Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,469 results
1.99s
Donaldson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
District Court, D. Oregon · Feb 18, 2021
$6,640.63 will be paid to Plaintiff’s attorney, subject to verification that Plaintiff does not have a debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. … Brown ANNA J. BROWN U.S.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Feb 8, 2024
Petitioner challenged the Board's 2014 decision first through administrative review, then judicial review, which became final when the Oregon Supreme Court denied review in 2017. See Meriweather v. … Martinez v. Shinn, 33 F.4th 1254, 1261 (9th Cir. 2022), cert. denied, 143 S. Ct. 584 (2023); see also Slack v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownUSF Reddaway, Inc. v. Teamsters Union, Local 162
230 F. Supp. 2d 1180 · District Court, D. Oregon · Apr 11, 2001
OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. … See also Sheet Metal Workers Int’l Ass’n, Local Union 162 v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Jun 15, 2020
Severy v. Board of Parole, 318 Or. 172, 179 (1993) (italics in original). … Estelle v. McGuire, 502 U.S. 62, 67-68 (1991).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Oct 29, 2021
Clement v. … (quoting Brosseau v. Haugen, 543 U.S. 194, 198 (2004)); see also City of Escondido, Cal. v. Emmons, 139 S. Ct. 500, 503 (2019). In Garcia v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownEMCASCO Insurance Company v. Cartwright
District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 17, 2021
NOPC’s Board of Directors sent the party invitations to guests “almost all of whom were employed by or otherwise associated with” NOPC. Id. … The plaintiff alleged Ureta was covered by an insurance policy issued to the Browne-Hardy Clinic, a partnership of medical professionals. Ureta was not an individual partner of Browne-Hardy, but “Segismundo Z.
Cited 0 timesUnknownGibson v. Walden University, LLC
66 F. Supp. 3d 1322 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 13, 2014
In Carr v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. … Sept. 19, 2013) (finding that university handbooks and catalogs do not form a contract when the terms are not binding on the university); Brown v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Aug 3, 2020
In his Request Review (doc. 43), plaintiff points to Brown v. Oregon Dep’t of Corrections, 751 F.3d 983, 987 (9th Cir. 2014) to argue that his case a significant likelihood of success on the merits. … Moreover, this right is at least arguably “clearly established” after Brown, which may defeat defendant’s qualified immunity. See Brown, 751 F.3d at 989 (quoting Harlow v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · Aug 25, 2026
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 152-54 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). … Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154; Decker v. Berryhill, 856 F.3d 659, 663 (9th Cir. 2017).
Cited 0 timesUnknownFriends of the Wild Swan v. Fish & Wildlife Serv.
896 F. Supp. 1025 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 6, 1995
See e.g., Northern Spotted Owl v. … Brown, 38 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir.1994), offers a recent analysis by the Ninth Circuit of standing under the ESA for industrial-type plaintiffs.
Cited 2 timesPublishedRobinson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 17, 2020
ORDER - | to verification that Plaintiff does not have a debt which qualifies for offset against the EAJA fees under the Treasury Offset Program, as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). … Brown ANNA J. BROWN United States Senior District Judge SUBMITTED BY: Laurie B.
Cited 0 timesUnknown216 F. Supp. 775 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 26, 1963
Later, Pernula gave Bolam assistance and pulled him up on a board. Pernula then swam and pushed the board and Bolam approximately 200 feet to the side of the INVINCIBLE. … In Goett v.
Cited 9 timesPublished262 F. Supp. 2d 1139 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 19, 2003
OPINION AND ORDER BROWN, District Judge. … Plaintiff relies on Brown v. American Property Management Corp., 167 Or.App. 53 , 1 P.3d 1051 (2000).
Cited 6 timesPublished354 F. Supp. 45 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 29, 1972
Lathan v. Volpe, 455 F.2d 1111 (9th Cir. 1971); Calvert Cliffs’ Coordinating Committee, Inc. v. U. S. AEC, 146 U.S.App.D.C. 33 , 449 F. 2d 1109 (1971). … Greene County Planning Board v. FPC, 455 F.2d 412 , 424 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972); Pennsylvania Environmental Council, Inc. v. Bartlett, 454 F.2d 613 (3d Cir. 1971).
Cited 0 timesPublishedFredrickson v. Starbucks Corp.
980 F. Supp. 2d 1227 · District Court, D. Oregon · Oct 29, 2013
When the board took no action in response to the say-on-pay vote, two shareholders filed shareholder derivative actions in California state court against PICO and its board members. … judgment surrounding the PICO Board’s decisions to increase executive compensation in 2010.’ ” 724 F.3d at 1251 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedHeadwaters, Inc. v. Bureau of Land Management
665 F. Supp. 873 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jul 20, 1987
The decision to implement the sale was appealed to the Interior Board of Land Appeals (IBLA) by a group of opponents called the Thompson Creek Residents for Ecological Education (TREE). … v. Carter, 520 F.Supp. 334, 346 (W.D.Wash.1981).
Cited 2 timesPublishedRobinson v. Malheur Publishing Co.
272 F. Supp. 57 · District Court, D. Oregon · Jan 11, 1967
Rugger v. Mt. Hood Elec. Co., 143 Or. 193 , 20 P.2d 412 , 21 P.2d 1100 (1933), supports this view. … Vol. 1, Orgel on Valuation 2d, § 148; State Highway Comm’n v. Fisch-Or., Inc., 241 Or. 412 , 399 P.2d 1011 , 406 P.2d 539 (1965); State By & Through State Highway Comm’n v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWaterWatch of Oregon v. Winchester Water Control District
District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 22, 2021
Leite v. Crane Co., 749 F.3d 1117, 1121 (citing Pride v. Correa, 719 F.3d 1130, 1133 (9th Cir. 2013)). … This Court finds Judge Brown’s reasoning persuasive.
Cited 0 timesUnknownOregon State Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. Pacific Coast Seafoods Co.
361 F. Supp. 2d 1232 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 15, 2005
Deposition of Michael Brown, 89:9-90:6, Second Caldart Decl., Ex. 10 (Caldart Decl. II). The court finds that plaintiffs meet the three-part test for standing. … . § 122.41 (1)(4)(I); Sierra Club v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedGuenther v. Pacific Telecom, Inc.
123 F.R.D. 341 · District Court, D. Oregon · Aug 14, 1987
Perry, a member of the AmNet board of directors since 1983 and a member of PTI’s board of directors since 1985. The complaint was filed on December 24, 1986. … In contrast, in Lewis v.
Cited 8 timesPublished
Ask Donna