Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersord

3,469 results

1.25s

  • Ozgur v. Daimler Trucks North America LLC

    District Court, D. Oregon · May 18, 2020

    United States v. Richey, 632 F.3d 559, 566 (9th Cir. 2011) (citing Upjohn Co. v. United States, 449 U.S. 383, 389 (1981)). … In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F.3d 754, 758 (D.C.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Colasanti v. City of Portland

    District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 18, 2025

    See Brown v. City of Tucson, 336 F.3d 1181, 1194 (9th Cir. 2003); Annenberg v. Clark Cty. Sch. Dist., 818 F. App’x 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2020). Requesting an accommodation is a protected ADA activity. Coons v. … Lutz v. Glendale Union High Sch., 403 F.3d 1061, 1068 (9th Cir. 2005).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Trusov v. Oregon Health & Science University

    District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 26, 2025

    V. Sands, LLC v. Nehme, 632 F.3d 526, 532 (9th Cir. 2011). … The FAC asserted two claims for money damages plus a separate request for declaratory relief against OHSU and eight named individual Defendants who are or were members of OHSU’s Board of Directors (“OHSU Board”) as well

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gosha v. Bank of New York Mellon Corporation

    District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 30, 2022

    After Judge Brown dismissed Plaintiffs’ prior suit—with prejudice—under Rule 12(b)(6), Defendants voluntarily rescinded their initial non-judicial foreclosure proceedings. … Malot v. Hadley, 86 Or. App. 687, 690, 740 P.2d 804, 805–06 (1987); see also Slover v. Oregon State Bd. of Clinical Soc. Workers, 144 Or.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Vanderpool v. SYSCO Food Services of PortLand, Inc.

    177 F. Supp. 2d 1135 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 16, 2001

    See Wellington v. Lyon County Sch. … Id. at 1259 *1140 (quoting Davidson v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Mercado v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration

    District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 24, 2022

    Massachi v. Astrue, 486 F.3d 1149, 1152 (9th Cir. 2007) (citation omitted); see also Burch v. … See Dominguez v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rossi v. Olsen

    District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 22, 2022

    Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 935 (9th Cir. 2005) (emphasis in original). A remedy must be available “as a practical matter; it must be capable of use; at hand.” Albino v. … Baca, 747 F.3d 1162, 1171 (9th Cir. 2014) (quoting Brown, 422 F.3d at 937) (internal quotation marks omitted).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Walburg

    District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 7, 2025

    He relies on TSI USA v. … See, e.g., Brown v. Glob. Cashspot Corp., Civil No. 17–1348 (JRT/DTS), 2017 WL 3278938, at *2 (D. Minn.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ross v. Blewett

    District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 3, 2025

    Brown, 464 F. Supp. 3d 1191, 1209 (D. … Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 94 (2006); see also Meachum v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hunter v. U.S. Department of Education

    District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 30, 2021

    P.P. v. Compton Unified Sch. Dist., 135 F. Supp. 3d 1126, 1135 (C.D. Cal. 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Brown v. U.S. Forest Serv., et al., 465 F. Supp. 3d. 1119, 1128 n.3 (D. … Or. 2020) (concluding that “serious questions” test does not apply to requests for mandatory injunctions); Maney v. Brown, 464 F. Supp. 3d 1191, 1204 n.6 (D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Snider v. Oregon Department of Corrections

    District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 27, 2022

    Kimbrell, 623 F.3d 813, 822 (9th Cir. 2010) (explaining that the PLRA does not require exhaustion when administrative remedies are “effectively unavailable”); Brown v. … Albino, 747 F.3d at 1172; see also Sapp v. Kimbrell, 623 F.3d 813, 822 (9th Cir. 2010) (explaining that the PLRA does not require exhaustion when administrative remedies are “effectively unavailable”); Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • State of Or. v. City of Rajneeshpuram

    598 F. Supp. 1217 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 16, 1984

    See, e.g., Clark v. Barnard, 108 U.S. 436 , 2 S.Ct. 878 , 27 L.Ed. 780 (1883), State of Iowa v. Union Asphalt and Roadoils, Inc., 409 F.2d 1239 (8th Cir.1969), City of Fresno v. … In Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Hensley v. City of Bend - Bend Police Department

    District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 15, 2024

    See generally Hensley v. Nike et al., 3:20-cv-00791-JR; Hensley v. ZGF Architects, Inc., 3:20-cv-00793-JR; Hensley v. Or. Dept. of Justice, 3:20-cv-00859-JR; Hensley v. Agorapulse, Inc., 3:20-cv-01539-HZ,1 Henlsey v. … Kate Brown”); Hensley 1 The last two of Plaintiff’s six prior cases—Hensley v. Agorapulse, Inc., 3:20-cv- 01540-HZ; Hensley v. Agorapulse, Inc., 3:20-cv-01541-HZ—were consolidated with lead case Hensley v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Pullom v. United States Bakery

    477 F. Supp. 2d 1093 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 6, 2007

    The Board upheld the corrective actions and plaintiffs termination. … See Holien v.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Express Car Wash Corp. v. Irinaga Bros., Inc.

    967 F. Supp. 1188 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 4, 1997

    Serv., Inc. v. Pacific Elec. … Furrer v. Brown, 62 F.3d 1092 (8th Cir.1995); Walls v. Waste Resource Corp., 761 F.2d 311 (6th Cir.1985); Portsmouth Redevelopment & Housing Auth. v. BMI Apartments Assocs., 847 F.Supp. 380 (E.D.Va.1994); Polcha v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bridge Housing Corporation v. Addie Smith

    District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 31, 2026

    McCown v. … Updike v. Multnomah County, 2020 WL 4736461, at *2 (D. Or. Aug. 14, 2020) (quoting Noel v. Hall, 2013 WL 5376542, at *6 (D. Or. Sept. 24, 2013)); cf. Lyon v. Chase Bank USA, N.A., 656 F.3d 877, 892 (9th Cir. 2011).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Womack v. Kelly

    District Court, D. Oregon · May 28, 2020

    .@ Brown v. ODOC, 751 F.3d 983, 987 (9th Cir. 2014) (quotation omitted). … .@ See Brown, 751 F.3d at 988 (27 months in segregated housing); Smith v. Powell, Case No. 2:14-cv-01725-SB, 2016 WL 1183086 (D. Or.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Clark v. Wells Fargo Bank

    District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 5, 2020

    Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992), as amended (May 22, 1992). District courts also have inherent power to control their dockets and punish for violation of their orders. Id.; Chambers v. … Halaco Eng’g Co. v. Costle, 843 F.2d 376, 380 (9th Cir. 1988).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Masters v. City of Rainier

    238 F. 827 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 8, 1917

    So in Hitchcock v. … All the principles involved in this case are substantially and ably treated in the case of Board of Com’rs v. Platt, 79 Fed. 567 , 25 C. C. A. 87 , and the reasoning there applied is manifestly decisive of this.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Juiceme, LLC v. Booster Juice Ltd. Partnership

    730 F. Supp. 2d 1276 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 30, 2010

    OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, — U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1949 , 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009). See also Bell Atlantic v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555-56 , 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007).

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.