Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.60s
Whitney v. Employment Division
84 Or. App. 206 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 4, 1987
Lewis v. Employment Division, 66 Or App 303 , 673 P2d 1376 (1984). … Hill v. Employment Division, 73 Or App 422, 425 , 698 P2d 1010 (1985).
Cited 6 timesPublishedWebber Ex Rel. Estate of Webber v. Olsen
157 Or. App. 585 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 9, 1998
Pimentel v. … Compare Brown v.
Reversed on other grounds by Webber Ex Rel. Estate of Webber v. Olsen, 330 Or. 189 (2000)Cited 3 timesPublishedPacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. Eachus
127 Or. App. 177 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 30, 1994
Intervenor-appellant Citizens’ Utility Board (CUB) appeals from a judgment of the Multnomah County Circuit Court affirming two orders of the Public Utility Commission (PUC) and the stay of one of the orders pending an appeal … In Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedRak v. State Accident Insurance Fund
31 Or. App. 125 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 17, 1977
On review by the Workers’ Compensation Board the referee’s opinion was affirmed. The circuit court reversed and entered an order directing that the Fund accept the claim and pay benefits. … The express rationale for the holding in Daly v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedHaret v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.
72 Or. App. 668 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 20, 1985
We decided this question adversely to claimant in Button v. … In SAIF v.
Cited 19 timesPublished81 Or. App. 642 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 15, 1986
Eldridge, Inc. v. Becker, 73 Or App 631, 635, 700 P2d 301 , rev den 300 Or 162 (1985). … Although City did not advance this argument before the referee, it did so before the Board. Destael v. Nicolai Co., 80 Or App 596 , 723 P2d 348 (1986). Accordingly, we can consider it here.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMatter of Compensation of Olson
78 Or. App. 261 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 26, 1986
The Board reversed, holding that claimant had suffered a new injury for which ASB Construction was not responsible. We affirm. … Smith v. Ed’s Pancake House, 27 Or App 361 , 556 P2d 158 (1976). We also finá that the 1979 Oregon injury was a material contributing cause of the áisability. In Miville v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedBrand Energy Services, LLC v. Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division
261 Or. App. 210 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 20, 2014
State v. … Coats-Sellers v.
Cited 9 timesPublished349 Or. App. 17 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 29, 2026
Innovative Design & Construction, LLC v. Construction Contractors Board, 278 Or App 448, 454, 375 P3d 533 (2016); see also Becklin v. … Noble v. Oregon Water Resources Dept., 264 Or App 110, 123, 330 P3d 688, rev den, 356 Or 516 (2014) (quoting Castro v. Board of Parole, 232 Or App 75, 84, 220 P3d 772 (2009)).
Cited 0 timesPublished65 Or. App. 747 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 30, 1983
The first issue is resolved by Hilliard v. … League of Women Voters v. Washington County, 56 Or App 217, 221 , 641 P2d 608 (1982). ORS 215.185 has been in effect since 1955. Before the creation of LUBA, it might well have been applicable to the facts of this case.
Cited 4 timesPublished99 Or. App. 52 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 25, 1989
The referee, therefore, upheld the denial, and the Board affirmed. On appeal, we reversed and ordered acceptance of the claim. … Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 205 , 752 P2d 312 (1988).
Cited 1 timesPublishedMark Latham Excavation, Inc. v. Deschutes County
250 Or. App. 543 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 20, 2012
Employees Union v. … Also, the parties do not cite Foland v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedState Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Forrest
68 Or. App. 312 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 9, 1984
McGarry v. SAIF, 24 Or App 883, 888 , 547 P2d 654 (1976). … The referee and the Board were correct in concluding that SAIF may not at this point deny the aggravation claim based on loss of knee extension.
Cited 5 timesPublishedHoward v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.
51 Or. App. 792 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 20, 1981
The evidence does not preponderate in favor of a different result than that reached by the Board. We defer to the expertise of the Board and its determination of the extent of claimant’s partial disability. Romero v. … Compensation Department, 250 Or 368 , 440 P2d 866 (1968) and Russell v. SAIF, 33 Or App 153 , 576 P2d 376 (1978). Affirmed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGeorgia-Pacific Corp. v. Perry
92 Or. App. 56 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 6, 1988
In this workers’ compensation case, both the referee and the Board awarded benefits for permanent total disability. The record shows that claimant’s attorney advised him to refuse vocational assistance. … ORS 656.206(3); Willamette Poultry Co. v. Wilson, 60 Or App 755 , 654 P2d 1154 (1982), rev den 294 Or 569 (1983); Waler v. SAIF, 42 Or App 133 , 600 P2d 442 (1979).
Cited 2 timesPublished31 Or. App. 1015 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 5, 1977
Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., 280 Or 95 , 570 P2d 52 (1977).
Cited 0 timesPublished107 Or. App. 89 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 15, 1991
See Dent v. Pollard, 227 Or 399 , 362 P2d 324 (1961); Poor and Poor, 96 *92 Or App 101 , 771 P2d 650 , rev den 308 Or 465 (1989); Moore v. Brown, Burke, 19 Or App 199 , 527 P2d 132 (1974). … Dent v. Pollard, supra, 227 Or at 400 . Affirmed. Costs, not including attorney fees, to mother. The propriety of the stipulation is not before us.
Cited 1 timesPublished116 Or. App. 322 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 12, 1992
See State v. Morgan, 116 Or App 338 , 842 P2d 406 (1992). … Amendments by implication are not favored, Balzer Mch. v.
Cited 12 timesPublished255 Or. App. 195 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 13, 2013
Nevertheless, given the dictates of stare decisis, the court reaffirmed the vitality of the Brown/Kock “bright line.” Id. State v. … See State v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedColumbia County School District 13/Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance v. Thurston
96 Or. App. 686 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 24, 1989
There is substantial evidence to support the Board’s conclusion with regard to the bursitis. … See Boise Cascade Corp. v. Starbuck, 296 Or 238 , 675 P2d 1044 (1984).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna