Case law

Saunders v. State Accident Insurance Fund

40 Or. App. 169 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 14, 1979

In Brady v. Gen. Acc. Assur. Co., 29 Or App 357 , 563 P2d 763 (1977), the above question of limited reviewability was not raised. … The same thing occurred in Leaton v. SAIF, 27 Or App 669 , 556 P2d 1375 rev den (1977).

Liberty Northwest Insurance v. Oregon Steel Mills

105 Or. App. 547 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 13, 1991

American Steel contends, relying on Armstrong v. … See Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Kearns, 70 Or App 583 , 690 P2d 1068 (1984); see also Smith v. Ed’s Pancake House, 27 Or App 361 , 556 P2d 158 (1976).

Poole v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

69 Or. App. 503 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 29, 1984

We agree with the Board that SAIF is not responsible for Dr. Nickila’s bills. … See EBI Companies v. Thomas, 66 Or App 105, 111 , 672 P2d 1241 (1983); see also Kosanke v. SAIF, 41 Or App 17 , 596 P2d 1013 (1979).

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Crisp

150 Or. App. 361 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 1, 1997

See Deluxe Cabinet Works v. Messmer, 140 Or App 548 , 915 P2d 1053 , rev den 324 Or 305 (1996). … The Board must reconsider the claim in light of that amendment. Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Whitesides Hardware, Inc. v. City of Corvallis

68 Or. App. 204 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 9, 1984

Heritage Enterprises (Heritage) petitions for judicial review of a Land Use Board of Appeals opinion remanding two Corvallis ordinances to the city for reconsideration. White-sides Hardware, Inc. … See Fujimoto v. Land Use Board of Appeals, 52 Or App 875 , 630 P2d 364 , rev den 291 Or 662 (1981). LUBA should have denied all the assignments of error. *207 Reversed on the petition; affirmed on the cross-petition.

Ponder v. Employment Department

171 Or. App. 435 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 13, 2000

The term “good cause” is one of delegation, see Springfield Education Assn. v. … McPherson v. Employment Division, 285 Or 541, 550 , 591 P2d 1381 (1979).

Frey v. Willamette Industries, Inc.

13 Or. App. 449 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 14, 1973

See Templeton v. Pope and Talbot, Inc., 7 Or App 119 , 490 P2d 205 (1971). … The Sandowl [sic] opinion [Sandow v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 252 Or 377 , 449 P2d 426 (1969)] is not in point.

Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.

118 Or. App. 517 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 10, 1993

Relying on Stark v. … Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc., supra; State v. Brown, supra. We turn to the merits. The argument on defendant’s motion for judgment n.o.v. focused on whether Dotson v.

Pacific Motor Trucking Co. v. Standley

93 Or. App. 204 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 28, 1988

The Board affirmed. Employer does not challenge the extent of claimant’s disability. … ORS 656.273; see Grabie v. Weyerhaeuser Company, 291 Or 387 , 631 P2d 768 (1981); Crumley v. Combustion Engineering, 92 Or App 439 , 758 P2d 878 (1988).

Monroe v. City of Corvallis

347 Or. App. 70 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 11, 2026

We cite to the current versions. 74 Monroe v. … See Alfieri v.

City of Beaverton v. International Ass'n of Fire Fighters

20 Or. App. 293 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 10, 1975

In Boyle v. … In Lines v.

Americold Corp. v. Hoyt

209 Or. App. 243 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 15, 2006

Montez, 324 Or 343, 347 , 927 P2d 64 (1996), cert den, 520 US 1233 (1997) (quoting State v. Pratt, 316 Or 561, 569 , 853 P2d 827 (1993)); see also Kuhn v. SAIF, 73 Or App 768, 772 , 700 P2d 253 (1985). … Nelson v. Emerald People’s Utility District, 318 Or 99, 103 , 862 P2d 1293 (1993).

Bi-Mart Corp. v. Hardin

205 Or. App. 454 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 3, 2006

The board affirmed. … See Coleman v. SAIF, 203 Or App 442 , 125 P3d 845 (2005); Cummings v. SAIF, 197 Or App 312 , 105 P3d 875 (2005). We review the board’s determination whether employer met that burden of proof for substantial evidence.

Bostick v. Ron Rust Drywall

138 Or. App. 552 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 24, 1996

We affirm the Board and write only to explain our understanding of ORS 656.210(3). … Cutright v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 299 Or 290 , 702 P2d 403 (1985); Stiennon v. SAIF, 68 Or App 735, 738 , 683 P2d 556 , rev den 298 Or 238 (1984).

State v. Alonzo

249 Or. App. 149 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 28, 2012

Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990) (describing the factors that appellate courts consider to review plain error). … See State v.

Batdorf v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

54 Or. App. 496 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 2, 1981

The Board discredited Dr. … Because we find a compensable injury, this case is reversed and remanded to the Board with instructions that the claim be accepted and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 1 See Rogers v.

State v. Worsham

332 Or. App. 154 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 24, 2024

See State v. … In State v.

Rivers v. SAIF Corp.

256 Or. App. 838 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 30, 2013

We address claimant’s arguments in turn, reviewing the board’s order for legal error, as well as for substantial evidence and reason. ORS 183.482(8); SAIF v. Ramos, 252 Or App 361, 363 , 287 P3d 1220 (2012). … See Tye v.

Wasson v. Evanite Fiber Corp.

117 Or. App. 246 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 16, 1992

The Board found that her depression has worsened since the DCS; however, it ruled that it was not compensable, because it was the same condition that had been denied in the DCS. Under Proctor v. … Substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that the depression was the same.

Matter of Compensation of Russ

60 Or. App. 292 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 18, 1983

The employer seeks reversal of the Workers’ Compensation Board’s order affirming the referee’s finding that the claimant’s hip injury from an “unexplained fall” was compensable. We affirm. … Rogers v. SAIF, supra.