Case law

Wardell v. Employment Division

23 Or. App. 188 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 28, 1975

See, Possehl v. Employment Division, 23 Or App 189 , 541 P2d 1062 (decided this date); Evjen v. Employment Division, 22 Or App 372 , 539 P2d 662 (1975); Brown v. Employment Division, 22 Or App 382 , 539 P2d 666 (1975).

Smith v. Brooks-Scanlon, Inc.

54 Or. App. 730 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 16, 1981

In Butcher v. … In Morris v.

State v. Sturgill

116 Or. App. 390 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 12, 1992

State v. Brown, 115 Or App 327 , 838 P2d 624 (1992); State v. Harding, 116 Or App 29 , 840 P2d 113 (1992).

Davis v. NYE DITCH USERS IMP. DIST.

247 Or. App. 266 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 14, 2011

See, e.g., City of Keizer v. … See also Miller v.

Smith v. State Accident Insurance Fund

12 Or. App. 12 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 5, 1973

Boylan, 219 Or 448, 462-63 , 347 P2d 983 (1959); Stout v. … Jelleff, Inc. v. Braden, 233 F2d 671, 63 ALR2d 400 (DC Cir 1956); Cleary and Strong, Evidence 551, 552, ch 14(A) (1969).

State v. Etchison

34 Or. App. 3 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 1, 1978

State v. Smith, 31 Or App 321 , 570 P2d 409 (1977); State v. Brown, 5 Or App 412 , 485 P2d 444 (1971).

Morse Bros. Prestress, Inc. v. City of Lake Oswego

55 Or. App. 886 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 8, 1982

Local boards were given the same powers as the state board. … See Warren v. Marion County et al, 222 Or 307 , 353 P2d 257 (1960).

Oregon Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Hall

200 Or. App. 128 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 1, 2005

We review board orders for substantial evidence and errors of law, ORS 656.298(7); ORS 183.482(8)(a); Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp., 309 Or 292 , 787 P2d 884 (1990). We reverse and remand. … The board reasoned that Reliance had accepted the claim and that under ORS 656.262(6)(a) it could not thereafter revoke acceptance. Relying on our decision in Taylor v.

Campbell v. Clackamas County

247 Or. App. 467 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2011

As we recently explained in Kleikamp v. Board of County Commissioners, 240 Or App 57, 60 , 246 P3d 56 (2010), “[i]n Friends of Yamhill County [v. … See Friends of Yamhill County v. Board of Commissioners, 351 Or 219 , 243 n 17, 264 P3d 1265 (2011).

Benton County v. Friends of Benton County

56 Or. App. 567 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 22, 1982

The Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) remanded the matter to the county after finding that the county violated its comprehensive plan and conditional use ordinance in granting the permit. … Multnomah County, supra, adopted from Hunt v. Washington Apple Advertising Comm’n., 432 US 333, 343 , 97 S Ct 2434 , 53 L Ed 2d 383 (1977).

State v. Hamilton

186 Or. App. 729 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 13, 2003

In interpreting a statute, we follow the analysis set forth in PGE v. … State v. Andrews, 174 Or App 354, 358 , 27 P3d 137 (2001). 3 Both parties refer to two cases that have previously interpreted this statute. State v.

Romayor v. Department of Public Safety Standards & Training

265 Or. App. 93 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 20, 2014

Both parties point us to Delehant v. Board on Police Standards, 317 Or 273 , 855 P2d 1088 (1993). … The court also cited Trebesch v.

State v. Deck

84 Or. App. 725 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 15, 1987

State v. Collins, 43 Or App 265 (1979); State v. Brown, 44 Or App 597 (1980). A remaining issue is whether witnesses who are sworn are restricted to giving testimony subject to the rules of evidence. State v. … See State v. Brown, supra, 44 Or App at 602 ; State v. Collins, supra; State v. McKinney, supra. 7 Conviction affirmed; sentence vacated; remanded for resentencing.

Wagy v. Armenakis

152 Or. App. 210 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 21, 1998

In particular, defendants asserted that, because plaintiffs claims in the second proceeding were “raised or raisable” in the first, see Barber v. … See Drews v. EBI Companies, 310 Or 134, 139 , 795 P2d 531 (1990). 2 Plaintiff appealed that dismissal, and we affirmed that disposition. Wagy v.

State v. Marmon

143 Or. App. 315 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 28, 1996

State v. Allison, 143 Or App 241 , 923 P2d 1224 (1996); State v. Brown, 143 Or App 263 , 923 P2d 1236 (1996). Leeson, J., concurring.

Verment v. Nordstrom-Best

20 Or. App. 261 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 4, 1975

The hearing officer affirmed the denial as did the Workmen’s Compensation Board and the circuit court. Claimant appeals. While it is true that claimant’s treating doctor, Dr. Robert A. … While the 19-20 months’ lapse before mentioning his symptoms is not controlling, see Neathamer v. SAIF, 16 Or App 402 , 518 P2d 1051 (1974), it has some persuasion.

Sherwood Park Business Center, LLC v. Taggart

267 Or. App. 217 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 26, 2014

Taggart v. Brown, No 3:12-CV-00236-MO, 2012 WL 3241758 (D Or, Aug 6, 2012), appeal dismissed, 575 Fed Appx 719 (9th Cir 2014). … See also Jaffe v.

Stewart v. Employment Division

28 Or. App. 779 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 21, 1977

Claimant appeals from a decision of the Employment Appeals Board finding claimant disqualified from benefits under ORS 657.176(2) (a), which provides that an individual shall be disqualified if he has been discharged for … Claimant says that at most he was negligent and argues that Geraths v. Employment Division, 24 Or App 201, 205 , 544 P2d 1066 (1976), and Babcock v.

State v. Foland

224 Or. App. 649 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 24, 2008

State v. … State v. Brown, 110 Or App 604, 611 , 825 P2d 282 (1992).

Taylor v. State Accident Insurance Fund

26 Or. App. 73 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 19, 1976

The board, upon review, reduced the referee’s award to 50 per cent permanent partial disability. The circuit court, upon appeal, affirmed the board’s award, and claimant appeals to this court. … Swanson v. Westport Lumber Co., 4 Or App 417, 479 P2d 1005 (1971), and second that in this case the referee found her testimony credible and thus under the rule of Hannan v.