Case law

Intercontinental Bulktank Corp. v. M/S SHINTO MARU

422 F. Supp. 982 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 8, 1976

The Supreme Court in Warner Co. v. … Co. v. Minnesota Atlantic Transit Co., 49 F.2d 203, 206 (8th Cir. 1931); J. Griffin, supra note 7, at 586 [and cases cited therein]. 11 . Northern Nav. Co. v.

Scallon v. Scott Henry's Winery Corp.

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 18, 2023

“At all times, and with every configuration of the Board, HEI has sought to resolve Scott Henry’s underlying debt to HEI, which is the sole reason that this case exists.” ECF No. 251, 2 (emphasis added). … Citicorp Real Estate, Inc. v. Smith, 155 F.3d 1097, 1107 (9th Cir. 1998).

Black v. Arthur

18 F. Supp. 2d 1127 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 25, 1998

Goodrich Co. v. … V.

Willamette Family, Inc. v. Allen

District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 30, 2022

V. … Llewellyn v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners, 318 Or. 120, 127-28 (1993) (holding that appellant failed to preserve procedural due process challenge by not raising it with the agency first).

United States v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.

554 F. Supp. 504 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 28, 1982

Harry Merlo, defendant’s Board Chairman, testified that he had informally approached the FTC with his proposition. 5 Defendant had received legal advice from an attorney, well versed in FTC proceedings, to the effect that … United States v. Papercraft, supra, at 420 and 426; United States v. ITT Continental Baking, supra, at 932. Further, vindication of the FTC is an important element.

Vanburger v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 23, 2020

Barnhart, 340 F.3d 871, 874 (9th Cir. 2003) (explaining that the Court is “constrained to review the reasons the ALJ asserts”); Brown-Hunter v. … Brown- Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 493 (9th Cir. 2015) (quoting Lingenfelter v. Astrue, 504 F.3d 1029, 1036 (9th Cir. 2007)).

Berning v. Gooding

643 F. Supp. 26 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 7, 1986

In reaching this decision, I do not rely on Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943), and its progeny. … Friends of the Hop v. Block, 753 F.2d 777, 778 (9th Cir.1985).

Kaylor v. County of Santa Cruz

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 13, 2019

(quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)). … Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus. Corp., 544 U.S. 280, 292 (2005); Amerisourcebergen Corp. v.

Pelster Ex Rel. Boyer v. Walker

185 F. Supp. 2d 1174 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 20, 2001

OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. … See also Eades v.

Toth v. Ina Life Insurance Co. of New York

638 F. Supp. 2d 1262 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 14, 2009

See, e.g., Jebian v. Hewlett Packard Co. … See Mitchell v.

Menchu v. United States Department of Health & Human Services

965 F. Supp. 2d 1238 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 14, 2013

ORDER BROWN, District Judge. Magistrate Judge John V. … .”); Dean v.

ZAPS Technologies LLC v. Klinkhammer

District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 18, 2024

InteliClear, LLC v. ETC Glob. … See Kornbrodt v. Equitable Tr.

Burke v. Oregon Department of Corrections

District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 25, 2025

Brewster v. Board of Educ. of Lynwood Unified Sch. Dist., 149 F.3d 971, 982 (9th Cir. 1998). As a threshold, Plaintiff’s change in confinement could have implicated a liberty interest. “Under Sandin [v. … Johnson v. Ryan, 55 F.4th 1167, 1197 (9th Cir. 2022) (cleaned up) (citing Brown v. Oregon Dept. of Corrections, 751 F.3d 983, 987 (2014)).

Torres v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance

551 F. Supp. 2d 1221 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 14, 2008

BROWN, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (#22) and Plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (# 26). … Id. at 971 (citing Blau v. Del Monte Corp., 748 F.2d 1348 (9th Cir.1984)).

Martyr v. Bachik

770 F. Supp. 1406 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 1, 1991

He has been under the jurisdiction of the Psychiatric Security Review Board of the State of Oregon since 1977. … Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.S. 396, 414 , 94 S.Ct. 1800, 1811 , 40 L.Ed.2d 224 (1974), rev’d in part, Thornburgh v.

U S West Communications, Inc. v. Worldcom Technologies, Inc.

31 F. Supp. 2d 819 · District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 10, 1998

If the United States Supreme Court issues a decision in Iowa Utilities Board that is inconsistent with this conclusion, the parties may petition to revise the agreement. Id., p. 3. … Count V (due process) US West’s due process claim primarily alleges that there was insufficient evidence in the record to support the challenged decisions.

Gray v. Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc.

434 F. Supp. 1071 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 19, 1977

In the first, Neppach v. Oregon & Gal. … In the second, United Farm Agency v.

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Alpha Telcom, Inc.

187 F. Supp. 2d 1250 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 7, 2002

After SPA came on board, ATC remained as a processing center for the payphone program while Alpha continued to perform the service and maintenance of the pay phones. By all accounts, Alpha was a poorly run business. … Albanese v.

LRY, LLC v. Lake County

District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 27, 2021

V. … Johannesen v. Salem Hosp., 336 Or. 211, 219 (2003); see also Stroud v.

Klamath Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. Bureau of Land Management

522 F. Supp. 2d 1302 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 9, 2007

Molski v. … See Buckhannon Board and Care *1306 Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dep’t of Health and Human Resources, 532 U.S. 598 , 602 n. 3 and 626, n. 4, 121 S.Ct. 1835 , 149 L.Ed.2d 855 (2001).