Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.70s
73 Or. App. 159 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 10, 1985
The Board reversed, holding that Action Ambulance was the only employer. … Petitioner raises as error the Board’s award of attorney fees to claimant for services performed before the Board on review.
Cited 2 timesPublished334 Or. App. 735 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 5, 2024
They also argued that, under our decision in Marks v. … Friends of Yamhill County v. Board of Commissioners, 351 Or 219, 251-52, 264 P3d 1265 (2011) (so noting); Manchester Solar v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedReed v. DEL CHEMICAL CORPORATION
26 Or. App. 733 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 13, 1976
SAIF, 13 Or App 298 , [ 509 P2d 1215 (1973),] and Seaberry v. … See Leech v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 254 Or 351 , 458 P2d 438 , 460 P2d 359 (1969).
Cited 5 timesPublished156 Or. App. 331 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 30, 1998
Brown, 310 Or at 355 . … State v.
Cited 2 timesPublished13 Or. App. 519 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 25, 1973
Subsequently, the Board notified Mrs. … Dicta in Groff v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedJohnson v. Beaver Coaches, Inc.
147 Or. App. 234 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 19, 1997
PER CURIAM Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that upheld the denial of his left knee injury claim on the grounds that he failed to carry his burden of proof by showing that his injury “arose … Norpac Foods, Inc. v. Gilmore, 318 Or 363 , 867 P2d 1373 (1994). That conclusion is supported by substantial evidence. Affirmed.
Cited 1 timesPublished160 Or. App. 197 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 28, 1999
State v. Meyrick, 313 Or 125, 133 , 831 P2d 666 (1992). The court permitted defendant’s attorney to withdraw on the day of trial. … See, e.g., State v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedRoseburg Forest Products v. Hardenbrook-Hardy
216 Or. App. 112 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 7, 2007
Roseburg appealed to the board. On appeal, the board, with one member dissenting, affirmed. Roseburg then filed this petition for judicial review. … Thomas Creek Lumber v. Board of Forestry, 188 Or App 10, 22 , 69 P3d 1238 (2003). See also PGE v.
Cited 1 timesPublished56 Or. App. 169 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 8, 1982
See Stipe v. First Nat Bank, 208 Or 251, 262 , 301 P2d 175 (1956) (the “ultimate determination of the sufficiency of the search” is entirely within the discretion of the trial court). … time the Board shall set a payment schedule as provided by ORS 144.275.
Cited 1 timesPublishedPickell v. Oregon Mutual Insurance
109 Or. App. 439 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 30, 1991
In Oregon Insurance Guaranty Assoc. v. … In Aetna Life and Casualty v.
Cited 2 timesPublished334 Or. App. 725 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 5, 2024
See James v. … See Harryman v.
Cited 1 timesPublished243 Or. App. 409 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 15, 2011
Woodward — a board-certified orthopedic surgeon — as an expert witness. Woodward had reviewed the perpetuation deposition testimony of plaintiffs surgeon. … See State v.
Cited 0 timesPublished63 Or. App. 280 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 25, 1983
Claimant appeals an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirming the referee’s award of 80 percent scheduled disability for an injury to his right knee. … Some compelling basis must exist for remanding, Buster v. Chase Bag Co., 14 Or App 323 , 513 P2d 504 (1973); Tanner v. PSC Tool Co., 9 Or App 463 , 497 P2d 1230 (1972), and we find none. Affirmed.
Cited 1 timesPublished38 Or. App. 487 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 20, 1979
State v. Brown, 262 Or 442 , 497 P2d 1191 (1972). This right is enforced by an absolute bar to subsequent prosecutions. State v. Boyd, 271 Or 558 , 533 P2d 795 (1975). … Fitzgerald, 267 Or 266 , 516 P2d 1280 (1973) , or to sever the charges and risk a claim of former jeopardy, State v. Brown, supra, was described in State v. Boyd, supra.
Cited 0 timesPublishedNV Transport, Inc. v. V & Y Horizon, Inc.
302 Or. App. 707 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 11, 2020
Brown v. Gatti, 341 Or 452, 458, 145 P3d 130 (2006). Plaintiff has pleaded its defama- tion claim as a defamation per se. … Brown, 341 Or at 459. Defendants have not addressed the potential defamatory implication of the statement to the recipient. Fogel’s statement, viewed in the 716 NV Transport, Inc. v. V & Y Horizon, Inc.
Cited 2 timesPublished4 Or. App. 9 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 16, 1970
On appeal therefrom the circuit court affirmed the order of the board. Claimant appeals. … The board concluded that the work of Tilley Farm Service was an activity incidental to farming and that Glen Tilley, the employer, was therefore engaged “in only one occupation”— farming. Babb v.
Cited 1 timesPublished62 Or. App. 62 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 2, 1983
We conclude that under Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., 280 Or 95 , 570 P2d 52 (1977), defendant is not entitled to a jury trial under Oregon Constitution, Article I, Section 11. … See Brown v. Multnomah County Dist.
Cited 3 timesPublished119 Or. App. 466 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 21, 1993
The Board said: “It is well settled that the employer is hable for the natural consequences flowing from a compensable injury. Williams v. Gates McDonald & Co., 300 Or 278, 281 [, 709 P2d 712 ] (1985); Pattitucci v. … Grace v. SAIF, 76 Or App 511, 517 , 709 P2d 1146 (1985). We addressed a similar problem in Magana v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEdward Hines Lumber Co. v. Kephart
90 Or. App. 637 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 20, 1988
Edward Hines Lumber Co. v. Kephart, 81 Or App 43 , 724 P2d 837 (1986). On remand, after allowing employer to respond, the Board adhered to and republished its prior order awarding claimant PTD benefits. … Detailing the facts of this case would not aid the Board or the bar. See Hoag v. Duraflake, 37 Or App 103 , 585 P2d 1149 , rev den 284 Or 521 (1978).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDavis v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.
63 Or. App. 245 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 11, 1983
Claimant appeals the Workers’ Compensation Board’s order reinstating and affirming SAIF’s denial of the claim. The Board reversed the referee’s order that SAIF accept the claim as nondisabling. … See Hannan v. Good Samaritan Hosp., 4 Or App 178 , 471 P2d 831 , 487 P2d 931 (1970), rev den (1971).
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna