Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.85s
Borum v. Employment Department
273 Or. App. 382 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 26, 2015
We review the board’s order “for substantial evidence and errors of law, and to determine whether [its] analysis comports with substantial reason,” SAIF v. Ramos, 252 Or App 361, 363 , 287 P3d 1220 (2012), and affirm. … See Nichols v.
Cited 0 timesPublished6 Or. App. 346 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 26, 1971
In the car the officers found a pair of surgical gloves, a riñe with sawed-off stock and a brown paper *348 bag containing approximately the amount and denominations of money which the clerk testified had been taken in the … On practically identical facts we held such evidence admissible in State v. Woolard, 2 Or App 446 , 467 P2d 652 , Sup Ct review denied (1970).
Cited 2 timesPublishedMATTER OF COMPENSATION OF McGEHEE
72 Or. App. 12 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 6, 1985
The Board held that Jeld-Wen's acceptance of the aggravation claim and payment of benefits barred it from later denying the claim, citing Bauman v. SAIF, 295 Or. 788 , *93 670 P.2d 1027 (1983). … Wheeler v. Boise Cascade, 298 Or. 452 , 693 P.2d 632 (1985). Jeld-Wen's reliance on SAIF v. Mathews, 66 Or. App. 175 , 672 P.2d 1380 (1983), as being a modification of Bauman , is wholly without substance.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMatter of Compensation of Olson
78 Or. App. 261 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 26, 1986
The Board reversed, holding that claimant had suffered a new injury for which ASB Construction was not responsible. We affirm. … Smith v. Ed’s Pancake House, 27 Or App 361 , 556 P2d 158 (1976). We also finá that the 1979 Oregon injury was a material contributing cause of the áisability. In Miville v.
Cited 3 timesPublished97 Or. App. 512 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 12, 1989
ORS 656.298(6); Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 206 , 752 P2d 312 (1988). … Clark v. U.S. Plywood, 288 Or 255, 260-61, 266-67 , 605 P2d 265 (1980); see *515 also Bailey v. Peter Kiewit and Sons, 51 Or App 407, 410-11 , 626 P2d 3 (1981). The Board concluded that Clark v. U.S.
Cited 0 timesPublishedOregon City Federation of Teachers v. Oregon City Education Ass'n
36 Or. App. 27 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 6, 1978
Cf., Richard v. Slate, 239 Or 164 , 396 P2d 900 (1964). … Cf., Credit Bureaus v. Allen, 251 Or 616 , 447 P2d 300 (1968).
Cited 7 timesPublished158 Or. App. 166 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 3, 1999
We review to determine whether the circuit court properly applied its standard of review, Harris v. Board of Higher Education, 145 Or App 477, 478 , 930 P2d 873 (1996), and reverse. … Norden v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedWebber Ex Rel. Estate of Webber v. Olsen
157 Or. App. 585 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 9, 1998
Pimentel v. … Compare Brown v.
Reversed on other grounds by Webber Ex Rel. Estate of Webber v. Olsen, 330 Or. 189 (2000)Cited 3 timesPublishedWhitney v. Employment Division
84 Or. App. 206 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 4, 1987
Lewis v. Employment Division, 66 Or App 303 , 673 P2d 1376 (1984). … Hill v. Employment Division, 73 Or App 422, 425 , 698 P2d 1010 (1985).
Cited 6 timesPublished255 Or. App. 195 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 13, 2013
Nevertheless, given the dictates of stare decisis, the court reaffirmed the vitality of the Brown/Kock “bright line.” Id. State v. … See State v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedGardener v. MARION COUNTY BD. OF CTY. COMM.
226 Or. App. 464 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 11, 2009
App. 464 Diana V. GARDENER and Judson M. Parsons, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. … This case is materially indistinguishable, with respect to mootness, from Cyrus v. Board of County Commissioners, 226 Or. App. 1 , 202 P.3d 274 (2009).
Cited 0 timesPublished107 Or. App. 89 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 15, 1991
See Dent v. Pollard, 227 Or 399 , 362 P2d 324 (1961); Poor and Poor, 96 *92 Or App 101 , 771 P2d 650 , rev den 308 Or 465 (1989); Moore v. Brown, Burke, 19 Or App 199 , 527 P2d 132 (1974). … Dent v. Pollard, supra, 227 Or at 400 . Affirmed. Costs, not including attorney fees, to mother. The propriety of the stipulation is not before us.
Cited 1 timesPublishedHaret v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.
72 Or. App. 668 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 20, 1985
We decided this question adversely to claimant in Button v. … In SAIF v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedKing v. Dep't of Pub. Safety Standards & Training
289 Or. App. 314 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 13, 2017
See Harris v. Dept. of Public Safety Standards , 287 Or. … See Watts v. Board of Nursing , 282 Or.
Cited 4 timesPublished24 Or. App. 389 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 9, 1976
State v. Corbett, 15 Or App 470 , 516 P2d 487 (1973), Sup Ct review denied (1974); State v. Brown, 1 Or App 322 , 461 P2d 836 (1969), Sup Ct review denied (1970).
Cited 0 timesPublished65 Or. App. 747 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 30, 1983
The first issue is resolved by Hilliard v. … League of Women Voters v. Washington County, 56 Or App 217, 221 , 641 P2d 608 (1982). ORS 215.185 has been in effect since 1955. Before the creation of LUBA, it might well have been applicable to the facts of this case.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBrand Energy Services, LLC v. Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division
261 Or. App. 210 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 20, 2014
State v. … Coats-Sellers v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedState Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Forrest
68 Or. App. 312 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 9, 1984
McGarry v. SAIF, 24 Or App 883, 888 , 547 P2d 654 (1976). … The referee and the Board were correct in concluding that SAIF may not at this point deny the aggravation claim based on loss of knee extension.
Cited 5 timesPublishedWestside, Etc. v. School Dist. 4j, Etc.
647 P.2d 962 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 8, 1982
LUBA relied by analogy on the Supreme Court's statement in Petersen v. … See also Jackson County v. Bear Creek Authority, 293 Or. 121, 124, 128 , 645 P.2d 532 (1982); Housing Council v. City of Lake Oswego, supra, 291 Or. at 885 , 635 P.2d 647 ; Petersen v.
Cited 0 timesPublished72 Or. App. 377 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 27, 1985
The board reversed, apparently because it did not find the medical evidence to establish a permanent worsening of claimant’s pre-existing asthma. … Although the board ignored the fact that two diseases were involved, we find it necessary to consider them separately.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna