Case law

Harvey v. Morgan

9 Or. App. 123 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 21, 1972

This is an appeal from the order of the Oregon *124 Employment Appeals Board denying to petitioner unemployment insurance benefits under OBS 657.345(3), ① an exception to OBS 657.155(3). … Hic kam v. Morgan, 9 Or App 25 , 495 P2d 1243 (1972).

Gregg v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

81 Or. App. 395 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 24, 1986

We affirm the Board and write only to correct what we perceive to be a persistent misconception of the scope of the Supreme Court’s decision in Bauman v. SAIF, 295 Or 788 , 670 P2d 1027 (1983). … Affirmed. 1 Compare Johnson v.

Nichols v. Baggarley

79 Or. App. 505 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 21, 1986

Wallowa Valley Stages, Inc. v. … Wallowa Valley Stages, Inc. v. Oregonian, supra, 235 Or at 599-600 .” Great American Ins. v. General Ins., 257 Or 62, 66 , 475 P2d 415 (1970).

EBI Companies v. Department of Insurance & Finance

114 Or. App. 356 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 22, 1992

The Board disagreed. EBI paid the award and sought judicial review. We reversed, holding, in Independent Paper Stock v. Wincer, supra, that the Board lacked own motion authority to make a permanent disability award. … Whipple v. Howser, 291 Or 475, 481 , 632 P2d 782 (1981).

Hudson v. Feder

115 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 26, 1992

Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 449 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982). No relief that could have been directed at defendant could accomplish those essential conditions of justiciability. … Brown v. Oregon State Bar, supra, 293 Or at 449-50 . Wright v. Hazen Investments, Inc., 293 Or 259 , 648 P2d 360 (1982), and Eddy v.

Ochoco Construction, Inc. v. Department of Land Conservation & Development

56 Or. App. 32 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 22, 1982

Board of Comm. of Clackamas County v. LCDC, 35 Or App 725, 732 , 582 P2d 59 (1978); Hawkins v. Board of Medical Examiners, 23 Or App 320, 322 , 542 P2d 152 (1975). … of Comm. of Clackamas County v.

Higgins v. Schramm Plastics

112 Or. App. 563 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 22, 1992

The Board awarded $2,000. … Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Fillmore, 98 Or App 567, 571 , 779 P2d 1102 , rev den 308 Or 608 (1989); see also Diamond Fruit Growers v. Davies, 103 Or App 280 , 796 P2d 1248 (1990).

Matter of Compensation of Hicks

57 Or. App. 68 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 23, 1982

Claimant appeals the order of the Workers’ Compensation Board which affirmed and adopted the opinion and order of the referee. … She relies on Wilson v. SAIF, 48 Or App 993 , 618 P2d 473 (1980), where we stated: “The situation with which we are confronted is one in which there are competing policy considerations.

Hill v. Employment Division

73 Or. App. 422 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 1, 1985

See, e.g., Ashmore v. Employment Division, 70 Or App 516 , 690 P2d 522 (1984); Lewis v. Employment Division, 66 Or App 303 , 673 P2d 1376 (1984); Petro v. Employment Division, 32 Or App 17 , 573 P2d 1250 (1978). … See Ashmore v. Employment Division, supra; Lewis v. Employment Division, supra; Bremer v. Employment Divison, 47 Or App 1131 , 615 P2d 1170 (1980).

Sedgwick Claims Management Services v. Norwood

275 Or. App. 718 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 30, 2015

In Roberts v. … See Sather v.

Jordan v. SAIF Corp.

86 Or. App. 29 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 24, 1987

The Board affirmed, adopting the referee’s opinion. The medical treatment is compensable if the injury of 1980 continues to be a material contributing cause of the wrist condition. ORS 656.245; see Taylor v. … See Weiland, v. SAIF, 64 Or App 810 , 669 P2d 1163 (1983).

Coddington v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

68 Or. App. 439 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 23, 1984

The Board also thought that Dr. Altizer’s testimony was not consistent with the facts of claimant’s return to school bus driving and her motorcycle travel during the same period. In Grable v. … The Board misinterpreted Dr. McGee’s testimony.

Sandoval v. James Kjelde Dairy

156 Or. App. 430 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 7, 1998

Campos v. Hood River Care Center, 104 Or App 261, 264 , 799 P2d 1152 (1990). … Topolic v. SAIF, 122 Or App 94, 97 , 857 P2d 152 (1993). In its order, the Board referred to a May 1996 report in which claimant was diagnosed with a pain syndrome.

Beebe v. Phibbs Logging & Cutting

94 Or. App. 542 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 21, 1988

The Board has jurisdiction to review the amount that a referee awards a claimant for attorney fees, so long as the employer has sought Board review on the merits of the claim. Greenslitt v. … In Vip’s Restaurant v.

State v. Washington

214 Or. App. 467 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 15, 2007

App. 467 STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Edward T. WASHINGTON, Defendant-Appellant. 050545423; A130430. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Submitted on Record and Briefs July 6, 2007. … Brown, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General, and Michael R.

Vestal v. Barrett Business Services

164 Or. App. 733 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 5, 2000

ORS 656.005(13); see Trabosh v. Washington County, 140 Or App 159 , 915 P2d 1011 (1996). … Claimant also did not argue, at the Board or on review, that Allen was a party to the employment contract because he was an agent for an undisclosed principal. See Salem Tent & Awning v.

Tri-Met, Inc. v. Lamb

193 Or. App. 564 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 9, 2004

Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Hayes, 325 Or 592, 596 , 943 P2d 197 (1997). The requirement that the injury occur “in the course of’ the employment relates to the time, place, and circumstances of the injury. Krushwitz v. … In support of its assertion, employer cites Alltucker v. City of Salem, 164 Or App 643 , 993 P2d 159 (1999).

State v. Rickerd

124 Or. App. 552 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 17, 1993

ORAP 5.45(2); State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). … State v. Gouveia, 116 Or App 86 , 840 P2d 753 (1992). We reject defendant’s suggestion that we employ the “most convenient remedy” by simply deleting the word “determinate” from his sentence.

Fifth Avenue Corp. v. Washington County

28 Or. App. 485 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 14, 1977

On November 27, 1973, the Board adopted a new comprehensive plan for the county. … See, e.g., Gayton Triangle Land Co. v. Board of Supervisors, 216 Va 764, 222 SE2d 570 (1976) (variance procedures not followed).

SAIF Corp. v. Holmstrom

113 Or. App. 242 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 27, 1992

SAIF asked the Board to reconsider that portion of its order. … The Board’s authority is limited by statute. It has authority to determine matters concerning a claim. ORS 656.704; EBI Companies v. Kemper Group Insurance, 92 Or App 319 , 758 P2d 406 , rev den 307 Or 145 (1988).