Case law

State v. Norton

57 Or. App. 679 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 9, 1982

See Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., 280 Or 95 , 570 P2d 52 (1977). … See Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., supra, 280 Or at 105 .

Wait v. Montgomery Ward, Inc.

10 Or. App. 333 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 27, 1972

The Hearing Officer, the Workmen’s Compensation Board and the court below all held for employer. Claimant received compensation in 1967 for an industrial back injury. … See, Grossen v. Griffey & Laird Logging, 7 Or App 600, 492 P2d 820 (1972), and ORS 656.301 (2). The request was correctly denied. The judgment is affirmed as modified.

State v. Amini

175 Or. App. 370 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 18, 2001

In Medina v. … In Leland v.

Peterson v. Eugene F. Burrill Lumber

57 Or. App. 476 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 26, 1982

The Board reversed the referee’s order, because it doubted claimant’s credibility. … The Board’s order is reversed, and the order of the referee is reinstated.

Giltner v. SAIF

Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 26, 2023

Claimant now seeks our review of the board’s order. “We review the board’s statutory interpretation for errors of law.” Baker v. Liberty Northwest Ins. … In Landriscina v.

Carlson v. Georgia Pacific Corp.

30 Or. App. 625 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 17, 1977

In this worker’s compensation case the Evaluation Division of the Workers’ Compensation Board, referee and Board on review all awarded claimant 40.5 degrees for 30 percent loss of use of his right foot. … As we noted in Hannan v. Good Samaritan Hosp., 4 Or App 178 ,193, 471 P2d 831 , 476 P2d 931 (1970), Sup Ct review denied (1971), and Romero v.

State v. Yamhill Cnty.

298 Or. App. 260 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 19, 2019

First, in Oregon Shores v. Board of County Commissioners , 297 Or. … Second, in Friends of Yamhill County v. Board of Commissioners , 298 Or.

Turo v. SAIF Corp.

131 Or. App. 572 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 14, 1994

Estate of Troy Vance v. Williams, 84 Or App 616 , 734 P2d 1372 (1987). … We agree with the Board that the payments are “compensation.” We disagree, however, with the Board’s conclusion that the entire $15,000 of CDA payment is reimbursable to SAIF.

Lake County v. State

142 Or. App. 162 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 10, 1996

The next day, the State Land Board (Board) decided to “override” plaintiffs disapproval of the sale. … FOPPO v. County of Marion, 93 Or App 93, 97 , 760 P2d 1353 (1988), rev den 307 Or 326 (1989); Mongelli v. Oregon Life and Health Guaranty, 85 Or App 518, 522 , 737 P2d 633 (1987). We said in Bay River v. Envir.

Curry Educational Service District v. Bengtson

175 Or. App. 252 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 5, 2001

See Greenbriar Ag Management v. … See also Freightliner Corp. v.

Shelby v. Palmateer

178 Or. App. 110 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 14, 2001

By its terms, the inquiry that the statute directs the Board to make focuses on the prisoner’s mental state at the time of the diagnosis. Hamel v. … Sheriff's Assn. v. Deschutes Cty., 169 Or App 445, 453 , 9 P3d 742 (2000), rev den 332 Or 137 (2001). In this case, petitioner had a scheduled parole release date.

Griffin v. SAIF Corp.

210 Or. App. 469 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 24, 2007

American Medical Response v. Gavlik, 189 Or App 294, 298-99 , 76 P3d 117 (2003), rev den, 336 Or 376 (2004). … Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Hayes, 325 Or 592, 596 , 943 P2d 197 (1997). The requirement that the injury occur “in the course of’ the employment relates to the time, place, and circumstances of the injury. Krushwitz v.

Mason v. Mountain River Estates, Inc.

73 Or. App. 334 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 17, 1985

Mason v. Linn County, 9 Or LUBA 46 (1983). … See, e.g., Polk County v. Martin, supra, n 1.

Bradshaw v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

69 Or. App. 587 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 5, 1984

Bradshaw v. SAIF, 66 Or App 751 , 675 P2d 519 (1984). … This case is distinquished from Edwards v.

Johnson v. Jefferson County

221 Or. App. 190 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 9, 2008

PER CURIAM Petitioners (Central Oregon LandWatch and Tomas Finnegan Ryan) seek review of a decision of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) that affirmed in part a decision of the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners to … The assignments of error raised by Central Oregon LandWatch are, for the most part, controlled by our decision in Johnson v. Jefferson County (A138263), 221 Or App 156 , 189 P3d 30 (2008).

Madewell v. Salvation Army

49 Or. App. 713 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 8, 1980

The Board reversed. Claimant appeals and the employer cross-appeals on the failure of claimant to prove a compensable claim. We reverse the Board and reinstate the order of the referee. … The decision of the Board is reversed and the referee’s opinion reinstated. Reversed.

SAIF Corp. v. Hukari

113 Or. App. 475 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 24, 1992

The Board affirmed as to compensability but disagreed with the referee’s analysis. … In Boeing Co. v.

United Airlines v. Clark

240 Or. App. 13 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2010

UNITED AIRLINES, Petitioner, v. Bradley S. CLARK, Respondent. 0700246; A139521. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Argued and Submitted July 30, 2010. Decided December 29, 2010. Jerald P. … We conclude that the record as a whole contains substantial evidence to support the board's findings. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill, 90 Or.App. 200, 206 , 752 P.2d 312 (1988). Affirmed.

State v. Caravity

105 Or. App. 410 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 23, 1991

See State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). Defendant was entitled to have his guilt proven beyond a reasonable doubt. State v.

Eugene Education Ass'n v. Eugene School District 4J

58 Or. App. 140 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 8, 1982

In support of his ruling, the arbitrator relied on this Board’s holding in Eugene Education Association v. Eugene School District No. 4J, Case No. … In Brewer v.