Case law

Jensen v. Board of Dental Examiners

53 Or. App. 50 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 6, 1981

We remand this matter back to the Board for reconsideration of the sanctions to be imposed in light of our holding that petitioner is guilty of only two violations. See Palen v. State Bd. … It arises from the Board’s failure to give reasons for the sanctions imposed. Petitioner concedes that this question was determined by Mary’s Fine Foods, Inc. v. OLCC, 30 Or App 435 , 567 P2d 146 , rev den (1977).

Molina v. Brown

347 Or. App. 129 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 11, 2026

PER CURIAM Affirmed. 130 Molina v. Brown PER CURIAM Petitioner appeals a judgment denying post- conviction relief. … The post-conviction court did not err in concluding on this record that petitioner failed to prove constitutionally 132 Molina v. Brown inadequate or ineffective assistance.

Brown v. Gold Beach Dairy Queen

109 Or. App. 509 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 13, 1991

Claimant argues that the Board erred in that it did not provide an ordered set of findings, and a reasoned explanation of why her disabling pain causes only a 10 percent loss of *512 use and function. See Matthies v. … The Board concluded that his inability to perform such tasks constituted an impairment of 10 percent. 41 Van Natta 752.

Brown v. Miller

346 Or. App. 68 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 24, 2025

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STEPHEN LEE BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … Brown v. Miller, 336 Or App 460 (2024) (nonprecedential memorandum decision).

Osborn v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

171 Or. App. 248 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 6, 2000

Norden v. Water Resources Dept., 329 Or 641, 647-48 , 996 P2d 958 (2000); Younger v. City of Portland, 305 Or 346, 356 , 752 P2d 262 (1988). … functioning is a V code).

Harral v. Board of Boiler Rules

221 Or. App. 507 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 6, 2008

App. 507 HARRAL v. BOARD OF BOILER RULES. No. A135241. Court of Appeals of Oregon. August 6, 2008. Affirmed without opinion.

Tilden v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners

135 Or. App. 276 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 28, 1995

Without an adequate explanation by the Board as to its reasoning, we conclude that a meaningful review under ORS 183.482(8) is impossible. Stalder v. Bd. of Medical Examiners, 37 Or App 853, 859 , 588 P2d 659 (1978). … See Reynolds School District No. 7 v.

Romanov v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

179 Or. App. 127 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 23, 2002

The question whether the Board had the authority to extend its jurisdiction over petitioner turns on whether the legislature granted the Board that authority. As we explained in Gaynor v. … The Board argues, however, that Strecker v. PSRB, 154 Or App 130 , 960 P2d 893 , rev den 328 Or 41 (1998), supports its claim that ORS 161.327(1) authorized the Board to extend its jurisdiction over petitioner.

Davis v. Board of Architect Examiners

222 Or. App. 370 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 24, 2008

The board found the following facts, which, because they are uncontested on judicial review, we adopt. Meltebeke v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 322 Or 132, 134 , 903 P2d 351 (1995). … See Springfield Education Assn. v. School Dist., 290 Or 217, 223 , 621 P2d 547 (1980) (summarizing the categorization of statutory terms).

Bailey v. Public Employees Retirement Board

228 Or. App. 300 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 13, 2009

Petitioner seeks review of a final order of the Public Employees Retirement Board (PERB) that rejected her claim that she was entitled to receive credit toward retirement benefits for service as a public employee at Oregon … Oregon Nurses Association v. Oregon Health & Science University, 19 PECBR 696 (2002).

Phillips v. State Board of Higher Education

7 Or. App. 588 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 26, 1971

Bay v. State Board of Education, 233 Or 601 , 378 P2d 558 , 96 ALR2d 529 (1963). … The Board’s order was properly reversed by the circuit court. Affirmed. ① This is what the court held the same language meant in a similar situation presented in Whoriskey v.

Meriweather v. State Board of Parole

99 Or. App. 373 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 8, 1989

He had sought review of an earlier order, and we reversed and remanded, because the Board of Parole might have applied the wrong rule. Meriweather v. Board of Parole, 97 Or App 212 , 775 P2d 340 (1989). … Consequently, the motion to dismiss is denied, and the order is reversed and remanded for reconsideration in the light of Meriweather v. Board of Parole, supra.

Brown v. Travelodge of Oregon, Inc.

51 Or. App. 475 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 30, 1981

See Castor v. Erlandson, 277 Or 147 , 560 P2d 267 (1977); Barbour v. Peck, 44 Or App 363 , 606 P2d 628 (1980). Affirmed.

LEVEQUE v. Board of Medical Examiners

204 Or. App. 779 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 15, 2006

App. 779 LEVEQUE v. BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS. Oregon Court of Appeals. March 15, 2006. Case affirmed without opinion.

Smith v. Veterinary Medical Examining Board

175 Or. App. 319 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 11, 2001

We turn first to the Board’s argument that the record was not closed before the Brown letter was submitted. … Nonetheless, the Board considered the letter in its fact-finding capacity even though it was not part of the record and the record was not reopened for its receipt. In Groshong v.

Miller v. Board of Psychologist Examiners

193 Or. App. 715 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 9, 2004

Spray v. Bd. of Medical Examiners, 50 Or App 311, 318 , 624 P2d 125 , modified on recons, 51 Or App 773 , 627 P2d 25 , rev den, 291 Or 117 (1981); accord Board of Medical Examiners v. … Sun Ray Dairy v. OLCC, 16 Or App 63, 74 , 517 P2d 289 (1973). Further, the text of a rule does not stand in isolation; context matters, particularly other parts of the same regulatory scheme.

Randol v. Newberg Public School Board

23 Or. App. 425 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 24, 1975

In this writ of review proceeding the circuit court affirmed the decision of the Board. … In Neuhaus v.

State v. Brown

341 Or. App. 124 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 4, 2025

State v. Cunningham, 320 Or 47, 63, 880 P2d 431 (1994), cert den, 514 US 1005 (1995). … See State v.

Carrillo v. SAIF

310 Or. App. 8 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 17, 2021

SAIF, 291 Or App 589, 420 P3d 636 (2018) (Carrillo I), we remanded the board’s order for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Brown v. … The board did not explicitly resolve that issue, because it concluded, relying on this court’s opinion in Brown v.

Beiswenger v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

157 Or. App. 192 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 18, 1998

In support of the point, PSRB refers to Rolfe v. PSRB, 53 Or App 941 , 633 P2d 846 , rev den 292 Or 334 (1981), and Cochenour v. PSRB, 47 Or App 1097 , 615 P2d 1155 (1980). … Cook v.