Opinion

Gustafson v. City of Medford

Court
District Court, D. Oregon
Filed
Apr 8, 2020
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 28.6%

The opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

MARY GUSTAFSON,

Plaintiff, Case No. 1:19-cv-01501-CL

v. ORDER

CITY OF MEDFORD, PUBLIC WORKS

DEPARTMENT; CITY OF MEDFORD,

ATTORNEYS OFFICE; OREGON

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; OFFICE OF

THE GOVERNOR, KATE BROWN,

Defendants.

MCSHANE, Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed Findings and Recommendations (ECF Nos. 12

and 19), and the matter is now before this Court on Plaintiff's objections to the first Findings and

Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Ireview de novo. United

States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the reports

are correct.

Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendations (ECF Nos. 12 and 19) are

adopted in full. The case is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff has leave to amend her

complaint within 30 days of the entry of this Order.

1 -ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 8th day of April, 2020.

__s/Michael J. McShane___________

Michael McShane

United States District Judge

2 – ORDER

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.