Case law

Rogers v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

82 Or. App. 46 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 29, 1986

Claimant’s first assignment is that the Board erred in reinstating the denial, which was entered after formal acceptance and more than 60 days after employer’s notice and knowledge of the claim. He relies on Bauman v. … Bauman v. SAIF, supra, 295 Or at 793 .

Hughes v. Employment Division

30 Or. App. 483 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 17, 1977

Claimant appeals from an order of the Employment Appeals Board affirming a finding of the referee that he did not have good cause for a delayed filing of his request for a hearing to challenge his disqualification for unemployment … There being substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision we are required to affirm. Our role is not to re-weigh the evidence. Wright v. Employment Division, 24 Or App 323 , 545 P2d 613 (1976). Affirmed.

Peacock v. Maass

99 Or. App. 680 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 13, 1989

See Gage v. Maass, 306 Or 196, 204 , 759 P2d 1049 (1988); Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, 283 Or 21, 28 , 581 P2d 934 (1978). … See Kinney v. Maass, 98 Or App 590 , 779 P2d 632 (1989); Cf. Peacock v. Maass, 99 Or App 678 , 783 P2d 1043 (1989). Affirmed.

Zottola v. THREE RIVERS SCHOOL DISTRICT

202 Or. App. 235 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 12, 2005

App. 235 Sherry ZOTTOLA, Petitioner, v. THREE RIVERS SCHOOL DISTRICT and Fair Dismissals Appeals Board, Respondent. FDA-01-5; A122463. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted August 17, 2005. … Seibel v. Liberty Homes, Inc., 305 Or. 362 , 752 P.2d 291 (1988); Filter v. City of Vernonia, 95 Or.App. 550 , 770 P.2d 83 (1989); German Auto Parts, Inc. v. BOLI, 111 Or.App. 522 , 826 P.2d 1026 (1992). Affirmed.

Paillette v. Employment Division

59 Or. App. 598 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 13, 1982

In Stevenson v. … See, Swift & Co. and Armour & Co. v. Peterson, 192 Or 97 , 233 P2d 216 (1951).” 17 Or App at 431 .

Maguire v. Clackamas County

250 Or. App. 146 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 31, 2012

In Welch v. … See Marolla v.

STATE, DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCES v. Williams

12 Or. App. 133 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 2, 1973

This conclusion is consistent with the opinion in Wagner v. Columbia Hospital Dist., 259 Or 15 , 485 P2d 421 (1971), and spelled out in more detail in the opinions in Skidmore, Owings & Merrill v. … Co., 25 Conn Supp 76, 197 A2d 83 (Super Ct 1963); Thorgaard Plumbing v. County of King, 71 Wash 2d 126, 426 P2d 828 (1967); Madison v. Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation, 20 Wis 2d 361 , 122 NW2d 409 , 20 ALR3d 545 (1963).

Lang v. Oregon-Idaho Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church

173 Or. App. 389 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 4, 2001

Stone-Fox, Inc. v. … We accordingly limit our discussion of the October 1997 agreement to the question of contract formation and do not address whether the Board’s minutes satisfy the statute of frauds. See State v.

State v. Rubio

248 Or. App. 130 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 15, 2012

See, e.g., *139 State v. … State v. Edson, 329 Or 127, 139 , 985 P2d 1253 (1999). Cf. State v.

Gilroy v. General Distributors

35 Or. App. 361 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 1, 1978

EBI appealed to the circuit court which affirmed the Board’s order. Employer appeals, contending that the Board and the circuit court erred in finding claimant had suffered a new injury. In Smith v. … He apparently relies on the concurring opinion in Blair v.

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. McCullough

80 Or. App. 98 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 18, 1986

See Bales v. SAIF, 294 Or 224 , 656 P2d 300 (1982); Clayton v. Compensation Department, 253 Or 397 , 454 P2d 628 (1969). … The Board’s ruling concluding that the attack was compensable is based on the same reasoning, in spite of the fact that the Board expressly concluded that the medical opinions were in equipoise.

Golden West Homes v. Hammett

82 Or. App. 63 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 29, 1986

The Board affirmed as to EOSH but held petitioner responsible. … (Quoting the Board.) In Hallmark Furniture v.

Troxel v. Maass

120 Or. App. 397 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 19, 1993

Compare Bedell v. Schiedler, 307 Or 562 , 770 P2d 909 (1989). … See Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, 283 Or 21, 29 , 581 P2d 934 (1978). Petitioner’s remaining claims also do not state a claim for relief.

Armstrong v. Rogue Federal Credit Union

145 Or. App. 268 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 24, 1996

Barnes v. City of Portland, 120 Or App 24, 28-29 , 852 P2d 265 , rev den 317 Or 583 (1993). … or by a judicial opinion regarding a finding of the Board.”

Meyer v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

71 Or. App. 371 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 19, 1984

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board upholding SAIF’s denial of benefits for claimant’s asbestosis. … The Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed.

Lavelle-Hayden v. Employment Dept.

326 Or. App. 490 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 22, 2023

As the Supreme Court held in Heller v. … See, e.g., Sherbert v.

Krajacic v. Blazing Orchards

84 Or. App. 127 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 25, 1987

Haret v. SAIF, supra, 72 Or App at 672 . … SAIF concedes that the Board erred in refusing to pay for out-of-state chiropractic care. Reynaga v. Northwest Farm Bureau, 300 Or 255 , 709 P2d 1071 (1985).

Jorgenson v. Schiedler

87 Or. App. 100 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 26, 1987

Priest v. Cupp, 24 Or App 429, 431 , 545 P2d 917 , rev den (1976). 1 Failure to provide such care entitles a prisoner to habeas corpus relief if there is no other timely remedy available. … See Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, 283 Or 21, 27-28 , 581 P2d 934 (1978); Mueller v. Cupp, supra n 1.

Khosroabadi v. North Clackamas Parks and Rec. Dist.

347 Or. App. 465 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 25, 2026

See West Linn Corporate Park v. … See Rogue Valley Sewer Services v.

Syphers v. K-W Logging, Inc.

51 Or. App. 769 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 20, 1981

Claimant appeals a determination by the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) affirming the dismissal of his claim for aggravation because of the lack of timely filing of the request for hearing. … See Johnson v. Assured Employed, 277 Or 11, 14-16 , 558 P2d 1228 (1977) (civil appeal prior to a final order does not ripen into proper appeal on the entry of a final order, and court lacked jurisdiction). Affirmed.