Case law

State v. Miller

53 Or. App. 493 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 10, 1981

State v. Freeman, 232 Or 267, 272 , 374 P2d 453 (1962); State v. McDonald, 231 Or 24, 46 , 361 P2d 1001 (1962). … On the booking sheet that the officer himself signed, the color of his hair is pictured as reddish brown or sandy brown. Mr. Miller’s hair is blond.

Kalmiopsis Audubon Society v. Division of State Lands

66 Or. App. 810 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 8, 1984

See, e.g., Perry v. Oregon Liquor Commission, 180 Or 495, 498-99 , 177 P2d 406 (1947); Whipple v. … In Saxon v.

Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.

103 Or. App. 508 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 3, 1990

This case is on remand from the Supreme Court, Garcia v. … In our first opinion we erroneously substituted our judgment for that of the Board. Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp., 94 Or App 362 , 765 P2d 1245 (1988). We now affirm the referee’s order.

De Bay v. Wild Oats Market, Inc.

244 Or. App. 443 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 20, 2011

See Lamson v. Crater Lake Motors, Inc., 346 Or 628, 639-40 , 216 P3d 852 (2009). Compare Roberts v. Oregon *449 Mutual Ins. … In any event, plaintiff acknowledges that, in Carlson v.

Clelland v. Cilione

178 Or. App. 493 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 2001

Argonaut Insurance v. King, 63 Or App 847 , 666 P2d 865 (1983). … The Board also failed to make findings on the jurisdictional issue. Because “the Board must provide a ‘sufficient explanation to allow a reviewing court to examine the agency’s action!,]’ ” SAIF v.

Slaughter v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

60 Or. App. 610 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 8, 1982

The Workers’ Compensation Board reversed, citing Hackney v. Tillamook Growers Coop., 39 Or App 655 , 593 P2d 1195 , rev den 286 Or 449 (1979). … Hackney v. Tillamook Growers Coop, supra, 39 Or App at 659 . The Board found the present case to be a “carbon copy” of Hackney.

Coopman v. City of Eugene

Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 12, 2023

No appearance for respondents Al Johnson, Eliza Kashinsky, Joshua Kashinsky, Anne Brown, Patty Hine, Isaac Judd, Angie R. … See Stop the Dump Coalition v.

Jorgenson v. Schiedler

87 Or. App. 100 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 26, 1987

Priest v. Cupp, 24 Or App 429, 431 , 545 P2d 917 , rev den (1976). 1 Failure to provide such care entitles a prisoner to habeas corpus relief if there is no other timely remedy available. … See Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, 283 Or 21, 27-28 , 581 P2d 934 (1978); Mueller v. Cupp, supra n 1.

Akey v. Employment Department

234 Or. App. 393 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 24, 2010

Employment Division v. Western Graphics Corporation, 76 Or App 608 , 710 P2d 788 (1985). … See Hayes Oyster Co. v.

Ebbe v. Senior Estates Golf and Country Club

61 Or. App. 398 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 19, 1983

In Johnson v. … In Huff v.

Knope v. Fhuere

332 Or. App. 97 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 17, 2024

State v. McLain, 158 Or App 419, 426, 974 P2d 727 (1999). … Although the statute stated that a person who was con- victed of murder was required to serve a minimum term before being released, we explained that the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board) had no legal authority

Compensation of Sandstrum v. State Accident Insurance Fund

46 Or. App. 773 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 23, 1980

Claimant appeals from that portion of an order by the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) affirming the referee’s order and ruling that SAIF did not act unreasonably in withholding the benefits, and thus that claimant was … Norgard v. Rawlinsons, 30 Or App 999, 1003 , 569 P2d 49 (1977).

Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.

94 Or. App. 362 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 14, 1988

AMFAC, Inc. v. Ingram, supra, 72 Or App at 171 n 2. … The opinion and order of the referee, which the Board affirmed without opinion, is adequate for judicial review under ORS 656.298. George v. Richard’s Food Center, 90 Or App 639 , 752 P2d 1309 (1988).

Oliver v. SAIF Corp.

82 Or. App. 270 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 12, 1986

We reverse the Board and reinstate the referee’s order. … Subsequently, the Board and we upheld the compensability of the “anxiety stress reaction.” Oliver v. SAIF, 66 Or App 972 , 675 P2d 620 (1984).

Canales-Robles v. Laney

314 Or. App. 413 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 9, 2021

Schaefer v. Oregon Aviation Board, 312 Or App 316, 332, 495 P3d 1267, adh’d to as modified on recons, 313 Or App 725, 492 P3d 782 (2021) (quoting State v. Gaines, 346 Or 160, 171, 206 P3d 1042 (2009)). … Relying on Bartz and Brown, we concluded that the public nature of those statutes meant that the grounds for relief 424 Canales-Robles v.

Maarefi v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

69 Or. App. 527 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 29, 1984

Claimant also appeals the Board’s determination that she did not file a valid aggravation claim after her claim was closed. We affirm. … See, e.g., Trevino v. SAIF, 66 Or App 410 , 673 P2d 1389 (1984); Wetzel v. Goodwin Brothers, 50 Or App 101 , 622 P2d 750 (1981); Anderson v. West Union Village Square, 44 Or App 685 , 607 P2d 196 (1980); Dinnocenzo v.

Prewitt v. State Accident Insurance Fund

16 Or. App. 208 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 21, 1974

The duty to construe the law liberally in favor of the workman gives neither the Hearing Officer or the Board authority to alter it. Allen v. SIAC, 200 Or 521 , 265 P2d 1086 (1954). … Tucker v.

Fenn v. Charles T. Parker Construction Company

6 Or. App. 412 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 12, 1971

On appeal to the Workmen’s Compensation Board the denial of the claim was affirmed by a two-to-one decision. The claimant appealed to the circuit court, which reversed the board and held the claim compensable. … In Livingston v. State Ind. Acc.

Nicholson v. Salem Area Transit

126 Or. App. 172 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 26, 1994

We have disposed of most of the issues that claimant raises in Hathaway v. Health Future Enterprises, 125 Or App 549 , 865 P2d 503 (1993). … Claimant contends that the Board’s ruling that claimant has no right to a hearing on palliative care disputes violates the United States and Oregon constitutions.

CENTRAL PT. SCH. DIST. v. Emp. Relations Bd.

555 P.2d 1269 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 8, 1976

555 P.2d 1269 (1976) 27 Or.App. 285 CENTRAL POINT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 6, Petitioner, v. Employment Relations Board, and District 6 Education Association, Respondents. Court of Appeals of Oregon. … Assn. v. Sch. Dist., 24 Or. App. 751, 760 , 547 P.2d 647 ; 25 Or. App. 407 , 549 P.2d 1141 , Sup.Ct. review denied (1976).