Case law

1000 Friends of Or. v. Jackson Cnty.

292 Or. App. 173 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 31, 2018

See Bellikka v. … State v.

Davidson v. Employment Division

48 Or. App. 119 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 2, 1980

Here, as in Bremer v. … McCann v. OLCC, [supra], 27 Or App 487, 493 ; Home Plate, Inc. v. OLCC, 20 Or App 188, 190-91 , 530 P2d 862 (1975). * * Donnell v. Briggs, 37 Or App 823 , 588 P2d 650 (1978).

Schimschok v. Employment Division

53 Or. App. 593 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 24, 1981

Because we find that the employer-employe relationship considered by the Board was not the petitioner’s last employment, we reverse the Board. … In Gollender v.

Carlson v. AFSCME

73 Or. App. 755 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 22, 1985

As the Supreme Court observed in Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, supra, line drawing is no easy task. Each expenditure must be separately examined. … See Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, supra, 431 US at 237-242 .

Jellum v. State Accident Insurance Fund

31 Or. App. 1127 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 12, 1977

Claimant appeals from an order of the circuit court affirming an order on review of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board). … Jenkins v. SAIF, 21 Or App 447, 451 , 535 P2d 124 (1975). Affirmed.

Carothers v. Robert Westlund Construction

149 Or. App. 457 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 20, 1997

The Board found and concluded: “Claimant began working for an Oregon employer in April 1995 as a carpenter. … We cannot determine from the Board’s opinion whether a majority of the Board would have found claimant to be a subject Oregon worker under the correct test, and, therefore, remand is necessary.

Copenhaver v. Copenhaver

15 Or. App. 142 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 29, 1973

Brown v. Brown, 2 Or App 123, 125 , 467 P2d 119 (1970). … Unander v. Unander, 265 Or 102, 107 , 506 P2d 719 (1973); Prime v. Prime, 172 Or 34, 42-6 , 139 P2d 550 (1943).

Martinez v. Martinez

234 Or. App. 289 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 10, 2010

On de novo review, see Rosiles-Flores v. … Sarty v. Forney, 12 Or App 251, 253 , 506 P2d 535 (1973).

Jackson v. Tillamook Growers Co-Op

39 Or. App. 247 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 19, 1979

The sole issue before us is whether the Board was correct in deciding that claimant was not subject to coverage under the Oregon Workers’ Compensation Act at the time of his injuries. … Kolar v. B & C Contractors, 36 Or App 65, 69-70 , 583 P2d 562 (1978).

State v. Lambert

227 Or. App. 614 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 22, 2009

State v. Thompson, 328 Or 248, 256 , 971 P2d 879 , cert den, 527 US 1042 (1999). … See Royal Aloha Partners v.

Frazer v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co.

278 Or. App. 409 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 18, 2016

also, e.g., SAIF v. … Bank v.

Zurita v. Canby Nursery

115 Or. App. 330 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 30, 1992

The Board ruled that the excluded reports should have been admitted. … As we noted in Miller v.

Colvin v. Industrial Indemnity

83 Or. App. 73 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 17, 1986

We affirmed the Board order, holding that the claim was time-barred, because the employer had no knowledge of the injury within the meaning of ORS 656.265(4)(a). 2 Colvin v. … Rogers v. SAIF, 289 Or 633, 642 , 616 P2d 485 (1980). We cited with approval Larson’s tests in Richmond v.

Shady Cove Water District v. Jackson County

218 Or. App. 292 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 27, 2008

See Links v. Anderson, 86 Or 508, 521-22 , 168 P 605 (1917) (nonprejudicial irregularities not grounds for invalidation); Tazwell v. … Hughes v. State of Oregon, 314 Or 1, 13 , 838 P2d 1018 (1992); Johnson et al. v.

Compensation of McCarter v. Crown Zellerbach Corp.

45 Or. App. 905 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 14, 1980

Since Crown was not a party to case no. 77-2965, the only matter before the Board, the Board lacked jurisdiction over Crown on review. … Atwood/Christensen v. SAIF, 30 Or App 1009 , 569 P2d 52 , rev den (1977); Giese v. Safeway Stores, 10 Or App 452 , 499 P2d 1364 , 501 P2d 982 (1972).

State v. Harvey

284 Or. App. 548 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 22, 2017

See State v. … We rejected that argument in State v.

Phillips v. Gibson

133 Or. App. 760 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 19, 1995

Saga Enterprises, Inc. v. Coldwell, Banker and Co., 287 Or 169, 180 , 598 P2d 285 (1979). … Bollenback v. Continental Casualty Co., 243 Or 498, 510 , 414 P2d 802 (1966). Intent to rescind is not the issue; the real question is whether plaintiffs actions met the legal standard for rescission. Stovall v.

City of Lake Oswego v. Stafford

169 Or. App. 179 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 12, 2000

State v. … The city compares the circumstances here with those in State v. Brown, 141 Or App 156, 162-63 , 917 P2d 527 , rev den 323 Or 691 (1996). However, Brown is distinguishable.

SAIF Corp. v. Frank

153 Or. App. 514 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 22, 1998

In Fred Meyer, Inc. v. … SAIF relies on Stepp v.

Erickson v. Employment Division

29 Or. App. 893 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 27, 1977

Petitioner appeals from an order of the Employment Appeals Board (Board) reversing the referee and denying unemployment benefits, holding that petitioner was discharged for misconduct connected with his work. … Grigsby v. Employment Div., 24 Or App 499 , 546 P2d 788 (1976).