Case law

Anderson v. Public Employes Retirement Board

134 Or. App. 422 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 24, 1995

According to one school board member, when some of the members of the board expressed concern about the amount of salary in relation to the employment hours, Anderson said that the board was “not to worry,” as the hours “ … See Rectenwald v. Snider, 134 Or App 250 , 894 P2d 1242 (1995); Mobley v. Manheim Services Corp., 133 Or App 89 , 889 P2d 1342 , rev den 321 Or 47 (1995); Hussey v. Huntsinger, 72 Or App 565 , 696 P2d 580 (1985).

Baker v. State Board of Higher Education

20 Or. App. 277 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 10, 1975

Plaintiff has cited Chance v. Ringling Bros., 257 Or 319 , 478 P2d 613 (1970), in support of the argument that the complaint sufficiently charged a duty on the part of the Board. … Sprague v.

1000 Friends v. Board of County Commissioners

29 Or. App. 617 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 1, 1977

In Eagle Creek Bock Prod. v. … quasi-judicial adjudication — meaning that the local government is the primary decisionmaker and factfinder, with its decision being judicially reviewed only for substantial evidence. ****** "It follows that the order of the board

Smith v. Oregon Board of Parole

143 Or. App. 408 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 11, 1996

Defendant is correct that, before passage of the current version of ORS 144.335, habeas corpus was not an available remedy for one who failed to seek judicial review of a Board of Parole order. Billings v. … Meadows v. Schiedler, 143 Or App 213 , 924 P2d 314 (1996).

Moore v. Oregon State Board of Parole

54 Or. App. 369 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 26, 1981

OAR 255-35-010(2)(d); Harris v. Board of Parole, supra, 47 Or *374 App at 301. … We see no reason to allow the Board to enhance punishment for the two convictions when the trial court itself could not. See State v. Garcia, 288 Or 413 , 605 P2d 671 (1980); State v.

Hill v. MARION COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

12 Or. App. 242 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 20, 1973

Archdiocese of Port. v. Co. of Wash., 254 Or 77, 86 , 458 P2d 682 (1969); Bissell v. Bd. of Wash. County Comrs., 12 Or App 174 , 506 P2d 499 (1973). … Archdiocese of Port. v. Co. of Wash., supra at 84-85. We note that there is an apparent discrepancy *250 between the conclusion we reach here and the language of Erickson v.

Sutton v. Public Employes' Retirement Board

74 Or. App. 621 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 31, 1985

PER CURIAM Petitioners seek judicial review of the Public Employes’ Retirement Board’s order on reconsideration, which cancelled their disability retirement allowances. ORS 237.195(1).

Hodgin v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

127 Or. App. 587 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 27, 1994

Martin v. PSRB, 312 Or 157 ; 167, 818 P2d 1264 (1991). … Cook v. PSRB, supra, 123 Or App at 535 ; Hodgin v. PSRB, 113 Or App 580, 583-84 , 833 P2d 351 (1992).

City of Hermiston v. Employment Relations Board

27 Or. App. 755 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 20, 1976

Under State ex rel Heinig v. Milwaukie et al, supra, and Branch v. Albee, 71 Or 188 , 142 P 598 (1914), both discussed at length in Beaverton v. F. A. Fire Fighters, supra, our answer is in the negative. … Assn v. Sch. Dist., 24 Or App 751 , 547 P2d 647 , modified 25 Or App 407 , 549 P2d 1141 , Sup Ct review denied (1976); Sutherlin Ed. Assn v. Sch.

Patton v. State Board of Higher Education

59 Or. App. 477 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 29, 1982

Marbet v. Portland Gen. Elect., 277 Or 447, 456 , 561 P2d 154 (1977).

Hoffman v. Public Employes' Retirement Board

31 Or. App. 85 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 4, 1977

In Floersheim v. … No. 1 Reformed v.

Nickila v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners

124 Or. App. 380 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 3, 1993

In his first assignment, petitioner argues that the activities found by the Board do not come within the statutory definition of “chiropractic” in ORS 684.010(2), and that the Board exceeded its authority by interpreting … See Springfield Education Assn. v. School Dist., 290 Or 217 , 621 P2d 547 (1980).

Messer v. Polk County District Boundary Board

58 Or. App. 46 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 23, 1982

The Board contends that petitioners have the burden to establish the criteria set out in ORS 330.090(2) and that the Board could have concluded that petitioners had not met that burden. See Fed. of Seafood Hrvstrs. v. … Jurgenson v. Union County Court, 42 Or App 505 , 600 P2d 1241 (1979) (denial of zone change is supported by substantial evidence unless court can say proponent met burden of proof as a matter of law).

Campbell v. Board of Medical Examiners

21 Or. App. 368 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 12, 1975

We hold that under the facts presented here the Board was not required to start from the beginning, i.e., file a new complaint, issue and serve a new notice, and conduct a second de novo hearing. Labor Board v. … West v. City of Astoria, 18 Or App 212, 219 , 524 P2d 1216 (1974); Campbell v. Bd. of Medical Exam., supra, 16 Or App at 386-87 ; The Grog House v. OLCC, 12 Or App 426 , 507 P2d 419 (1973).

Merrill v. Board of Architect Examiners

71 Or. App. 636 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 9, 1985

The exact relationship between the School Board, Merrill, and Thaler and to each other is blurred. The School Board did not enter into a written contract with Merrill or Thaler. … determined by the board of not more than $1,000 for each offense.”

Morrison v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

277 Or. App. 861 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 27, 2016

Smith v. … of incarceration was speculative); Garner v.

Edney v. Columbia County Board of Commissioners

117 Or. App. 385 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 30, 1992

See Baker v. City of Milwaukie, 271 Or 500 , 533 P2d 772 (1975). … See, e.g., *389 Campbell v. Bd. of Commissioners, 107 Or App 611 , 813 P2d 1074 (1991). We agree with defendants that the trial court lacked the authority to consider the merits of the case or to issue the writ.

George v. State Board of Parole

93 Or. App. 212 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 28, 1988

PER CURIAM Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole setting his parole release date. … After the petition for judicial review was filed, the Board withdrew its order and issued one that eliminated a finding of aggravation under factor L.

Ward v. OREGON STATE BOARD OF NURSING

11 Or. App. 353 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 18, 1973

In Board of Medical Examiners v. … Board of Medical Examiners v. Mintz, supra.

Wilson v. Oregon Board of Parole

87 Or. App. 200 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 2, 1987

PER CURIAM Petitioner was convicted of several crimes committed in Multnomah County, and his sentences for those crimes include a 10-year minimum, which the Board of Parole (Board) sustained. … The Board enhanced that minimum by eight months, because of injury and threats of injury to the victims of the crimes.