Case law

Knoetzel v. State Accident Insurance Fund

37 Or. App. 627 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 18, 1978

We agree with the Board and the referee that the record does not support claimant’s contention that the disability arose out of his employment. See Friesen v. … See Jones v. Emanuel Hospital, 280 Or 147 , 570 P2d 70 (1977); Williams v. SAIF, 31 Or App 1301 , 572 P2d 658 (1977); ORS 656.262(8).

Stiennon v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

68 Or. App. 735 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 27, 1984

The Board reversed, holding that claimant was not entitled to any time loss “because of prior retirement.” … Taylor v. SAIF, 40 Or App 437, 440 , 595 P2d 515 , rev den 287 Or 477 (1979); see also Hedlund v. SAIF, 55 Or App 313, 317 , 637 P2d 1329 (1981).

Giltner v. SAIF

Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 26, 2023

Claimant now seeks our review of the board’s order. “We review the board’s statutory interpretation for errors of law.” Baker v. Liberty Northwest Ins. … In Landriscina v.

Schutz v. SAIF Corp.

253 Or. App. 541 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 15, 2012

Claimant now seeks judicial review of the board’s order. The Supreme Court explained the two prongs of the work-connection test for compensability in Fred Meyer, Inc. v. … Based on that understanding, claimant contends that the board erroneously injected the issue of negligence into the case. See Columbia River Dairy v.

Peterson v. Eugene F. Burrill Lumber

57 Or. App. 476 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 26, 1982

The Board reversed the referee’s order, because it doubted claimant’s credibility. … The Board’s order is reversed, and the order of the referee is reinstated.

Olds v. Superior Fast Freight

36 Or. App. 673 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 30, 1978

Accordingly, the referee, and consequently the Board, erred in failing to allocate a separate award for loss of function to the scheduled members. Foster v. S.A.I.F., 259 Or 86 , 485 P2d 407 (1971); Rundell v. … The claimant in Surratt v.

Looper v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

56 Or. App. 437 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 22, 1982

Claimant appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) reversing the referee’s award of permanent total disability and awarding claimant 75 percent scheduled disability for his left leg, 40 percent scheduled … Wilson v. Weyerhaeuser, 30 Or App 403, 412-13 , 567 P2d 567 (1977). Under the *441 circumstances, it would have been futile for claimant to have attempted to find employment. Morris v.

State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Gatti

72 Or. App. 106 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 6, 1985

See Wisherd v. … See SAIF v. Maddox, 295 Or 448, 454 , 667 P2d 529 (1983).

Johnson v. Eastern Oregon State College

159 Or. App. 663 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 14, 1999

PER CURIAM Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board reversingan administrative law judge’s (AL J) order awarding claimant permanent total disability for her work-related condition. … Claimant’s first contention, that the procedure set forth in ORS 656.283(7) violates her right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, has been addressed and rejected in Koskela v.

Bahr v. Marion County

38 Or. App. 597 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 20, 1979

"R "At all times material to this action, each of the above listed Defendants was a public official acting in the capacity of a member of the Board of Commissioners of Marion County, State of Oregon under authority granted … Bryan v. Cupp, 1 Or App 52 , 458 P2d 697 (1969). We hold that the trial court erred in striking plaintiffs second amended complaint.

State v. Kelsey

67 Or. App. 554 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 11, 1984

See State v. … By attempting to board the airplane, defendant manifested his implied consent to Smith’s opening the boxes. United States v.

Columbia Riverkeeper v. Columbia Cnty.

297 Or. App. 628 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 22, 2019

ORS 197.850(9)(a) ; Central Oregon Landwatch v. Deschutes County , 285 Or. App. 267 , 269, 396 P.3d 968 (2017). … See Waste Not of Yamhill County v. Yamhill County , 240 Or.

Aylett v. Aylett

185 Or. App. 563 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 8, 2003

In Brown v. Lord, 7 Or 302 (1879), the court reached the same conclusion. In that case, a son sought to enforce an oral agreement by his father to convey land to him. … Brown v. Lord, 7 Or 302, 309 (1879). Plaintiffs assert that our standard of review is for errors of law.

Burge v. SAIF Corp.

108 Or. App. 145 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 3, 1991

Even if decedent was a traveling employee, see SAIF v. … See SAIF v. Barajas, 107 Or App 73 , 810 P2d 1316 (1991). As in SAIF v.

State v. Self

75 Or. App. 230 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 18, 1985

Then, as a further reward, Webb and Brown would go to San Francisco, where Brown would obtain and give Webb five kilos of cocaine. After several calls, Webb contacted the Eugene Police Department. … State ex rel Jones v.

Oregon State Employes Ass'n v. Deschutes County

40 Or. App. 371 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 21, 1979

Klamath Co. v. Laborers Inter. Union, supra at 288-89. … ” Klamath Co. v. Laborers Inter. Union, supra at 287, quoting Winters et al v. Grimes et al, 124 Or 214, 216-17 , 264 P 359 (1928).

Strand Century, Inc. v. Dallas

68 Or. App. 705 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 27, 1984

Greyhound Park v. Ore. Racing Com., 215 Or 76 , 332 P2d 634 (1958). … See Perry v. Oregon Liquor Commission, 180 Or 495 , 177 P2d 406 (1947); Whipple v. OSAA, 52 Or App 419 , 629 P2d 384 , rev den 291 Or 504 (1981).

James v. Kemper Insurance

81 Or. App. 80 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 3, 1986

West v. SAIF, 74 Or App 317, 321 , 702 P2d 1148 (1985). Claimant argues that the referee and the Board could not consider frequency in determining what is *84 reasonable and necessary. … Wetzel v. Goodwin Brothers, 50 Or App 101, 108 , 622 P2d 750 (1981). In determining what is reasonable and necessary, the insurer, the referee and the Board may consider the frequency of the treatments.

Balfour v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

59 Or. App. 503 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 29, 1982

This case was earlier remanded to the Board by this court, 51 Or App 2 , 624 P2d 643 (1981), for reconsideration in light of James v. SAIF, 290 Or 343 , 624 P2d 565 (1981). … McGarrah v. SAIF, 59 Or App 448 , 651 P2d 153 (1982).

Beck v. Mills

36 Or. App. 581 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 16, 1978

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board which reinstated claimant to a vocational rehabilitation program from which the Board found he had been arbitrarily terminated by the Disability Prevention … Hammond v. Albina Engine & Mach., 13 Or App 156 , 509 P2d 56 (1973); Hiles v. Compensation Department, 2 Or App 506 , 470 P2d 165 (1970); Barr v. Compensation Department, 1 Or App 432 , 463 P2d 871 (1970).