Case law

In re the Marriage of Harris

104 Or. App. 209 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 24, 1990

Street v. … Appellant points to McQuary v.

Green v. Douglas County

245 Or. App. 430 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 8, 2011

(quoting Weeks v. … See Gould v.

Poole v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

69 Or. App. 503 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 29, 1984

We agree with the Board that SAIF is not responsible for Dr. Nickila’s bills. … See EBI Companies v. Thomas, 66 Or App 105, 111 , 672 P2d 1241 (1983); see also Kosanke v. SAIF, 41 Or App 17 , 596 P2d 1013 (1979).

Griffin v. Employment Division

55 Or. App. 768 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 2, 1982

Our conclusion that the referee’s analysis was fatally flawed requires a remand to the Board. See, e.g., Martinez v. Employment Division, 54 Or App 95 , 634 P2d 269 (1981). … Petitioner sought review by the Employment Appeals Board (Board) which, with one member dissenting, adopted the referee’s opinion. Our discussion of the case will utilize the referee’s opinion as the operative document.

Pacific Motor Trucking Co. v. Standley

93 Or. App. 204 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 28, 1988

The Board affirmed. Employer does not challenge the extent of claimant’s disability. … ORS 656.273; see Grabie v. Weyerhaeuser Company, 291 Or 387 , 631 P2d 768 (1981); Crumley v. Combustion Engineering, 92 Or App 439 , 758 P2d 878 (1988).

Rivers v. SAIF Corp.

256 Or. App. 838 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 30, 2013

We address claimant’s arguments in turn, reviewing the board’s order for legal error, as well as for substantial evidence and reason. ORS 183.482(8); SAIF v. Ramos, 252 Or App 361, 363 , 287 P3d 1220 (2012). … See Tye v.

Saif Corp. v. O'neal

134 Or. App. 338 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 17, 1995

O’Neal v. Tewell, 119 Or App 329 , 850 P2d 1144 (1993). … However, it is unnecessary to address SAIF’s challenge to the rule on this basis, because neither the Board nor we rely on it to authorize the Board’s action here. See Weyerhaeuser Co. v.

SAIF Corp. v. Otwell

251 Or. App. 704 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 15, 2012

The administrative law judge (ALJ) affirmed the order on reconsideration, and SAIF requested board review of the ALJ’s decision. See ORS 656.289(3) (providing for board review of ALJ orders pursuant to ORS 656.295). … For example, in SAIF v.

Ladd v. Hikes

55 Or. App. 801 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 2, 1982

With him on the brief was Flinn, Brown & Roseta, Eugene. Before BUTTLER, P.J., WARDEN, J., and HOLMAN, Senior Judge. [*] HOLMAN, Senior Judge. … See, e.g., North Pacific Lumber Co. v.

State ex rel. Willamette Community Health Solutions v. Lane County

274 Or. App. 545 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 28, 2015

Springfield Utility Board v. Emerald PUD, 339 Or 631, 642 , 125 P3d 740 (2005). That principle of statutory construction, however, is not a rule of law, but merely a guide to determining the legislature’s intent. … Columbia River Television v. Multnomah Co., 299 Or 325, 333 , 702 P2d 1065 (1985).

Henthorn v. Grand Prairie School District, No. 14

44 Or. App. 215 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 28, 1980

, "[w]ere review limited to the record, plaintiff would be denied any possibility of showing these procedural irregularities” which were encompassed by her petition for the writ. 3 She points to this language from Bienz v. … If that is true, then she was denied the opportunity guaranteed her by ORS 342.835(2) to be heard on the bases for the "cause [the district Board] may deem in good faith sufficient [to] refuse to renew” her contract.

Helmer v. State Accident Insurance Fund

17 Or. App. 448 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 20, 1974

Sahnow v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 3 Or App 164 , 470 P2d 378 (1970), aff'd 260 Or 564 , 491 P2d 997 (1971).” Cardwell v. SAIF, 6 Or App 175, 180 , 486 P2d 587 , Sup Ct review denied (1971). … See Schwehn v. SAIF, 17 Or App 50, 520 P2d 467 , Sup Ct review denied (1974). Reversed.

Jones v. Willamette United Football Club

307 Or. App. 502 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 18, 2020

In this case, we review a final order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA). … Nicklaus v.

Rivera v. City of Gresham

157 Or. App. 199 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 18, 1998

When confronted with terms of art, the board may be entitled to consult reference works to the extent that the information in them otherwise would be subject to judicial notice. SAIF v. … Bend Millwork v. Dept. of Revenue, 285 Or 577, 584 , 592 P2d 986 (1979); see also Creasey v. Hogan, 292 Or 154, 169 , 637 P2d 114 (1981).

Audas v. State Accident Insurance Fund

43 Or. App. 813 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 24, 1979

Potterf v. SAIF, 41 Or App 755 , 598 P2d 1290 , rev den (1979); Briggs v. … . *817 We agree with the Board that the medical evidence does not justify an award for permanent total disability.

State v. Washington

561 P.2d 644 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 21, 1977

While I think State v. Mancuso, 25 Or. … NOTES [1] See State v. Brown, 262 Or. 442 , 497 P.2d 1191 (1972); State of Oregon v. McCormack, 8 Or. 236 (1880). See also Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436 , 90 S.Ct. 1189 , 25 L.Ed.2d 469 (1970). [2] In State v.

State v. Kline

37 Or. App. 899 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 1978

State v. Steele, supra, 33 Or App at 497 . … See State v. Steele, supra. Cf. State v. Girard, 34 Or App 85 , 578 P2d 415 (1978). This case presents a situation analogous to those in State v. Girard, supra, and State v.

State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department of Multnomah County v. Cornett

121 Or. App. 264 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 23, 1993

"C: Brown house. "Weir: In the brown house? Were there different rooms in the brown house? "C: [Nods yes.] "Weir: What room did it happen in? "C: Mom's. "Weir: In mom's room. And where in mom's room did it happen, [C]? … Weir decided to videotape her next session with the girl. [4] The videotape *185 shows C, the foster mother and Weir playing a board game.

Petix v. Gillingham

325 Or. App. 157 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 5, 2023

Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 449, 648 P2d 1289 (1982) (citations omitted). … Brown, 293 Or at 449.

Hurlburt v. Tecton Laminates Corp.

135 Or. App. 202 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 21, 1995

PER CURIAM Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board, contending that the Board erred in affirming the referee’s order that failed to award her permanent and total disability. We affirm. … See Wilson v.