Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersorctapp

10,000+ results

1.02s

  • Pilgrim v. Clatskanie People's Utility District

    149 Or. App. 234 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 16, 1997

    See generally Shaw v. … See, e.g., State ex rel Kane v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Kim v. Mt. Hood Community College

    95 Or. App. 406 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 1, 1989

    Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200 , 752 P2d 312 (1988), requires that the Board provide “a reasoned opinion based on explicit findings of fact.” 90 Or App at 205 . … The Board adopted the referee’s opinion and order. We assume that it approved his findings and conclusions. See George v. Richard’s Food Center, 90 Or App 639 , 752 P2d 1309 (1988).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND CORP. v. Varner

    89 Or. App. 421 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 10, 1988

    Henderson’s opinion, claimant’s preexisting disorder “materially worsened” as a result of vocational stress. *424 The Board held that our opinion in Adsitt v. … See Weller v. Union Carbide, 288 Or 27 , 602 P2d 259 (1979).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Logsdon v. SAIF Corp.

    181 Or. App. 317 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 8, 2002

    He argues that, under Koskela v. … Applying the familiar three-part analysis of Mathews v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Liberty Northwest Insurance v. Damm

    107 Or. App. 764 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 19, 1991

    The Board affirmed the referee but, citing its opinion in Donna E. … Reversed and remanded for reconsideration in the light of Aetna Casualty Co. v. Aschbacher, 107 Or App 494 , 812 P2d 844 (1991).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Newton v. Family Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

    48 Or. App. 373 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 22, 1980

    On July 21, 1975, at a special meeting of the board of directors, the board requested plaintiff’s resignation. He resigned the following day. … Shires v. Cobb, 271 Or 769 , 534 P2d 188 (1975) and Page v. Cameron, 33 Or App 441 , 576 P2d 837 (1978).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Deaton v. State Accident Insurance Fund

    13 Or. App. 298 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 14, 1973

    In Jenness v. … To the same effect see Surratt v. Gunderson Bros., 259 Or 65 , 485 P2d 410 (1971).

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • Martinez v. Martinez

    234 Or. App. 289 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 10, 2010

    On de novo review, see Rosiles-Flores v. … Sarty v. Forney, 12 Or App 251, 253 , 506 P2d 535 (1973).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Avalos v. Bowyer

    89 Or. App. 546 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 10, 1988

    ORS 656.273(3); Garbutt v. SAIF, 297 Or 148 , 681 P2d 1149 (1984). … Claimant’s reliance on Bono v. SAIF, 298 Or 405 , 692 P2d 606 (1984), for his claim of interim compensation is misplaced.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Whipple v. Oregon School Activities Ass'n

    52 Or. App. 419 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 26, 1981

    See Goss v. Lopez, supra; Perry v. Sindermann, supra; Board of Regents v. Roth, supra; Walsh v. Louisiana High Sch. Athletic Ass’n., 616 F2d 152 (5th Cir 1980); Mitchell v. … Perry v. Oregon Liquor Comm., 180 Or 495 , 177 P2d 406 (1947); Harris v. Board of Parole, 47 Or App 289 , 614 P2d 602 (1980).

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • State v. Rives

    292 Or. App. 8 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 23, 2018

    The Supreme Court allowed review and vacated and remanded for reconsideration in light of State v. Haugen , 361 Or. 284 , 392 P.3d 306 (2017) ( Haugen II ). State v. … State v. Hickman , 355 Or. 715 , 724, 330 P.3d 551 (2014).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Deason v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District

    241 Or. App. 510 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 16, 2011

    .); Ken-Ten Coach Co. v. … See Snider v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Greenwade v. State Accident Insurance Fund

    41 Or. App. 697 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 27, 1979

    The referee and the Workers’ Compensation Board denied the claim on the basis of the prior settlement. Claimant appeals. … He argues that the order is defective and must be set aside, citing Petty v. SAIF, 6 Or App 636 , 488 P2d 1201 , rev den (1971).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Margolin v. Employment Division

    31 Or. App. 597 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 15, 1977

    See Stromberg v. Employment Div., 25 Or App 455 , 549 P2d 686 (1976). … Romanosky v. Employment Div., 21 Or App 785, 788 , 536 P2d 1277 (1975). *[600] Claimant contends that his refusal to travel was a "minor peccadillo” and thus did not constitute misconduct. See Dietz v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Noyce

    285 Or. App. 741 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 24, 2017

    State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). … State v. Runnels, 283 Or App 512, 515-16 , 390 P3d 1120 (2017).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Pendergrass v. State

    74 Or. App. 209 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 3, 1985

    The Supreme Court allowed defendants’ petition for review and remanded this appeal to us for reconsideration in the light of Miller v. Grants Pass Irrigation, 297 Or 312 , 686 P2d 324 (1984). Pendergrass v. … See Bradford v. Davis, 290 Or 855, 864-65 , 626 P2d 1376 (1981).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Plummer

    160 Or. App. 275 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 28, 1999

    In our prior opinion, State v. … In State v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Seidl v. Dick Niles, Inc.

    18 Or. App. 332 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 12, 1974

    The trial court upheld the Board’s conclusion. … White v. S.I.A.C., 236 Or 444 , 389 P2d 310 (1964); Davis v. SAIF, 15 Or App 405 , 515 P2d 1333 (1973). Cf., Casper v. SAIF, 13 Or App 464 , 511 P2d 451 (1973); Boyd v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • A. v. A.

    15 Or. App. 353 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 28, 1973

    Brown v. Brown, 4 Or App 621, 625 , 481 P2d 643 (1971). … Ballard v. Ballard, 233 Or 74 , 377 P2d 24 (1962); Mace v. Mace, supra; Amundson v. Amundson, 7 Or App 33 , 489 P2d 983 (1971). As our Supreme Court said in Henry v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Hoffman v. Deschutes County

    237 Or. App. 531 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 29, 2010

    Petitioners sought LUBA’s review of the board’s order, and Latham cross-petitioned for review. … For those reasons, LUBA, citing this court’s decision in *539 Siporen v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.