Case law

Argonaut Insurance Companies v. Eder

72 Or. App. 54 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 6, 1985

We disagree and therefore affirm the Board. Claimant’s last injurious exposure to asbestos occurred on March 9, 1976. … See Barrett v. Union Oil Distributors, 60 Or App 483, 486-87 , 654 P2d 668 (1982), rev den 294 Or 569 (1983); Holden v. Willamette Industries, 28 Or App 613 , 560 P2d 298 (1977).

Sullivan v. Kizer

115 Or. App. 206 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 16, 1992

Mattiza v. Foster, 311 Or 1, 4 , 803 P2d 723 (1991). … Skinner v. Keeley, 47 Or App 751, 757 , 615 P2d 382 (1980).

State v. Slawson

123 Or. App. 573 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 6, 1993

State v. Cook, 108 Or App 576, 582 , 816 P2d 697 (1991), rev den 312 Or 588 (1992). … [State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990).]” State v. Farmer, 317 Or 220 , 224 n 4, 856 P2d 623 (1993).

Johnson v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

53 Or. App. 627 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 24, 1981

Forest Fiber Products Co., 288 Or 337 , 605 P2d 1175 (1980), *631 the referee then held claimant had a duty to file a claim by September 13, 1978, which she had failed to do. 2 The Board, relying on Templeton v. … Following Templeton , in Frey v.

Bidney v. Avison Lumber Co.

123 Or. App. 468 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 6, 1993

The Board reinstated the Director’s order. Claimant filed a second petition for review. The petitions have been consolidated for our review. In Jefferson v. … Board for reconsideration.

Barnes v. Lang

91 Or. App. 272 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 18, 1988

In addition to $7,000 in cash, plaintiff was to deliver to defendant a certain Browning .270 semiautomatic rifle, for which she would receive a $500 credit. … Henry and Henry, 301 Or 185 , 721 P2d 430 (1986); see also Rajneesh Foundation v. McGreer, 303 Or 139 , 734 P2d 871 , on rehearing 303 Or 371 , 737 P2d 593 (1987).

Service Employees International Union Local 503 v. State

209 Or. App. 497 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 6, 2006

Accord OUS v. … Accord, Roadway Exp., Inc. v.

Aleali v. City of Sherwood

262 Or. App. 59 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 2, 2014

Instead, citing Tarjoto v. … See Stull v.

Williams v. Joyce

4 Or. App. 482 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 14, 1971

In Browning v. … Rules prescribing methods of procedure of an administrative board or commission have the effect of law, are binding on the board or commission and must be followed by it so long as they are in effect. George v.

SAIF Corp. v. Cox

133 Or. App. 666 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 12, 1995

In Erzen v. … In particular, employer argues that the Board in Mize both misread Erzen and erroneously analyzed the text, context, and legislative history of the 1990 enactment of ORS 656.027(9). See PGE v.

Bingham v. Employment Department

163 Or. App. 381 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 13, 1999

Claimant’s position is not implausible, and, on this record, the Board could have made a different finding. See Armstrong v. … SAIF v. Leland, 160 Or App 480, 487 , 982 P2d 48 (1999). Consequently, the Board’s findings were supported by substantial evidence.

James v. SAIF Corp.

176 Or. App. 337 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 29, 2001

Syna’s opinion may have been sufficient to support a disability award, see Hewlett-Packard Co. v. … Toy, 174 Or App 275 , 279 n 1, 23 P3d 1015 (2001), but the Board was not required to accept Syna’s opinion or find it persuasive, Atkins v.

Fitzsimmons v. Island City Steel

162 Or. App. 345 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 11, 1999

He told the Board that his claim was not barred because it was not “raised or raisable” when the administrative law judge accepted the stipulation. 1 The Board ruled against claimant. … See Good Samaritan Hospital v. Stoddard, 126 Or App 69 , 867 P2d 543 (1994).

American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon, Inc. v. City of Eugene

271 Or. App. 276 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 20, 2015

See Guard Publishing Co. v. … See In Defense of Animals v. OHSU, 199 Or App 160, 175 , 112 P3d 336 (2005); Springfield School Dist. #19 v. Guard Publishing Co., 156 Or App 176, 179 , 967 P2d 510 (1998); see also Turner v.

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Ellison

208 Or. App. 612 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 11, 2006

The board did not address in its first order whether claimant was *615 precluded by the parties’ stipulation from arguing that any other date applied. 193 Or App at 637 . In Reynoldson v. … Eckles v.

Kalmiopsis Audubon Society v. Curry County

131 Or. App. 308 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 16, 1994

No appeal of Order One was filed with this Board. … See, e.g., Sauvie Island Agricultural v. GGS (Hawaii), Inc., 107 Or App 1, 6-7 , 810 P2d 856 (1991); Doughton v. Douglas County, 90 Or App 49, 52-53 , 750 P2d 1174 (1988). Here, as in Smith v.

Stricker v. Taylor

158 Or. App. 608 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 24, 1999

In Brown v. Farrell; Farrell v. Brown, 258 Or 348 , 483 P2d 453 (1971), for example, the plaintiff subcontractor filed a hen against the defendant owners for materials, profit, and labor. … Snyder v. Schram, 282 Or 273, 276 , 577 P2d 935 (1978); Becerril v. Hakanson, 97 Or App 583 , 585 n 1, 776 P2d 1306 (1989).

State v. White

18 Or. App. 352 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 12, 1974

State v. Brown, 1 Or App 322 , 461 P2d 838 (1969). … State v. Drummond, 6 Or App 558 , 489 P2d 958 (1971); State v. Huddleston, 5 Or App 9 , 480 P2d 454 , rev den (1971); State v. Robbins, 3 Or App 472 , 474 P2d 772 (1970). Reversed and remanded.

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Talley

136 Or. App. 550 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 13, 1995

There was, however, other evidence in the record, on which the referee relied, that could support the Board’s finding of compensability. Accordingly, we remand for reconsideration. See Skochenko v. … Weyerhaeuser Co., 118 Or App 241 , 846 P2d 1212 (1993); Asten-Hill Co. v.

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Speerstra

63 Or. App. 533 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 22, 1983

Brown v. Babcock, supra, 273 Or at 355-356 . 6 In US Nat’l Bank v. … The rule urged has never been applied in Oregon, although it was broached in Brown v. Babcock, 279 Or 351, 356 , 540 P2d 1402 (1975). It apparently came into being in two New York cases (Wilson v.