Case law

State v. Bryant

245 Or. App. 519 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 21, 2011

As Neal and defendant were looking at a bulletin board in the day room, Neal called out to Lake. As Lake approached Neal, Neal asked Lake about a canteen call schedule posted on the bulletin board. … State v. Bucholz, 317 Or 309, 317 , 855 P2d 1100 (1993); State v. Allen, 151 Or App 281, 290-91 , 948 P2d 745 (1997).

Preble v. Centennial School Dist., No. 287

Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 10, 2023

The Workers’ Compensation Board (board) ultimately found that plaintiff’s evidence was not as persuasive as defendant’s. … Because the board found plaintiff’s evidence less persuasive, she ultimately failed to establish her theory of causation. 786 Preble v.

State v. Kayne

350 Or. App. 641 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 17, 2026

See State v. … State v.

Menasha Forest Products Corp. v. Curry County Title, Inc.

234 Or. App. 115 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 3, 2010

Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 449 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982); Yancy, 337 Or at 349 . 2 As noted, ripeness depends on whether the controversy involves present facts as opposed to hypothetical future events. … Co. v. Switzler, 143 Or App 223, 230 , 924 P2d 839 (1996); Aetna Casualty v.

Fosses v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary Commission

43 Or. App. 647 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 10, 1979

See, e.g., Hill v. Union County Court, 42 Or App 883 , 601 P2d 905 (1979); cf. Board of Comm. of Clackamas County v. LCDC, 35 Or App 725 , 582 P2d 59 (1978). … In Sunnyside Neighborhood v. Clackamas Co.

SAIF Corp. v. Doolittle

140 Or. App. 373 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 17, 1996

SAIF seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board, contending that the Board erred in calculating claimant’s unscheduled permanent partial disability, because it did not use the Dictionary of Occupational Titles … Until the Board has resolved them, and has explained how its findings lead to its conclusion, we are unable to review its order. Furnish v. Montavilla Lumber Co., 124 Or App 622, 625 , 863 P2d 524 (1993).

Conagra, Inc. v. Jeffries

118 Or. App. 373 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 3, 1993

See Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Knapp, 100 Or App 615 , 788 P2d 462 (1990). It contends, however, that at the time of the stipulation withdrawing the denial of the claim, there were no amounts due. … The Board affirmed the order and the order controls.

Stewart v. Salem School District 24J

65 Or. App. 188 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 12, 1983

See Springfield Education Assn. v. School Dist., 290 Or 217 , 621 P2d 547 (1980). … “Senate Bill 40 deals with this problem by requiring district boards to include in their annual activities and cost statement provisions for meeting the needs of all handicapped children in the district.

State v. Hardges

159 Or. App. 561 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 14, 1999

State v. Hardges, 152 Or App 496 , 952 P2d 574 (1998). We cited as authority for our decision State v. … See Brown v. Zenon, 133 Or App 291, 294-95 , 891 P2d 666 (1995).

Kessen v. Boise Cascade Corp.

71 Or. App. 545 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 19, 1984

Agreeing with the determinations of both the referee and the Board, we hold that they are not compensable. *548 The applicable statute is ORS 656.005(8)(a), which defines a “compensable injury.” … See Perez v. State Farm Mutual Ins. Co., 289 Or 295, 299 , 613 P2d 32 (1980). The statutory provision — often referred to as the “aggressor defense” — clearly contemplates a four-part test.

Davis v. Nye Ditch Users Improvement District

247 Or. App. 266 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 14, 2011

See, e.g., City of Keizer v. … See also Miller v.

Ake v. SAIF Corp.

192 Or. App. 617 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 31, 2004

The board reversed, stating that it “decline [d] to extend the holding of [Sound Elevator v.] … See SAIF v.

State v. Lovette

145 Or. App. 317 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 24, 1996

The issue in this case is the same as that addressed in State v. … State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990); see also State v. Montez, 324 Or 343, 357 , 927 P2d 64 (1996).

Stone v. Employment Division

28 Or. App. 303 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 31, 1977

See also Western Amusement v. Springfield, 274 Or 37 , 545 P2d 592 (1976); Bay v. State Board of Education, 233 Or 601 , 378 P2d 558 , 96 ALR2d 529 (1963); Wilton v. Employment Div., 26 Or App 549 , 553 P2d 1071 (1976). … See Wilton v. Employment Div., supra; Glennen v. Employment Division, 25 Or App 593 , 549 P2d 1288 (1976); Carson v. Employment Division, 25 Or App 589 , 550 P2d 463 (1976); Koach v.

Morelock Wood Products v. Baur

105 Or. App. 371 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 23, 1991

See Giusti Wine Co. v. Adams, 102 Or App 329, 332 , 794 P2d 451 (1990). … It cannot now argue that there was no request. 2 Morelock also asserts that the Board erred in assigning it responsibility for claimant’s knee condition. Substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision.

SAIF Corp. v. Blackwell

131 Or. App. 519 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 7, 1994

The Board affirmed. Under the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in SAIF v. … In summary, under SAIF v.

Blaines v. State Accident Insurance Fund

27 Or. App. 793 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 20, 1976

We reverse and reinstate the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. … In Deaton v.

MATTER OF COMPENSATION OF McGEHEE

72 Or. App. 12 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 6, 1985

The Board held that Jeld-Wen's acceptance of the aggravation claim and payment of benefits barred it from later denying the claim, citing Bauman v. SAIF, 295 Or. 788 , *93 670 P.2d 1027 (1983). … Wheeler v. Boise Cascade, 298 Or. 452 , 693 P.2d 632 (1985). Jeld-Wen's reliance on SAIF v. Mathews, 66 Or. App. 175 , 672 P.2d 1380 (1983), as being a modification of Bauman , is wholly without substance.

State v. Miller

108 Or. App. 566 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 28, 1991

ORCP 59H; State v. Brown, 310 Or 347 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). Affirmed.

Gardener v. MARION COUNTY BD. OF CTY. COMM.

226 Or. App. 464 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 11, 2009

App. 464 Diana V. GARDENER and Judson M. Parsons, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. … This case is materially indistinguishable, with respect to mootness, from Cyrus v. Board of County Commissioners, 226 Or. App. 1 , 202 P.3d 274 (2009).