Case law

E. A. R. v. R. B. E.

327 Or. App. 614 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 23, 2023

Brown v. Taylor, 22 Or App 219, 224, 538 P2d 1268, rev den (1975) (quoting Dunne v. McCashum, 13 Or App 66, 70-71, 508 P2d 821 (1973) (citation omitted)). … See, e.g., Hairston v. Threets, 105 Or App 350, 353-55, 804 P2d 1213 (1991); Brown, 22 Or App at 225.

Welches School District No. 13 v. Welches Education Ass'n

116 Or. App. 564 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 25, 1992

ORS 183.480; City of Hermiston v. ERB, 280 Or 291, 293-94 , 570 P2d 663 (1977); Assoc. of Engineering Employes v. … U of O Chapter, AFT v. U of O, 92 Or App 614, 617-19 , 759 P2d 1112 (1988); OSEA v. Deschutes County, 40 Or App 371, 376 , 595 P2d 501 (1979).

Lee v. Mitchell

152 Or. App. 159 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 21, 1998

However, in Delaney v. … In O’Toole v.

Sutton v. Dennis 7 Dees Landscape

170 Or. App. 314 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 11, 2000

See Sedgwick James of Oregon v. … Stepp v. SAIF, 304 Or 375, 380 , 745 P2d 1207 (1987).

Or. ASS'N OF REHAB. PROF. v. Dept. of Ins.

99 Or. App. 613 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 13, 1989

Brown, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Enfield, Guimond & Brown, Salem. Robert M. Atkinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. … In George et al v.

Keeney v. University of Oregon

178 Or. App. 198 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 28, 2001

Tanner v. OHSU, 157 Or App 502 , 971 P2d 435 (1998). … The trial court agreed and, citing Ososke v.

State v. Brownlie

149 Or. App. 58 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 2, 1997

“ [Deputy] She reached in and handed me I believe it was a brown, small — little brown clutch purse. It was a zippered purse. … State v. Baldwin, 76 Or App 723, 726 , 712 P2d 120 (1985), rev den 301 Or 193 (1986); State v. Tallman, 76 Or App 715, 719-20 , 712 P2d 116 (1985); see also State v.

Funk v. Multnomah Education Service District

79 Or. App. 17 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 23, 1986

The basis for the Board’s decision was that the proposed boundary change was “likely to adversely affect” the Jackson reorganization plan. ORS 330.090(4)(d). 1 In School Dist. No. 1 v. Mult. Co. Educ. Serv. … No. 1 v. Linn Boundary Bd., 244 Or 207 , 416 P2d 656 (1966).

La Grande Police Ass'n v. Hamilton

56 Or. App. 133 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 1, 1982

In City of La Grande v. Firefighters, 51 Or App 403 , 626 P2d 1 , rev den 292 Or 334 (1981), and in City of La Grande v. … In City of Roseburg v.

Hunt v. Garrett Freightliners

92 Or. App. 40 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 6, 1988

In this workers’ compensation case, claimant seeks review of the Board’s order which denied his request for insurer-paid attorney fees on the ground that his participation at the hearing was nominal only. … See Wilson v. Geddes, 90 Or App 64 , 750 P2d 1182 (1988); Anfora v. Liberty Communications, 88 Or App 30 , 744 P2d 265 (1987); Petshow v. Farm Bureau Ins.

Steamboaters v. Winchester Water Control District

69 Or. App. 596 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 5, 1984

Relying on our decision in Sun Ray Dairy v. … See also Megdal v. Board of Dental Examiners, 288 Or 293 , 605 P2d 273 (1980). If the rubric of ORS 537.170(1) stood alone, we might agree with Steamboaters.

Les Schwab Warehouse Center v. SAIF Corp.

190 Or. App. 338 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 29, 2003

In this case, it is not possible to determine if the board applied the correct legal standard to determine whether Les Schwab is responsible for claimant’s condition. The board, citing to Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. … We remand this case to the board to consider this case under the appropriate legal standard, as prescribed by Reynolds Metals. See Richey v.

Harmon v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

54 Or. App. 121 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 5, 1981

We are treating the claim as an appeal from a determination order. 1 We affirm the Workers’ Compensation Board’s (Board) denial of the claim, although for reasons different from those of the Board. … Austin v. SAIF, 48 Or App 7, 12 , 615 P2d 1188 (1980).

Bohnke v. Employee Benefits Insurance

55 Or. App. 977 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 8, 1982

The extent of permanent partial disability here, in our view, is greater than awarded by the Board. … See Wilson v Weyerhaeuser, 30 Or App 403, 409 , 567 P2d 567 (1977). Since 1978, claimant has failed to make reasonable efforts to become employed in a non-medical job.

State v. Smith

260 Or. App. 183 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 18, 2013

See State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990) (error is not plain if the matter is reasonably in dispute). … As we stated in State v.

Shed Cafe v. Employment Division

30 Or. App. 639 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 17, 1977

Petitioner, an employer, appeals from an order of the Employment Appeals Board affirming the decisions of the administrator and the referee and holding that a former employe was not disqualified from receiving unemployment … See Babcock v. Employment Division, 25 Or App 661 , 550 P2d 1233 (1976); Geraths v. Employment Division, 24 Or App 201 , 544 P2d 1066 (1976).

School District No. 1 v. Nilsen

17 Or. App. 601 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 17, 1974

Hutchison v. Lake Oswego School Dist. No. 7, supra at 10. In Green v. Waterford Board of Education, 473 F2d 629 (2d Cir 1973), the plaintiff was a nontenured teacher employed by the defendant school board. … No. 1 v.

Daniel v. State Accident Insurance Fund

33 Or. App. 179 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 13, 1978

This is a review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board denying the claimant’s request to reopen her claim. … Dinnocenzo v. SAIF, 18 Or App 63, 67-8 , 523 P2d 1280 (1974). Two expert witnesses presented evidence by report. Claimant relies upon the report of Dr.

Rivera v. City of Gresham

157 Or. App. 199 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 18, 1998

When confronted with terms of art, the board may be entitled to consult reference works to the extent that the information in them otherwise would be subject to judicial notice. SAIF v. … Bend Millwork v. Dept. of Revenue, 285 Or 577, 584 , 592 P2d 986 (1979); see also Creasey v. Hogan, 292 Or 154, 169 , 637 P2d 114 (1981).

Columbia Heating & Cooling, Inc. v. Bucher

191 Or. App. 135 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 26, 2003

Petitioners first argue that the board erred in determining that claimant did not have a combined condition and second argues that the board abused its discretion by issuing its order in the absence of a board member with … There is substantial evidence in the record supporting the board’s findings. Our recent decision, Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. v.