2 (D. Nev.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Corvallis Hospitality, LLC v. Wilmington Trust, National Association

    District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 11, 2025

    Governor Brown later extended the emergency period to December 31, 2020. Exec. Order No. 20–37. … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Betz v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

    District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 31, 2023

    See Burrell v. … Lambert v. Saul, 980 F.3d 1266, 1277 (9th Cir. 2020) (quoting Treichler v. Comm’r, Soc. Sec. Admin., 775 F.3d 1090, 1102 (9th Cir. 2014) and citing Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 493 (9th Cir. 2015)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Marcott v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

    District Court, D. Oregon · May 22, 2024

    (citing Tidwell v. … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Corvallis Hospitality, LLC v. Wilmington Trust, National Association

    District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 3, 2025

    Governor Brown later extended the emergency period to December 31, 2020. Exec. Order No. 20–37. … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Caldwell v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

    District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 3, 2024

    Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 489 (9th Cir. 2015). Instead, “the ALJ must specifically identify the testimony she or he finds not to be credible and must explain what evidence undermines the testimony.” … Burch v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • May v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

    District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 22, 2024

    Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 489 (9th Cir. 2015). Instead, “the ALJ must specifically identify the testimony she or he finds not to be credible and must explain what evidence undermines the testimony.” … Holohan v. Massanari, 246 F.3d 1195 (9th Cir. 2001); see also Orteza v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Manley v. Bristol

    District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 6, 2025

    Cory v. White, 457 U.S. 85, 90 (1982); Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651, 663 (1974); Brandon v. Holt, 469 U.S. 464, 471 (1985). … See 42 U.S.C. § 1977e(a); Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Towne v. Robbins

    339 F. Supp. 2d 1105 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 12, 2004

    (quoting Grimmett v. Brown, 75 F.3d 506, 510-11 (9th Cir.1996)). Thus the focus is on the injury at issue, and whether the plaintiff actually knew or a reasonable person would have known of the injury. … Duncan v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cortes v. Springfield Public Schools

    District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 24, 2024

    Specifically, it argues that, because the claim against it is based on its duty of fair representation, the claim is within the exclusive jurisdiction on the Employment Relations Board (“ERB”). … P. 12(h)(3); see also Pistor v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.