Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,469 results
1.25s
Ozgur v. Daimler Trucks North America LLC
District Court, D. Oregon · May 18, 2020
United States v. Richey, 632 F.3d 559, 566 (9th Cir. 2011) (citing Upjohn Co. v. United States, 449 U.S. 383, 389 (1981)). … In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F.3d 754, 758 (D.C.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Jun 18, 2025
See Brown v. City of Tucson, 336 F.3d 1181, 1194 (9th Cir. 2003); Annenberg v. Clark Cty. Sch. Dist., 818 F. App’x 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2020). Requesting an accommodation is a protected ADA activity. Coons v. … Lutz v. Glendale Union High Sch., 403 F.3d 1061, 1068 (9th Cir. 2005).
Cited 0 timesUnknownTrusov v. Oregon Health & Science University
District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 26, 2025
V. Sands, LLC v. Nehme, 632 F.3d 526, 532 (9th Cir. 2011). … The FAC asserted two claims for money damages plus a separate request for declaratory relief against OHSU and eight named individual Defendants who are or were members of OHSU’s Board of Directors (“OHSU Board”) as well
Cited 0 timesUnknownGosha v. Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 30, 2022
After Judge Brown dismissed Plaintiffs’ prior suit—with prejudice—under Rule 12(b)(6), Defendants voluntarily rescinded their initial non-judicial foreclosure proceedings. … Malot v. Hadley, 86 Or. App. 687, 690, 740 P.2d 804, 805–06 (1987); see also Slover v. Oregon State Bd. of Clinical Soc. Workers, 144 Or.
Cited 0 timesUnknownVanderpool v. SYSCO Food Services of PortLand, Inc.
177 F. Supp. 2d 1135 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 16, 2001
See Wellington v. Lyon County Sch. … Id. at 1259 *1140 (quoting Davidson v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedMercado v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 24, 2022
Massachi v. Astrue, 486 F.3d 1149, 1152 (9th Cir. 2007) (citation omitted); see also Burch v. … See Dominguez v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Nov 22, 2022
Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 935 (9th Cir. 2005) (emphasis in original). A remedy must be available “as a practical matter; it must be capable of use; at hand.” Albino v. … Baca, 747 F.3d 1162, 1171 (9th Cir. 2014) (quoting Brown, 422 F.3d at 937) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Oct 7, 2025
He relies on TSI USA v. … See, e.g., Brown v. Glob. Cashspot Corp., Civil No. 17–1348 (JRT/DTS), 2017 WL 3278938, at *2 (D. Minn.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Feb 3, 2025
Brown, 464 F. Supp. 3d 1191, 1209 (D. … Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 94 (2006); see also Meachum v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownHunter v. U.S. Department of Education
District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 30, 2021
P.P. v. Compton Unified Sch. Dist., 135 F. Supp. 3d 1126, 1135 (C.D. Cal. 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Brown v. U.S. Forest Serv., et al., 465 F. Supp. 3d. 1119, 1128 n.3 (D. … Or. 2020) (concluding that “serious questions” test does not apply to requests for mandatory injunctions); Maney v. Brown, 464 F. Supp. 3d 1191, 1204 n.6 (D.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSnider v. Oregon Department of Corrections
District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 27, 2022
Kimbrell, 623 F.3d 813, 822 (9th Cir. 2010) (explaining that the PLRA does not require exhaustion when administrative remedies are “effectively unavailable”); Brown v. … Albino, 747 F.3d at 1172; see also Sapp v. Kimbrell, 623 F.3d 813, 822 (9th Cir. 2010) (explaining that the PLRA does not require exhaustion when administrative remedies are “effectively unavailable”); Brown v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownState of Or. v. City of Rajneeshpuram
598 F. Supp. 1217 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 16, 1984
See, e.g., Clark v. Barnard, 108 U.S. 436 , 2 S.Ct. 878 , 27 L.Ed. 780 (1883), State of Iowa v. Union Asphalt and Roadoils, Inc., 409 F.2d 1239 (8th Cir.1969), City of Fresno v. … In Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedHensley v. City of Bend - Bend Police Department
District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 15, 2024
See generally Hensley v. Nike et al., 3:20-cv-00791-JR; Hensley v. ZGF Architects, Inc., 3:20-cv-00793-JR; Hensley v. Or. Dept. of Justice, 3:20-cv-00859-JR; Hensley v. Agorapulse, Inc., 3:20-cv-01539-HZ,1 Henlsey v. … Kate Brown”); Hensley 1 The last two of Plaintiff’s six prior cases—Hensley v. Agorapulse, Inc., 3:20-cv- 01540-HZ; Hensley v. Agorapulse, Inc., 3:20-cv-01541-HZ—were consolidated with lead case Hensley v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownPullom v. United States Bakery
477 F. Supp. 2d 1093 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 6, 2007
The Board upheld the corrective actions and plaintiffs termination. … See Holien v.
Cited 35 timesPublishedExpress Car Wash Corp. v. Irinaga Bros., Inc.
967 F. Supp. 1188 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 4, 1997
Serv., Inc. v. Pacific Elec. … Furrer v. Brown, 62 F.3d 1092 (8th Cir.1995); Walls v. Waste Resource Corp., 761 F.2d 311 (6th Cir.1985); Portsmouth Redevelopment & Housing Auth. v. BMI Apartments Assocs., 847 F.Supp. 380 (E.D.Va.1994); Polcha v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedBridge Housing Corporation v. Addie Smith
District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 31, 2026
McCown v. … Updike v. Multnomah County, 2020 WL 4736461, at *2 (D. Or. Aug. 14, 2020) (quoting Noel v. Hall, 2013 WL 5376542, at *6 (D. Or. Sept. 24, 2013)); cf. Lyon v. Chase Bank USA, N.A., 656 F.3d 877, 892 (9th Cir. 2011).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · May 28, 2020
.@ Brown v. ODOC, 751 F.3d 983, 987 (9th Cir. 2014) (quotation omitted). … .@ See Brown, 751 F.3d at 988 (27 months in segregated housing); Smith v. Powell, Case No. 2:14-cv-01725-SB, 2016 WL 1183086 (D. Or.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Jun 5, 2020
Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992), as amended (May 22, 1992). District courts also have inherent power to control their dockets and punish for violation of their orders. Id.; Chambers v. … Halaco Eng’g Co. v. Costle, 843 F.2d 376, 380 (9th Cir. 1988).
Cited 0 timesUnknown238 F. 827 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 8, 1917
So in Hitchcock v. … All the principles involved in this case are substantially and ably treated in the case of Board of Com’rs v. Platt, 79 Fed. 567 , 25 C. C. A. 87 , and the reasoning there applied is manifestly decisive of this.
Cited 3 timesPublishedJuiceme, LLC v. Booster Juice Ltd. Partnership
730 F. Supp. 2d 1276 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 30, 2010
OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. … Ashcroft v. Iqbal, — U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1949 , 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009). See also Bell Atlantic v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555-56 , 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007).
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna