Case law

Haret v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

72 Or. App. 668 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 20, 1985

We decided this question adversely to claimant in Button v. … In SAIF v.

Mark Latham Excavation, Inc. v. Deschutes County

250 Or. App. 543 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 20, 2012

Employees Union v. … Also, the parties do not cite Foland v.

Cascade Broadcasting Corp. v. Groener

51 Or. App. 533 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 6, 1981

Plaintiff petitioned the Clackamas County Circuit Court for review of the order of the Board of County Commissioners. … Bienz v. City of Dayton, 29 Or App 761, 776 , 566 P2d 904 (1977); Heilman v. City of Roseburg, 39 Or App 71, 77 , 591 P2d 390 (1979).

Greene v. Wilson

149 Or. App. 435 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 6, 1997

Lane v. Brown, 138 Or App 34 , 906 P2d 821 (1995), rev allowed 323 Or 114 (1996).

Answorth, Inc. v. OLCC

344 Or. App. 470 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 29, 2025

Board of Parole, 356 Or 186, 195, 335 P3d 828 (2014) (quoting Ross v. Springfield School Dist. No. 19, 294 Or 357, 370, 657 P2d 188 (1982)). … T. v.

Morgan v. Valley Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.

289 Or. App. 454 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 28, 2017

See , e.g. , Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. … Associates, Inc., prepared at the request of the board and found in the board's files * * *.

Hannum v. EBI Companies

83 Or. App. 346 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 28, 1987

In the hearing on EBI’s “backup” denial the referee found that EBI could properly issue a “backup” denial under Bauman v. … The Board affirmed without opinion. Claimant sought review only of the Board’s order affirming the denial.

SAIF Corp. v. Dooley

107 Or. App. 287 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 22, 1991

The Board erred as a matter of law when it ruled that claimant did not sustain “a compensable injury due to the * * * wrong of a third person.” In Grable v. … In SAIF v.

State v. Acosta

112 Or. App. 191 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 25, 1992

As we held in Bailey v. … Board on Police Standards, 100 Or App 739, 742 , 788 P2d 1022 (1990): ‘ ‘Although the meaning of the rule is a question of law for the court, [the Board’s] interpretation is entitled to some *196 deference, especially in

State v. Tracy

116 Or. App. 329 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 12, 1992

State v. Enos, 114 Or App 208 , 836 P2d 1347 (1992); State v. Markham, 114 Or App 5 , 836 P2d 1348 (1992). Affirmed. … ORAP 5.45(2); State v. Brown, 310 Or 347 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). The state correctly notes that the limits also complied with those for consecutive sentences under OAR 253-12-020.

Lemke v. Lane County

57 Or. App. 55 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 26, 1982

This is an appeal from an order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) affirming the denial by the Lane County Board of Commissioners (County) of petitioner’s application for approval of a tentative subdivision plat. … See Clackamas County v. Holmes, 265 Or 193 , 508 P2d 190 (1973); cf. Eklund v.

Liu v. Portland State University

281 Or. App. 294 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 28, 2016

See, e.g., Mangus v. … Morrison v.

Jacobson v. State Accident Insurance Fund

36 Or. App. 789 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 30, 1978

The referee determined that he had done so, and the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) reversed. The injury to which this aggravation claim relates occurred on November 18, 1973. … His primary argument is that his situation is an "uncomplicated” one within the meaning of Uris v.

C.W. McCallen Construction Co. v. MacDonald

172 Or. App. 738 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 28, 2001

Redman Industries, Inc. v. Lang, 326 Or 32, 38 , 943 P2d 208 (1997) (emphasis in original). Employer argues that Kessen v. … See, e.g., Irvington Transfer v.

Matter of Compensation of Bracke

51 Or. App. 627 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 13, 1981

We reverse and remand to the Board for further proceedings. … See Colwell v. Trotman, 47 Or App 855 , 615 P2d 1094 (1980). 2 See n 1, supra.

Watson v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.

5 Or. App. 353 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 23, 1970

Defendant appeals from an order of the circuit court which reversed an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Board which, in turn, had reversed the decision of the hearing officer. … Kehoe v. Ind. Accident Com., 214 Or 629 , 332 P2d 91 (1958); Keefer v. State Ind. Acc. Commission, 171 Or 405 , 135 P2d 806 (1943).

Whitney v. Employment Division

84 Or. App. 206 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 4, 1987

Lewis v. Employment Division, 66 Or App 303 , 673 P2d 1376 (1984). … Hill v. Employment Division, 73 Or App 422, 425 , 698 P2d 1010 (1985).

State v. Coverstone

260 Or. App. 714 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 29, 2014

State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). We analyze the claim of error based on “the law existing at the time the appeal is decided” and not when the error occurred. State v. … State v. Kanuch, 231 Or App 20, 24 , 217 P3d 1082 (2009). In State v.

State v. Simmelink

64 Or. App. 465 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 31, 1983

See State v. Jones, 279 Or 55 , 566 P2d 867 (1977). … See, e.g., In re Rook, 276 Or 695 , 556 P2d 1351 (1976); In re Barnes, 281 Or 375 , 574 P2d 657 (1981); see also Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 451 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982).

Intel Corp. v. Batchler

267 Or. App. 782 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 24, 2014

(the board) held below. … See Severy v. Board of Parole, 318 Or 172, 178 , 864 P2d 368 (1993). We begin our analysis with the text of ORS 656.268(10).