Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersord

3,469 results

1.26s

  • 21st Century Centennial Insurance Company v. Bonneville Power Administration

    District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 30, 2024

    No. 6:24-cv-92-MK (Trailing Case) v. … Defendant Eugene Water & Electric Board’s Partial Motion to Dismiss (#75) is GRANTED.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lafferty v. Providence Health Plans

    706 F. Supp. 2d 1104 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 12, 2010

    See e.g., Wiley v. Cendant Corp. … Atwood v. Newmont Gold Co. Inc., 45 F.3d 1317, 1321 (9th Cir.1995)(overruled on other grounds by Abatie v. Alta Health and Life Ins. Co., 458 F.3d 955, 966 (9th Cir.2006)); Tocker v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Joan Lafferty v. Providence Health Plans, 436 F. App'x 780 (2011)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Adrian v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

    District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 18, 2022

    Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 1148, 1154 (2019) (internal quotation and citation omitted); Ford v. Saul, 950 F.3d 1141, 1154 (9th Cir. 2020); Garrison v. Colvin, 759 F.3d 995, 1009 (9th Cir. 2014). … See Shapiro v. Saul, 833 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hoisting & Portable Engineers Local No. 701 v. Pioneer Construction Co.

    313 F. Supp. 753 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 17, 1970

    Wackenhut Corp. v. … B. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Sarantex Shipping Company v. Wilbur-Ellis Company

    391 F. Supp. 884 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 18, 1975

    Wilbur-Ellis Company v. M/V Captayannis “S”, supra note 1. 9 . … See also, Certain Bags of Linseed, Sears v. Willis, 1 Black 108 (1861) ; Cutler v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gorman

    District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 9, 2026

    Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 554, 570 (2007)). … Woodbury v. CH2M Hill, Inc., 335 Or. 154, 160 (2003). (citation modified). “[L]iability is triggered if any of [the] three disjunctive tests is satisfied.” Brown v. Boise-Cascade Corp., 150 Or.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • O.M. v. National Women's Soccer League, LLC

    District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 17, 2021

    Brown v. Pro Football, Inc., 518 U.S. 231, 236 (1996). … Counsel referred the Court to Brown v. Pro Football, Inc., 518 U.S. 231 (1996) and Zimmerman v. Nat’l Football League, 632 F. Supp. 398 (D.D.C. 1986). Neither case helps Defendant.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Salazar

    District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 21, 2026

    (quoting Consolo v. Fed. Mar. Comm’n, 383 U.S. 607, 621 (1966)). Adhering to this principle, courts “follow three important rules” in reviewing social security determinations. Brown-Hunter v. … On April 22, 2020, Havens sent a letter to the “Disability Review Board” confirming Plaintiff’s acupuncture treatments and sharing her opinion that Plaintiff experiences chronic back and neck pain that limits his activity

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Willms v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

    District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 16, 2020

    Apr. 2, 2018); Scott v. Colvin, No. 14-cv-04051-EDL, 2015 WL 11438598, at *13 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2015)(same); Burney v. Berryhill, 276 F. Supp. 3d 496, 500 (E.D.N.C. 2017); Read v. … Brown ANNA J. BROWN United States Senior District Judge 18 - OPINION AND ORDER

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Obataiye-Allah v. Steward

    District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 31, 2020

    Ramadan accommodations also include a hot meal or brown bag dinner during the fast to those on the Ramadan list. If a brown bag dinner is served, a ramen-type soup will be included. Id. at ¶ 14. … Alvarez v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Romero v. Reyes

    District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 12, 2024

    See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149–50 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). … F&R, ECF 46 at 10; see Harrington v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Barror v. City of Saint Helens

    District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 18, 2023

    Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154 (1985). … Comm'rs of Bryan Cnty., Okla. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 409 (1997).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Thompson v. Reed

    District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 21, 2023

    Bunnell v. Brown, Case No. 3:17-cv-1786-SI, 2 The Rooker-Feldman doctrine takes its name from Rooker v. Fidelity Tr. Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923) and District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. … June 19, 2019) (citing McKithen v. Brown, 481 F.3d 89, 97 (2nd Cir. 2007)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Barton v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

    District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 16, 2023

    Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 493 (9th Cir. 2015). … Id.; Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 494.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Key Bank National Ass'n v. Van Noy

    598 F. Supp. 2d 1160 · District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 2, 2009

    See Northon v. … As Judge Brown recently explained, “[s]ection 1920 does not contemplate an award of costs incurred for in-house copying expenses.” Teicher v. Regence Health & Life Ins. Co., No.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Huntsberger v. Umpqua Holdings Corp. (In re Berjac of Oregon)

    538 B.R. 67 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 4, 2015

    Plaintiff also alleges that Michael Holcomb, was a PCB board member, that Michael Holcomb had knowledge of the Ponzi scheme, and that PCC and PCB share board members. … PCD’s Mot. to Dismiss 7 (citing Roost v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Carter v. McNitt

    District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 1, 2020

    Brown v. Oregon Dep’t of Corr., 751 F.3d 983, 987 (9th Cir. 2014) (quoting Ramirez v. Galaza, 334 F.3d 850, 861 (9th Cir. 2003) (citations omitted by Brown)). … Nguyen, Whitley, Brown, and Lande; and Officers Herrera and Park.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. $28,980 in United States Currency

    786 F. Supp. 899 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 13, 1990

    These packages were almost square in shape, wrapped in brown paper and further wrapped with masking tape. Markee poked a hole in the packages and saw cash inside. … Under Terry v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Souza v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

    District Court, D. Oregon · Jun 18, 2023

    Second, Plaintiff could work as a circuit board taper, DOT code 017.684-010, with “an estimated 118,000 people working nationally” in that occupation. Tr. 68. … Br. 4, ECF 14 (citing Shapiro v. Saul, 833 F. App’x 695, 696 (9th Cir. 2021); Christopher C. v. Comm’r, Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 2:20-cv-01025-HZ, 2022 WL 305366, at *5 (D. Or. Jan. 31, 2022)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bixby v. KBR, Inc.

    895 F. Supp. 2d 1075 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 13, 2012

    See, e.g., Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); Warren v. … History of the Parties’ Dispute Kellogg, Brown & Root Service, Inc. (“KB & RS”) entered into Contract No. DACA63-03-D-0005 — known as the “Restore Iraqi Oil” or “RIO” contract — with the U.S.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.