Case law

Arnsberg v. United States

549 F. Supp. 55 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 11, 1982

The Fifth Circuit has questioned the continued vitality of certain aspects of Norton in light of the Supreme Court’s intervening decision in Carlson v. Green, supra. Brown v. … Smiddy v.

Chris v. Kang

District Court, D. Oregon · May 3, 2022

Holly D. v. California Inst. of Tech., 339 F.3d 1158, 1179 (9th Cir. 2003); Pink v. … See Surrell v. Cal. Water Serv. Co., 518 F.3d 1097, 1105 (9th Cir. 2008); McGinest v. GTE Serv.

Cole v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 11, 2024

Brown-Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 494 (9th Cir. 2015). When considering plaintiff’s testimony, the ALJ failed to meaningfully connect the dots. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 494.

Roland v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company

District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 3, 2025

Miller v. Glenn Miller Prods., Inc., 454 F.3d 975, 988 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Hunt v. Cromartie, 526 U.S. 541, 552 (1999)). DISCUSSION I. … On March 8, 2020, then- Governor Kate Brown issued Executive Order 20-03, declaring a state of emergency related to the pandemic. See Bartelamia v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 2023 WL 4622897, at *7 (D. Or.

Gessele v. Jack In The Box Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 8, 2023

Similarly, in Wren v. … For example, Liborio v.

Cufaude v. Therapeutic Level of Care Committee

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 1, 2023

See Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 360 (2001); College Savings Bank v. Fla. Prepaid Postsecondary Educ. Expense Bd., 527 U.S. 666, 669-70 (1999). … Brown v.

Hoffman v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company

District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 9, 2025

(quoting Gordon v. … (quoting Owens v. Kaiser Found. Health Plan, Inc., 244 F.3d 708, 712 (9th Cir. 2001)); see also Brown v.

Wilson v. Highberger

District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 14, 2025

Petitioner brought this habeas corpus Petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and challenged “prison term decisions” of the Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision on grounds that the Board violated his federal … See Burnett v. Lampert, 432 F.3d 996, 999-1001 (9th Cir. 2005).

Kersten v. Quick Collect, Inc.

152 F. Supp. 3d 1301 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 22, 2016

See Shaw v. AAA Eng’g & Drafting, Inc., 213 F.3d 538, 544-45 (10th Cir.2000) (False Claims Act case); Free v. Briody, 793 F.2d 807 , 808-09 (7th Cir.1986) (ERISA ease); Van Dyke v. BTS Container Serv., Inc., No. … Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961 (a), Plaintiff is entitled to post-judgment interest “from the date of the entry of judgment, at a rate equal to the weekly average 1-year constant maturity Treasury yield, as published by the Board

Slockish v. US Federal Highway Admin.

664 F. Supp. 2d 1192 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 13, 2009

Tyler v. … Brown, 567 F.3d 521, 523 (9th Cir.2009) ("As a general rule, in an injunctive case this court need not address standing of each plaintiff if it concludes that one plaintiff has standing."), citing Preminger v.

Regional Local Union Nos. 846 and 847, International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers, AFL-CIO v. LSRI, LLC

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 22, 2023

DISTRICT COUNCIL WELFARE PLAN AND TRUST, f/k/a LOCAL 846 REBAR WELFARE TRUST, By and Through Its Board … Publications, Inc. v. Multistate Legal Stud., Inc., 26 F.3d 948, 953 (9th Cir. 1994).

Stevens v. Pacific Inland Navigation Co.

220 F. Supp. 654 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 16, 1963

Compare Revel v. … Crumady v.

Walker v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 27, 2021

Attorney fees will be paid to Plaintiff’s attorney, dependent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. … Brown United States Senior District Judge

Regional Local Union Nos. 846 and 847, International Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers, AFL-CIO v. LSRI, LLC

District Court, D. Oregon · Dec 30, 2022

In Santa Monica Culinary Welfare Fund v. … May 21, 2021); Boards of Trustees of Inland Empire Elec. Workers Welfare Tr. v. Excel Elec. Servs., Inc., No. 2:21-CV-00200-MKD, 2022 WL 1243663, at *3 (E.D. Wash. Apr. 26, 2022); Constr. Laborers Tr. Funds for S.

Grigsby v. Miller

231 F. 521 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 13, 1916

Of a like nature is Board of Trustees v. Blair (C. C.) 70 Fed. 414 . Waterman v. … Payne v. Hook, 7 Wall. 425 , 19 L. Ed. 260 . In the case of Horn v. Lockhart, 17 Wall. 570 , 21 L.

Brotherhood Co-op. Nat. Bank v. Hurlburt

21 F.2d 85 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 8, 1927

Bank v. Anderson, supra; First Nat. Bank v. Hartford, 47 S. Ct. 462 , 71 L. Ed. 767 , March 21, 1927. … The assessing officers, of course, have no authority to assess for taxation notes and bonds which are by law exempt, and to require plaintiffs to appear before the assessing board to have other competing moneyed capital assessed

Gustafson v. City of Medford

District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 8, 2020

ORDER CITY OF MEDFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT; CITY OF MEDFORD, ATTORNEYS OFFICE; OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR, KATE BROWN, Defendants. MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark D. … United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the reports are correct.

Hollins v. Hendricks

District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 12, 2021

(Def.’s Mot. to Stay at 1, ECF No. 15; Maney et al. v. Brown et al., 6:20-cv-00570-SB (“Maney”), ECF No. 1.) … Patton v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., No. 19-cv-00081, 2019 WL 851933, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2019) (citing Landis v. N.A. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254-55 (1936) and Lockyer v.

Moser v. Federal Communications Commission

826 F. Supp. 360 · District Court, D. Oregon · May 21, 1993

As in Discovery Network, therefore, the validity of the TCPA must be determined under the law established in Board of Trustees v. … Board of Educ. of Westside Community Schools v. Mergens, 496 U.S. 226, 242 , 110 S.Ct. 2356, 2367 , 110 L.Ed.2d 191 (1990).

Dowd v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 18, 2020

Attorney fees will be paid to Plaintiff’s attorney, dependent upon verification that Plaintiff has no debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. … Brown United States District Judge