Case law

State v. Lulay

290 Or. App. 282 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 14, 2018

See State v. … evaluate Brown's credibility.").

Jones v. State Accident Insurance Fund

40 Or. App. 311 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 14, 1979

The matter was reviewed by the Board, which eliminated the penalty and attorney’s fee and affirmed the order in all other respects. … Norgard v. Rawlinsons, 30 Or App 999, 1003 , 569 P2d 49 (1977). The penalty and the attorney’s fee were therefore warranted. Reversed.

A. v. A.

15 Or. App. 353 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 28, 1973

Brown v. Brown, 4 Or App 621, 625 , 481 P2d 643 (1971). … Ballard v. Ballard, 233 Or 74 , 377 P2d 24 (1962); Mace v. Mace, supra; Amundson v. Amundson, 7 Or App 33 , 489 P2d 983 (1971). As our Supreme Court said in Henry v.

Smith v. Oregon State Department of Corrections

103 Or. App. 447 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 12, 1990

PER CURIAM To the extent that petitioners challenge the rule-making process, the authority for the rules and the implementation of the rules, the issues in this case are resolved by Clark v.

Lepage v. Rogue Valley Medical Center

166 Or. App. 627 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 19, 2000

Claimant seeks judicial review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) denying his aggravation claim. … See also SAIF v. January, 166 Or App 620 , 998 P2d 1286 (2000).

Liberty Northwest Insurance v. Damm

107 Or. App. 764 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 19, 1991

The Board affirmed the referee but, citing its opinion in Donna E. … Reversed and remanded for reconsideration in the light of Aetna Casualty Co. v. Aschbacher, 107 Or App 494 , 812 P2d 844 (1991).

State v. Plummer

160 Or. App. 275 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 28, 1999

In our prior opinion, State v. … In State v.

Voelz Oil & Land Survey, Inc. v. Oregon State Fire Marshal

138 Or. App. 100 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 29, 1995

Citing Stelljes/Dumler v. State Board of Parole, 307 Or 365 , 769 P2d 177 (1989), and Shetterly, Irick & Shetterly v. Emp. … Compton v. Weyerhaeuser, 302 Or 366, 367 , 730 P2d 540 (1986), (overruled on other grounds by statute as stated in Fromme v. Fred Meyer, 306 Or 558, 560 , 761 P2d 515 (1988)).

Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Weaver

81 Or. App. 493 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 8, 1986

See Bracke v. Baza’r, 293 Or 239 , 646 P2d 1330 (1982); Fred Meyer v. Benjamin Franklin Savings & Loan, 73 Or App 795 , 700 P2d 257 , rev den 300 Or 162 (1985). … Liability for the disability caused by the underlying disease was fixed when the disability arose, Bracke v.

Oregon School Employees Ass'n v. Salem-Keizer School District 24J

103 Or. App. 221 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 29, 1990

See Fadeley v. Oregon Government Ethics Commission, 30 Or App 795, 801 , 568 P2d 687 (1977). … U* * * * * “(3) Where the board finds that the person named in the complaint has not engaged in or is not engaging in an unfair labor practice, the board shall: “(a) Issue an order dismissing the complaint * * ORS 183.450

Johnson v. Eastern Oregon State College

159 Or. App. 663 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 14, 1999

PER CURIAM Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board reversingan administrative law judge’s (AL J) order awarding claimant permanent total disability for her work-related condition. … Claimant’s first contention, that the procedure set forth in ORS 656.283(7) violates her right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, has been addressed and rejected in Koskela v.

Dept. of Human Services v. J. S.

339 Or. App. 695 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 16, 2025

“The other option will be to continue our hearing until we get someone on board for you. … State v.

Margolin v. Employment Division

31 Or. App. 597 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 15, 1977

See Stromberg v. Employment Div., 25 Or App 455 , 549 P2d 686 (1976). … Romanosky v. Employment Div., 21 Or App 785, 788 , 536 P2d 1277 (1975). *[600] Claimant contends that his refusal to travel was a "minor peccadillo” and thus did not constitute misconduct. See Dietz v.

Bahr v. Marion County

38 Or. App. 597 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 20, 1979

"R "At all times material to this action, each of the above listed Defendants was a public official acting in the capacity of a member of the Board of Commissioners of Marion County, State of Oregon under authority granted … Bryan v. Cupp, 1 Or App 52 , 458 P2d 697 (1969). We hold that the trial court erred in striking plaintiffs second amended complaint.

Ingram v. SAIF Corp.

72 Or. App. 215 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 20, 1985

Claimant petitions for review of a Board order that denied compensation for a heart condition. … See Lines v. SAIF, 54 Or App 81 , 634 P2d 262 (1981). Affirmed.

Lederer v. Viking Freight, Inc.

195 Or. App. 94 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 1, 2004

Employer petitions for reconsideration of our opinion in Lederer v. Viking Freight, Inc., 193 Or App 226 , 89 P3d 1199 (2004), raising three arguments. … Indeed, the board characterized the issue as “whether claimant was entitled to temporary disability for a claim reopened for processing of new medical conditions found compensable after claim closure.”

Bennett v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.

128 Or. App. 71 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 25, 1994

The Board affirmed and adopted the referee’s order. It relied on Garcia v. … See Bracke v.

Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Hanks

122 Or. App. 582 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 25, 1993

In Safeway Stores v. … The Board rejected that argument, and we concur.

Munsey v. PLUMBERS'LOCAL NO. 151

85 Or. App. 396 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 6, 1987

In Textile Workers v. … Cf., Brown v. Transcon Lines, 284 Or 597, 607-609 , 588 P2d 1087 (1978). The state has a substantial interest in protecting the integrity of its workers’ compensation system.

Hill v. Qwest

178 Or. App. 137 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 14, 2001

In Granner v. … In Freightliner Corp. v.