Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.49s
STATE, DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCES v. Williams
12 Or. App. 133 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 2, 1973
This conclusion is consistent with the opinion in Wagner v. Columbia Hospital Dist., 259 Or 15 , 485 P2d 421 (1971), and spelled out in more detail in the opinions in Skidmore, Owings & Merrill v. … Co., 25 Conn Supp 76, 197 A2d 83 (Super Ct 1963); Thorgaard Plumbing v. County of King, 71 Wash 2d 126, 426 P2d 828 (1967); Madison v. Frank Lloyd Wright Foundation, 20 Wis 2d 361 , 122 NW2d 409 , 20 ALR3d 545 (1963).
Cited 5 timesPublishedMeyer v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.
71 Or. App. 371 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 19, 1984
Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board upholding SAIF’s denial of benefits for claimant’s asbestosis. … The Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed.
Cited 6 timesPublishedLang v. Oregon-Idaho Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church
173 Or. App. 389 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 4, 2001
Stone-Fox, Inc. v. … We accordingly limit our discussion of the October 1997 agreement to the question of contract formation and do not address whether the Board’s minutes satisfy the statute of frauds. See State v.
Cited 6 timesPublished248 Or. App. 130 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 15, 2012
See, e.g., *139 State v. … State v. Edson, 329 Or 127, 139 , 985 P2d 1253 (1999). Cf. State v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedGilroy v. General Distributors
35 Or. App. 361 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 1, 1978
EBI appealed to the circuit court which affirmed the Board’s order. Employer appeals, contending that the Board and the circuit court erred in finding claimant had suffered a new injury. In Smith v. … He apparently relies on the concurring opinion in Blair v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedCalpine Energy Solutions LLC v. Pub. Util. Comm'n of Or.
298 Or. App. 143 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 19, 2019
See, e.g. , Gearhart v. PUC , 255 Or. … ."); Wah Chang v. PUC , 256 Or.
Cited 4 timesPublishedWeyerhaeuser Co. v. McCullough
80 Or. App. 98 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 18, 1986
See Bales v. SAIF, 294 Or 224 , 656 P2d 300 (1982); Clayton v. Compensation Department, 253 Or 397 , 454 P2d 628 (1969). … The Board’s ruling concluding that the attack was compensable is based on the same reasoning, in spite of the fact that the Board expressly concluded that the medical opinions were in equipoise.
Cited 1 timesPublished51 Or. App. 769 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 20, 1981
Claimant appeals a determination by the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) affirming the dismissal of his claim for aggravation because of the lack of timely filing of the request for hearing. … See Johnson v. Assured Employed, 277 Or 11, 14-16 , 558 P2d 1228 (1977) (civil appeal prior to a final order does not ripen into proper appeal on the entry of a final order, and court lacked jurisdiction). Affirmed.
Cited 5 timesPublished82 Or. App. 63 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 29, 1986
The Board affirmed as to EOSH but held petitioner responsible. … (Quoting the Board.) In Hallmark Furniture v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedLavelle-Hayden v. Employment Dept.
326 Or. App. 490 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 22, 2023
As the Supreme Court held in Heller v. … See, e.g., Sherbert v.
Cited 5 timesPublished120 Or. App. 397 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 19, 1993
Compare Bedell v. Schiedler, 307 Or 562 , 770 P2d 909 (1989). … See Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, 283 Or 21, 29 , 581 P2d 934 (1978). Petitioner’s remaining claims also do not state a claim for relief.
Cited 10 timesPublishedArmstrong v. Rogue Federal Credit Union
145 Or. App. 268 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 24, 1996
Barnes v. City of Portland, 120 Or App 24, 28-29 , 852 P2d 265 , rev den 317 Or 583 (1993). … or by a judicial opinion regarding a finding of the Board.”
Cited 1 timesPublished52 Or. App. 379 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 26, 1981
The Supreme Court stated in Jarvill v. … In Porter v.
Modified on other grounds by Nicoll v. City of Eugene, 53 Or. App. 528 (1981)Cited 4 timesPublished84 Or. App. 127 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 25, 1987
Haret v. SAIF, supra, 72 Or App at 672 . … SAIF concedes that the Board erred in refusing to pay for out-of-state chiropractic care. Reynaga v. Northwest Farm Bureau, 300 Or 255 , 709 P2d 1071 (1985).
Modified by Krajacic v. Blazing Orchards, 85 Or. App. 477 (1987)Cited 5 timesPublishedMcDevitt v. Employment Division
27 Or. App. 253 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 1, 1976
Petitioner appeals from a decision of the State Employment Appeals Board denying his claim for unemployment compensation benefits. 1 Adopting the decision of its Referee as "correct, proper, and complete,” the Board specifically … Ashby v. Employment Division, 21 Or App 265 , 534 P2d 1160 (1975).
Cited 2 timesPublishedKhosroabadi v. North Clackamas Parks and Rec. Dist.
347 Or. App. 465 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 25, 2026
See West Linn Corporate Park v. … See Rogue Valley Sewer Services v.
Cited 0 timesPublished99 Or. App. 680 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 13, 1989
See Gage v. Maass, 306 Or 196, 204 , 759 P2d 1049 (1988); Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, 283 Or 21, 28 , 581 P2d 934 (1978). … See Kinney v. Maass, 98 Or App 590 , 779 P2d 632 (1989); Cf. Peacock v. Maass, 99 Or App 678 , 783 P2d 1043 (1989). Affirmed.
Cited 1 timesPublished308 Or. App. 362 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 30, 2020
State v. … Coverstone, 260 Or App 714, 715, 320 P3d 670 (2014) (quot- ing State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355, 800 P2d 259 (1990)). 364 State v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedMcFarlane v. Pony Express Courier Corp.
184 Or. App. 461 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 23, 2002
In State v. … State v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBear Springs Forest Products v. Mullins
99 Or. App. 455 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 22, 1989
The Board held that employer’s letter was a partial denial that failed to comply with the requirements stated in its opinion in Bryan D. … We reversed that decision in Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Warrilow, 96 Or App 34 , 771 P2d 295 , rev den 308 Or 184 (1989), holding that a partial denial is legally sufficient if it is clear what portion of the claim is denied.
Cited 2 timesPublished
Ask Donna