Case law

Oregon School Employees Ass'n v. Salem-Keizer School District 24J

103 Or. App. 221 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 29, 1990

See Fadeley v. Oregon Government Ethics Commission, 30 Or App 795, 801 , 568 P2d 687 (1977). … U* * * * * “(3) Where the board finds that the person named in the complaint has not engaged in or is not engaging in an unfair labor practice, the board shall: “(a) Issue an order dismissing the complaint * * ORS 183.450

State v. Plummer

160 Or. App. 275 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 28, 1999

In our prior opinion, State v. … In State v.

Voelz Oil & Land Survey, Inc. v. Oregon State Fire Marshal

138 Or. App. 100 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 29, 1995

Citing Stelljes/Dumler v. State Board of Parole, 307 Or 365 , 769 P2d 177 (1989), and Shetterly, Irick & Shetterly v. Emp. … Compton v. Weyerhaeuser, 302 Or 366, 367 , 730 P2d 540 (1986), (overruled on other grounds by statute as stated in Fromme v. Fred Meyer, 306 Or 558, 560 , 761 P2d 515 (1988)).

Lederer v. Viking Freight, Inc.

195 Or. App. 94 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 1, 2004

Employer petitions for reconsideration of our opinion in Lederer v. Viking Freight, Inc., 193 Or App 226 , 89 P3d 1199 (2004), raising three arguments. … Indeed, the board characterized the issue as “whether claimant was entitled to temporary disability for a claim reopened for processing of new medical conditions found compensable after claim closure.”

Fisher v. BELLEQUE

237 Or. App. 405 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 29, 2010

In Brown v. … Brown, 131 Or App at 361 .

Ainsworth v. SAIF Corp.

202 Or. App. 708 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 23, 2005

The Workers’ Compensation Board (board), applying OAR 436-035-0390, awarded benefits based on 50 percent impairment. … In Planned Parenthood Assn. v.

Compensation of McCarter v. Crown Zellerbach Corp.

45 Or. App. 905 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 14, 1980

Since Crown was not a party to case no. 77-2965, the only matter before the Board, the Board lacked jurisdiction over Crown on review. … Atwood/Christensen v. SAIF, 30 Or App 1009 , 569 P2d 52 , rev den (1977); Giese v. Safeway Stores, 10 Or App 452 , 499 P2d 1364 , 501 P2d 982 (1972).

Botefur v. City of Creswell

84 Or. App. 627 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 8, 1987

Silsby v. SAIF, 39 Or App 555 , 592 P2d 1074 (1979). … Norgard v. Rawlinsons, 30 Or App 999 , 569 P2d 49 (1977).

Margolin v. Employment Division

31 Or. App. 597 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 15, 1977

See Stromberg v. Employment Div., 25 Or App 455 , 549 P2d 686 (1976). … Romanosky v. Employment Div., 21 Or App 785, 788 , 536 P2d 1277 (1975). *[600] Claimant contends that his refusal to travel was a "minor peccadillo” and thus did not constitute misconduct. See Dietz v.

Fechtig v. City of Albany

150 Or. App. 10 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 17, 1997

“ORS 197.830(14)(b) requires this Board to award attorney fees against a party whose appeal is not supported by probable cause. … See Pfeifer v.

Newport Elks Club v. Hays

92 Or. App. 604 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 24, 1988

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board which reversed the referee’s decision upholding employer’s “backup denial.” … In Ebbtide Enterprises v.

Long v. Industrial Indemnity Co.

20 Or. App. 24 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 14, 1975

see Hamilton v. … “The order of the Compensation Board * * * is affirmed. Affirmed.

State v. M. T. F.

Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 14, 2023

See Kragt v. Board of Parole, 325 Or App 688, ___ P3d ___ (2023). … The main difference between this case and Brown is 380 State v. M. T. F.

Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Duwe

75 Or. App. 493 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 2, 1985

See also Lemmons v. Zurich Insurance Company, 403 F2d 512 (5th Cir 1968). In Hadrick v. … In contrast to Bruce v.

Johnson v. STATE, HWY. DIV. OF DEPT. OF TRANSP

556 P.2d 724 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 29, 1976

Huff v. Duncan, 263 Or. 408 , 411-12 and n. 2, 502 P.2d 584 (1972); see Updegrave v. Agee, 258 Or. 599 , 484 P.2d 821 (1971); Hudspeth v. Eastern Oregon Land Co., 247 Or. 372 , 430 P.2d 353 (1967). … As the Illinois court observed in Gibson v.

State v. Wright

128 Or. App. 88 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 25, 1994

At sentencing, the trial court imposed a condition of incarceration and stated that it would recommend conditions of post-prison supervision to the Parole Board. … At the sentencing hearing, the court stated that it would recommend post-prison conditions to the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision.

Munson v. Valley Energy Investment Fund, U. S., LP

264 Or. App. 679 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 13, 2014

Then, in November 2008, Munson was terminated as CEO and board chairman; he remained a member of the board. Warburton replaced Munson as CEO, and Owens replaced him as chairman of the board. … Serv. v.

Kuralt v. SAIF Corp. (In re Kuralt)

290 Or. App. 479 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 28, 2018

On employer's appeal, the board reversed the ALJ, relying on our opinion in Riddel v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. , 8 Or. App. 438 , 494 P.2d 901 (1972). … In Sekermestrovich v.

von Kohlbeck v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

68 Or. App. 272 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 9, 1984

Verment v. Nordstrom-Best, 20 Or App 261 , 531 P2d 288 , rev den (1975). … determination is made. * * *” Harwell v.

Keller v. SAIF Corp.

175 Or. App. 78 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 27, 2001

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board, asserting that the Board erred in concluding that his claim for a work-related injury was barred as untimely. … Co. v.