Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersorctapp

10,000+ results

2.83s

  • Matter of Compensation of Hunter

    54 Or. App. 718 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 16, 1981

    The Workers’ Compensation Board reversed, holding that the County was responsible. The County appeals. We reverse. … It cites Harris v. State Ind. Acc.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Jacobus v. Klamath County

    Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 20, 2023

    Maguire v. … See also Towey v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Kast

    120 Or. App. 74 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 12, 1993

    ORS 475.035 grants authority to the Board of Pharmacy (Board) to modify the schedule. … State v. Sargent, 252 Or 579, 580 , 449 P2d 845 (1969). The statutory scheme must contain standards that circumscribe the agency’s exercise of the delegated powers. State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Sleigh v. Jenny Craig Weight Loss Centres, Inc.

    161 Or. App. 262 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 7, 1999

    See, e.g., Finchcum v. … However, citing State v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Motor Vehicles Division

    109 Or. App. 195 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 9, 1991

    The Supreme Court held in State v. … After Grenvik , we decided Matteson v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Panek v. Oregon Health Sciences University

    123 Or. App. 623 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 6, 1993

    In the light of our decision in Meyers v. … We agree with the Board that the question is within the jurisdiction of the Director. ORS 656.704(3); ORS 656.248(13); see Haynes v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 75 Or App 262 , 706 P2d 567 , rev den 300 Or 332 (1985).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Galbraith v. L.A. Pottsratz Construction

    152 Or. App. 790 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 25, 1998

    On review, a divided Board affirmed the ALJ’s decision, three to two. … We review the Board’s legal conclusions for errors of law. ORS 183.482(8)(a).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Parmer v. Plaid Pantry 54

    76 Or. App. 405 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 20, 1985

    The proffered evidence completes the otherwise incomplete record, and the Board abused its discretion by not remanding the case to the referee. See Muffett v. … The order on reconsideration is appealable to this court under ORS 656.298(1) and Tektronix Corp. v. Twist, 62 Or App 602 , 661 P2d 562 , rev den 295 Or 259 (1983).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McClusky v. City of North Bend

    Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 17, 2024

    Medina v. … Walker v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Joyce

    4 Or. App. 482 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 14, 1971

    In Browning v. … Rules prescribing methods of procedure of an administrative board or commission have the effect of law, are binding on the board or commission and must be followed by it so long as they are in effect. George v.

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Bingham v. Employment Department

    163 Or. App. 381 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 13, 1999

    Claimant’s position is not implausible, and, on this record, the Board could have made a different finding. See Armstrong v. … SAIF v. Leland, 160 Or App 480, 487 , 982 P2d 48 (1999). Consequently, the Board’s findings were supported by substantial evidence.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Eustace v. Speckhart

    14 Or. App. 485 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 14, 1973

    Respondents. place their sole reliance under this contention upon the decision in In Re Board of Directors of North Unit Irr. Dist., Gard v. … If this expenditure was illegal, the board members may be liable to repay the amount spent. Porter v. Tiffany, 11 Or App 542 , 502 P2d 1385 (1972), Sup Ct review denied (1973).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Stricker v. Taylor

    158 Or. App. 608 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 24, 1999

    In Brown v. Farrell; Farrell v. Brown, 258 Or 348 , 483 P2d 453 (1971), for example, the plaintiff subcontractor filed a hen against the defendant owners for materials, profit, and labor. … Snyder v. Schram, 282 Or 273, 276 , 577 P2d 935 (1978); Becerril v. Hakanson, 97 Or App 583 , 585 n 1, 776 P2d 1306 (1989).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Sims

    105 Or. App. 318 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 23, 1991

    State v. Brown, 310 Or 347 , 800 P2d 259 (1990); Brown v. J. C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 704 , 688 P2d 811 (1984); State v. Madison, 290 Or 573, 580 , 624 P2d 599 (1981). … State v. Shafer, 222 Or 230, 235 , 351 P2d 941 (1960); State v. Smallwood, 5 Or App 245, 250 , 481 P2d 378 , rev den (1971).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon, Inc. v. City of Eugene

    271 Or. App. 276 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 20, 2015

    See Guard Publishing Co. v. … See In Defense of Animals v. OHSU, 199 Or App 160, 175 , 112 P3d 336 (2005); Springfield School Dist. #19 v. Guard Publishing Co., 156 Or App 176, 179 , 967 P2d 510 (1998); see also Turner v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Halton Co. v. Nacoste

    282 Or. App. 420 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 28, 2011

    ORS 656.212; see Scott v. Liberty Northwest Ins. … Jones v. Emanuel Hospital, 280 Or 147, 152 , 570 P2d 70 (1977). We affirmed the board’s order in Nacoste v. Halton Co., 275 Or App 600 , 365 P3d 1098 (2015).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tidewater Barge Lines, Inc. v. Oregon Environmental Quality Commission

    159 Or. App. 296 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 17, 1999

    No. 48 v. Fair Dis. App. Bd., 14 Or App 35 , 512 P2d 799 (1973), the plaintiff challenged a decision of the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board by writ of review. … Wiggins v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bailey v. Boeing Co.

    141 Or. App. 200 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 22, 1996

    Because there was no order before it denying a claim for compensation, the Board concluded that attorney fees were not authorized. Following the Board’s decision, the Supreme Court decided SAIF v. … In O’Neal v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. White

    18 Or. App. 352 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 12, 1974

    State v. Brown, 1 Or App 322 , 461 P2d 838 (1969). … State v. Drummond, 6 Or App 558 , 489 P2d 958 (1971); State v. Huddleston, 5 Or App 9 , 480 P2d 454 , rev den (1971); State v. Robbins, 3 Or App 472 , 474 P2d 772 (1970). Reversed and remanded.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Speerstra

    63 Or. App. 533 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 22, 1983

    Brown v. Babcock, supra, 273 Or at 355-356 . 6 In US Nat’l Bank v. … The rule urged has never been applied in Oregon, although it was broached in Brown v. Babcock, 279 Or 351, 356 , 540 P2d 1402 (1975). It apparently came into being in two New York cases (Wilson v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.