Case law

SAIF Corp. v. Vinson

125 Or. App. 684 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 5, 1994

Under the Supreme Court’s holding in SAIF v. … We reverse the Board’s order and remand for reconsideration in the light of SAIF v. Drews, supra. Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

State v. Cadwalader

6 Or. App. 225 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 29, 1971

See State v. Miller, 2 Or App 87, 93, 465 P2d 894 , Sup Ct review denied (1970); State v. Madden, 1 Or App 242 , 461 P2d 834 (1969). … She testified emphatically that her viewing of defendant and Brown at the scene of their arrest did not affect her ability to identify them.

Myhre v. Potter

318 Or. App. 391 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 16, 2022

Stull v. Hoke, 326 Or 72, 77, 948 P2d 722 (1997). … In Brown v. Farrell; Farrell v.

State v. Liston

6 Or. App. 162 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 22, 1971

State v. Brown, 5 Or App 412, 485 P2d 444 (1971).

Story v. Astoria Plywood Corp.

110 Or. App. 162 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 11, 1991

Claimant assigns as error that the Board applied the rule in Guerrero v. … See Weller v. Union Carbide, 288 Or 27 , 602 P2d 259 (1979). Affirmed.

Summit v. Weyerhaeuser Company

25 Or. App. 851 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 28, 1976

After hearing, the referee allowed the claim and the Workmen’s Compensation Board affirmed. … The Board agreed with the referee.

Neal's Truck Stop v. Giger

53 Or. App. 402 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 3, 1981

The Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) affirmed the referee on the merits. The Board left the attorney fee award intact. … As to the attorney fee issue, the question of the Board’s refusal to consider the reasonableness of the award has been settled by SAIF v. Anlauf, 52 Or App 115 , 627 P2d 1269 (1981).

Stanley v. Employment Division

43 Or. App. 905 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 31, 1979

On appeal, the board reversed. … Wilson v. Emp Div., 34 Or App 289 , 578 P2d 486 (1978); Hawkins v.

Petterson v. Smith

79 Or. App. 108 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 23, 1986

. *111 See, e.g., Schubert v. People, 698 P2d 788, 793-96 (Colo 1985); People v. Brown, 107 Cal App 3d 858, 166 Cal Rptr 144, 147 (1980). … State v. Jones, 250 Or 59 , 440 P2d 371 (1968); State v. Haywood, 73 Or App 6 , 697 P2d 977 (1985). We construe ORS 137.320(4) in a manner consistent with that purpose. Davis v.

Friends of Bull Mountain v. City of Tigard

208 Or. App. 189 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 27, 2006

The statute provides that the 21-day period commences “the date the board delivered * * * the order upon which the petition is based.” ORS 197.850(3)(a). In Ray v. … See 1000 Friends of Oregon v.

State v. Freeman

24 Or. App. 389 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 9, 1976

State v. Corbett, 15 Or App 470 , 516 P2d 487 (1973), Sup Ct review denied (1974); State v. Brown, 1 Or App 322 , 461 P2d 836 (1969), Sup Ct review denied (1970).

Saif Corp. v. Sledd

162 Or. App. 295 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 4, 1999

it was authorized by claimant’s attending physician. 1 The Board adopted and affirmed the administrative law judge’s order, which was based on the Board’s decision in an earlier case, Kenneth P. … Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy, 159 Or App 44 , 978 P2d 385 , rev dismissed 329 Or 503 (1999). We remand to the Board for reconsideration in light of our decision in Bundy . Remanded for reconsideration.

Jones v. Steve Wilson Co.

18 Or. App. 659 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 23, 1974

Claimant had received a compensable injury award of 143 degrees (15 degrees for a left leg and 128 degrees unscheduled disability) which was affirmed by this court in Jones v. … Leech v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 254 Or 351, 359 , 458 P2d 438 , 460 P2d 359 (1969). Claimant did not prevail and the trial court’s denial of attorney fees was proper. Affirmed.

Davis v. SAIF Corp.

185 Or. App. 500 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 2002

The Workers’ Compensation Board held that it does not, and we affirm. Claimant compensably injured her knee in February 1997. … The board ultimately upheld the original aggravation date, and claimant seeks judicial review. On review, claimant contends that statutory provisions and our holding in Johansen v.

Carr v. Allied Plating Co.

81 Or. App. 306 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 10, 1986

ORS 656.245. 1 The Board affirmed. Res judicata bars claims which were or could have been litigated in a prior proceeding. Million v. SAIF, 45 Or App 1097, 1102 , 610 P2d 285 , rev den 289 Or 337 (1980). … The Board and the referee did not err in holding that Allied is the responsible employer. See Fred Meyer v. Benjamin Franklin Savings & Loan, 73 Or App 795, 799 , 700 P2d 257 , rev den 300 Or 162 (1985).

Reed v. Del Chemical Corp.

23 Or. App. 213 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 28, 1975

A prior appeal on the same claim at an earlier stage in the continuing litigation is reported as Reed v. Del Chem. Corp., 16 Or App 366 , 518 P2d 679 , Sup Ct review denied (1974). … In Jackson v.

Benninger v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

92 Or. App. 709 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 24, 1988

Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200 , 752 P2d 312 (1988). … “When the Board reverses, adequate judicial review requires specific findings in the Board’s opinion substantiating its contrary conclusion.” Johnston v. James River Corporation, 91 Or App 721 , 756 P2d 696 (1988).

Watts v. Maass

88 Or. App. 317 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 18, 1987

A sentence under ORS 161.610 sets the earliest time at which the Board of Parole can release an inmate on parole. Smith v. Board of Parole, 297 Or 184 , 683 P2d 998 (1984). … The distinctions between minimum sentences imposed under ORS 161.610 and ORS 144.110 were explained in State v.

Oregon City Federation of Teachers v. Oregon City Education Ass'n

36 Or. App. 27 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 6, 1978

Cf., Richard v. Slate, 239 Or 164 , 396 P2d 900 (1964). … Cf., Credit Bureaus v. Allen, 251 Or 616 , 447 P2d 300 (1968).

Hefty v. Comprehensive Care Corporation

90 Or. App. 310 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 6, 1988

Relying on Stewart v. … See Fisher v.