Case law

Carlson v. Piper Aircraft Corp.

57 Or. App. 695 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 9, 1982

In Lobel v. … Civil Aeronautics Board, Legislative Program, 86th Cong 2d Session, Item 5, p 14.

Thomas v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

73 Or. App. 128 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 10, 1985

In the original judicial review, claimant focused on his contention that the Board erred in not remanding the case for the taking of additional evidence; he also contended that the Board erred in affirming the referee’s order … The Board appears to have agreed with that assessment of the record. The Supreme Court, in Barrett v.

Zurita v. Canby Nursery

115 Or. App. 330 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 30, 1992

The Board ruled that the excluded reports should have been admitted. … As we noted in Miller v.

Duncan v. Law Enforcement Council

37 Or. App. 119 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 14, 1978

See, e.g., Smith v. Peet, 29 Or App 625 , 564 P2d 1083 , rev den (1977). However, an agency will not be given deference to embroider the rules another agency has established in accordance with statutes. Paul v. … See, e.g., Portland Fish Co. v. States Steamship Co., 510 F2d 628 (9th Cir 1974); State ex rel Kvaalen v. Graybill, 159 Mont 190 , 496 P2d 1127 (1972); Montoya v. Moore, 77 N M 326, 422 P2d 363 (1967).

Haugen v. Beautique a Go-Go

18 Or. App. 132 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 22, 1974

In Patitucci v. … Kehoe v. Ind. Accident Com., 214 Or 629 , 332 P2d 91 (1958); Keefer v. State Ind. Acc. Commission, 171 Or. 405 , 135 P2d 806 (1943).’ Watson v.

Frazer v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.

278 Or. App. 409 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 18, 2016

also, e.g., SAIF v. … Bank v.

Hannan v. Good Samaritan Hospital

4 Or. App. 178 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 11, 1970

State v. … The hearing officer and board determinations were both made prior to the decision in Ryf v.

Gronquist v. State Accident Insurance Fund

25 Or. App. 27 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 5, 1976

The Board and circuit court affirmed on the merits. … Co. v. Anderson, 167 Or 686, 697 , 120 P2d 578 (1941). But this is not the end of the inquiry.

State v. Gaylor

24 Or. App. 933 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 29, 1976

State v. Johnson, 10 Or App 353 , 499 P2d 348 , Sup Ct review denied (1972); State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Brown, 19 Or App 427 , 528 P2d 569 (1974), Sup Ct review denied, cert denied 42 US 1003 (1975). See also, State v. … Brown, 9 Or App 137 , 495 P2d 304 , Sup Ct review denied (1972); State v. Keiper, 8 Or App 354 , 493 P2d 750 , Sup Ct review denied (1972).

Erickson v. Employment Division

29 Or. App. 893 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 27, 1977

Petitioner appeals from an order of the Employment Appeals Board (Board) reversing the referee and denying unemployment benefits, holding that petitioner was discharged for misconduct connected with his work. … Grigsby v. Employment Div., 24 Or App 499 , 546 P2d 788 (1976).

Wilton v. Employment Division

26 Or. App. 549 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 23, 1976

The referee held that she did; the Employment Appeals Board held that she did not. The Employment Appeals Board exercises do novo review of the decision of the referee. Stevenson v. … Grigsby v. Employment Div., 24 Or App 499 , 546 P2d 788 (1976). The relevant findings of the Employment Appeals Board are supported by substantial evidence and we cannot disturb them.

State v. Robbins

3 Or. App. 472 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 2, 1970

State v. Brown, 1 Or App 322 , 461 P2d 836 (1969) Sup Ct review denied; State v. Johnson, 232 Or 118 , 374 P2d 481 (1962). … State v. Edwards, 3 Or App 179 , 471 P2d 843 Sup Ct review denied (1970). Since the car was properly entered, the evidence was admissible.

Peterson v. Employment Division

39 Or. App. 49 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 5, 1979

If the Board determines that the evidence is competent *54 under ORS 183.450(1), 1 then it should be received unless the Board determines it to be cumulative in that the Board is already persuaded by the preceding evidence … Co. v. Peterson, 280 Or 773, 779 , 572 P2d 1023 (1977). Reversed and remanded.

Wilkins v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

66 Or. App. 420 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 11, 1984

Subsequent to our decision in this case, the Supreme Court issued Bauman v. … Miller v. Granite Construction Co., 28 Or App 473, 477 , 559 P2d 944 (1977).

Liberty Northwest Insurance v. Samel

199 Or. App. 540 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 18, 2005

It draws no distinction between cases that the Board decides on the merits and those that are resolved on some other basis.” See also SAIF v. … The board’s award of attorney fees is not an increase in compensation. Dotson v. Bohemia, Inc., 80 Or App 233, *544 236 , 720 P2d 1345 , rev den, 302 Or 35 (1986); see also Farmers Ins. Group v.

Golden West Homes v. Hammett

82 Or. App. 63 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 29, 1986

The Board affirmed as to EOSH but held petitioner responsible. … (Quoting the Board.) In Hallmark Furniture v.

MILLERSBURG DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. Mullen

14 Or. App. 614 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 28, 1973

In McManus v. … It is suggested by petitioners that it is judicial in nature, like that of local govern *622 ment boards sitting in individual zoning, matters. In Fasano v. Washington Co.

McBroom v. Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.

77 Or. App. 700 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 12, 1986

Slaughter v. SAIF, supra, 60 Or App at 615 ; see Hackney v. … Boyd v. Francis Ford, Inc., supra.

Barnett v. City of Salem

238 Or. App. 577 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 10, 2010

Brown v. J. C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 705 , 688 P3d 811 (1984). Plaintiff, as appellant, must provide an appellate record sufficient for us to determine whether the trial court erred as she claims. … See Watts v.

Luoto v. Long Creek School District No. 17

89 Or. App. 34 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 23, 1987

This assistance may be requested by the teacher or as deemed necessary by the Board.” … Dist. v. N. Clackamas Ed. Assn., supra: “[I]n Central Point Sch. Dist. v.