Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.06s
244 Or. App. 177 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 13, 2011
Claimant appealed to the board. The board did not adopt the ALJ’s findings and conclusion but, instead, simply affirmed the ALJ’s order without opinion. … Claimant sought reconsideration, which the board denied because claimant “failed to identify a material error of fact or law.” This case is materially indistinguishable from Opp v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRiverbend Landfill Co. v. Yamhill County
314 Or. App. 79 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 18, 2021
(Riverbend) sought approval from the Yamhill County Board of Commissioners (county) to expand its solid waste landfill. … Stop the Dump Coalition v. Yamhill County, 364 Or 432, 434, 435 P3d 698 (2019) (SDC II).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBeaver State Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Douglas County
187 Or. App. 241 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 3, 2003
In February 2002, the board of county commissioners held a hearing on the issue. … As the term “advisory opinion” is ordinarily used, it refers to constitutional limitations on the judiciary’s authority, see Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedEugene Education Ass'n v. Eugene School District 4J
58 Or. App. 140 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 8, 1982
In support of his ruling, the arbitrator relied on this Board’s holding in Eugene Education Association v. Eugene School District No. 4J, Case No. … In Brewer v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedHelberg v. Civil Service Commission
10 Or. App. 62 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 7, 1972
In McAlpine v. … Accord: City of Asbury Park v. Dept. of Civil Service, 17 NJ 419, 111 A2d 625 (1955). To the same effect see Jaquith v. Hartley, 243 Or 27 , 411 P2d 274 (1966); State ex rel. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMartin v. Douglas County Lumber Co.
4 Or. App. 69 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 23, 1970
In Uris v. … . * * *” In Hannan v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedHackney v. Tillamook Growers Co-Op.
39 Or. App. 655 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 23, 1979
Claimant appeals from a Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) order denying benefits for an injury he sustained while arm wrestling with a fellow employee. We affirm. … The sole issue is whether the "arm wrestling” arose in the course of claimant’s employment as required by ORS 656.005(8)(a). 2 In Simons v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedCarlson v. Piper Aircraft Corp.
57 Or. App. 695 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 9, 1982
In Lobel v. … Civil Aeronautics Board, Legislative Program, 86th Cong 2d Session, Item 5, p 14.
Cited 12 timesPublishedStandard Insurance v. Washington County
93 Or. App. 78 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 14, 1988
See West Hills & Island Neighbors v. Multnomah Co., 68 Or App 782, 787 , 683 P2d 1032 , rev den 298 Or 150 (1984). … See McCoy v. Linn County, 90 Or App 271 , 752 P2d 323 (1988), and authorities there cited.
Cited 3 timesPublished87 Or. App. 475 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 16, 1987
McGarry v. SAIF, 24 Or App 883, 888 , 547 P2d 654 (1976). The referee concluded that the operation was reasonable and necessary, but the Board did not agree. … See Schuening v. J. R. Simplot & Company, 84 Or App 622 , 735 P2d 1 , rev den 303 Or 590 (1987).
Cited 2 timesPublished113 Or. App. 7 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 13, 1992
Gwynn v. SAIF, 304 Or 345, 351 , 745 P2d 775 (1987). The parties agree that claimant is disabled and that he is not expected ever to recover fully from being disabled. … However, neither the referee nor the Board decided whether claimant’s disability is temporary in character.
Cited 1 timesPublishedSnyder v. INTERSTATE DISTRIBUTOR CO.
246 Or. App. 130 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 19, 2011
SAIF, 280 Or 723 , 573 P2d 275 (1977), and the burden of establishing good cause falls on the claimant, Cogswell v. SAIF, 74 Or App 234, 237 , 702 P2d 81 (1985). … “Good cause” as used in ORS 656.319 is considered to be a delegative term, and this court reviews the board’s good cause determination for an abuse of discretion. Ogden Aviation v.
Cited 0 timesPublished17 Or. App. 296 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 29, 1974
State v. … Brown, 262 Or 442 , 497 P2d 1191 (1972), holds that under Art I, § 12, Oregon Constitution: ① “* * * a second prosecution is for the ‘same offense’ and is prohibited if (1) the charges arise out of the same act or transaction
Cited 2 timesPublished269 Or. App. 885 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 18, 2015
State v. Clemente-Perez, 261 Or App 146, 148 , 322 P3d 1082 , rev allowed, 356 Or 397 (2014) (citing State v. Cunningham, 320 Or 47, 63 , 880 P2d 431 (1994), cert den, 514 US 1005 (1995)). … In State v.
Cited 1 timesPublished144 Or. App. 247 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 30, 1996
Rollins v. Board of Governors for Higher Educ., 761 F Supp 933, 937 (D RI 1991). … Brown v. J. C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695,705 , 688 P2d 811 (1984). The question is close with respect to both rulings. We have examined the transcript thoroughly.
Cited 0 timesPublished113 Or. App. 118 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 13, 1992
State v. Racicot, 106 Or App 557 , 809 P2d 726 (1991). … Or Laws 1989, ch 790, § 77; see also State v. Serhieriko, 111 Or App 604 , 826 P2d 114 (1992).
Cited 9 timesPublished11 Or. App. 602 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 22, 1972
It was wrapped in a heavy orangish-brown wrapping paper similar to common brown wrapping paper. The wrapping paper was sealed with red and green Christmas-style wrapping tape. … In People v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedNewman v. Murphy Pacific Corp.
20 Or. App. 17 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 14, 1975
The Workmen’s Compensation Board and the hearing officer had previously made similar orders. … See Francoeur v. SAIF, 17 Or App 37 , 520 P2d *22 477 , Sup Ct review denied (1974), where we left undisturbed the assessment by a hearing officer of penalties and attorney fees, but refused further penalties and fees.
Cited 2 timesPublished104 Or. App. 296 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 7, 1990
Payless Drug Stores v. Brown, 300 Or 243 , 708 P2d 1143 (1985); Stromme v. Nasburg and Co., 80 Or App 26 , 721 P2d 847 , rev den 302 Or 35 (1986). … See Payless Drug Stores v. Brown, supra; Stromme v. Nasburg and Co., supra.
Cited 3 timesPublishedOregon Shores Conservation v. Bd. of County
249 Or. App. 531 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 2, 2012
Board of County Commissioners, 243 Or App 298 , 258 P3d 1269 (2011) (Oregon Shores I), and remanded for reconsideration in light of Friends of Yamhill County v. … Board of Commissioners, 351 Or 219 , 264 P3d 1265 (2011) (Friends II)Oregon Shores v. Board of County Commissioners, 351 Or 541 , 273 P3d 135 (2012).
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna