Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,469 results
3.43s
Patnode v. Sunriver Police Department
District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 19, 2021
Fister his superior, Plaintiff complied and provided to the board a memorandum summarizing the incident. Id. … Coszalter v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Jul 25, 2019
Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886, 897 (1984). … Western Pacific Fisheries, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Nov 30, 2023
Therefore, the entries for media contact are reduced by 50% across the board. … Brown, No. 3:12-CV-00138-ST, 2016 WL, 589684 (D. Or. Feb. 11, 2016) (class action). Further, the Court finds that Mr.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Jul 8, 2026
See Ave. 6E Invs., LLC v. … Naffe v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Dec 5, 2022
Aldabe v. Aldabe, 616 F.2d 1089, 1092 (9th Cir. 1980). … Tele Video Sys., Inc. v. Heidenthal, 826 F.2d 915, 917— 18 (9th Cir. 1987) (quoting Geddes v. United Fin. Grp., 559 F.2d 557, 560 (9th Cir. 1977)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Nov 30, 2023
Plaintiff responds that the international law principle of jus cogens,2 which plaintiff connects with the Nuremburg Code to prohibit forced medical 2 Explained in Johnson v. Brown, 567 F. … Supp. 3d at 1251; Williams v. Brown, 567 F. Supp. 3d 1213, 1224-26 (D. Or. 2021).
Cited 0 timesUnknownTunstall v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 20, 2022
Finally, plaintiff argues the ALJ failed to comply with Brown-Hunter v. … There is no error based on Brown-Hunter here. II.
Cited 0 timesUnknownScott v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
395 F. Supp. 2d 961 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 17, 2005
Scott requested a review of the ALJ’s decision by the Workers’ Compensation Board. That review is still pending. … Stanich v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBotts Marsh LLC v. City of Wheeler
District Court, D. Oregon · May 24, 2023
See Brown v. Roe, 279 F.3d 742, 745-46 (9th Cir. 2002). The Court adopts Judge Armistead’s recommendation to dismiss Plaintiff’s federal takings claim without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to seek a variance. … Carpinteria Valley Farms, Ltd. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Sep 20, 2019
DIRECTV, Inc. v. Hoa Huynh, 503 F.3d 847, 854 (9th Cir. 2007) (quoting Cripps v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am., 980 F.2d 1261, 1267 (9th Cir. 1992)); see also Geddes v. United Fin. Grp., 559 F.2d 557, 560 (9th Cir. 1977). … Aldabe v. Aldabe, 616 F.2d 1089, 1092 (9th Cir. 1980); see also Dreith v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown37 F. 846 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 12, 1889
S. v. Ferry Co., 21 Fed. … In McCulloch v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Jul 26, 2023
Bunnell v. Brown, Case No. 3:17-cv-1786-SI, 2018 WL 3040893, at *3 (D. Or. June 19, 2019) (citing McKithen v. Brown, 481 F.3d 89, 97 (2nd Cir. 2007)). … See Martin v. Boise, 920 F.3d 584 (9th Cir. 2019). III.
Cited 0 timesUnknownGalczynski v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 10, 2025
(quoting Consolo v. Fed. Mar. Comm’n, 383 U.S. 607, 621 (1966). Adhering to this principle, courts “follow three important rules” in reviewing social security determinations. Brown-Hunter v. … See Burkett v. Saul, 806 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Apr 19, 2023
Aldabe v. Aldabe, 616 F.2d 1089, 1092 (9th Cir. 1980). … TeleVideo Sys., Inc. v. Heidenthal, 826 F.2d 915, 917— 18 (9th Cir, 1987). “Thus, the court must accept plaintiff's facts in the complaint as true, but the plaintiff must prove damages.” Joe Hand Prods. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Mar 4, 2025
Franklin v. … See Olajide v. Brown, No. 18-CV-04225-EMC, 2018 WL 3429077, at *2 (N.D. Cal. July 16, 2018) (“Although leave to amend is to be liberally granted, Mr.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMillmen's Union Local No. 1120 v. Pay Less Drug Stores Northwest, Inc.
589 F. Supp. 675 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 5, 1984
In McNaughton v. … In United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners v.
Cited 4 timesPublished935 F. Supp. 1104 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 19, 1996
Brown v. Rison, 895 F.2d 533, 535 (9th Cir.1990). … United States v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedWilcox Development Co. v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon, N.A.
605 F. Supp. 592 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 7, 1985
Proctor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 675 F.2d 308, 327 (D.C.Cir.1982); State of Montana v. Superamerica, 559 F.Supp. 298, 303 (D.Mont.1983). … There was ample testimony at trial that while the CEOs of the five Interstate Banks did meet regularly with the Chairman of the Board of Bancorp, they did not agree at any time to fix the prime rate. Mr.
Cited 7 timesPublishedTorrance v. Aames Funding Corp.
242 F. Supp. 2d 862 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 25, 2002
Sciences v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. Univ., 489 U.S. 468, 475-76 , 109 S.Ct. 1248 , 103 L.Ed.2d 488 (1989); Moses H. Cone Mem’l Hosp. v. Mercury Constr. … Graham Oil Co. v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedTrowbridge v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 10, 2023
Lambert v. Saul, 980 F.3d 1266, 1277 (9th Cir. 2020) (emphasis in original) (quoting Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 494 (9th Cir. 2015)). … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 489 (quoting Burrell v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna