Case law

Davis v. R & R Truck Brokers

112 Or. App. 485 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 22, 1992

As we said in Richmond v. … See Johnson v. Spectra Physics, 303 Or 49, 55 , 733 P2d 1367 (1987).

Barrett v. Williams

247 Or. App. 309 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 21, 2011

ORS 34.362(2); Penrod/Brown v. Cupp, 283 Or 21, 28 , 581 P2d 934 (1978). The petition should be construed liberally and not dismissed for merely technical defects. Bedell v. … ORS 34.362(2); Penrod/Brown, 283 Or at 28 .

Surratt v. Gunderson Bros. Engineering Corp.

3 Or. App. 228 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 9, 1970

On ap *230 peal the Workmen’s Compensation Board affirmed the award made by the hearing officer. … In the language of Romero v.

JH KELLY, LLC v. Smith

244 Or. App. 123 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 29, 2011

Bracke v. … See SAIF v.

Melius v. Boise Cascade Corp.

2 Or. App. 206 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 12, 1970

The hearing officer rejected the low back claim and on review the Workmen’s Compensation Board sustained his finding. Claimant then appealed to the circuit court and the claim was allowed. … Furthermore, we believe the facts require application of the rule' of Romero v. Compensation Department, 250 Or 368 , 440 P2d 866 (1968), as interpreted in Ryf v.

State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Harris

66 Or. App. 165 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 14, 1983

Wilson v. SAIF, 48 Or App 993 , 618 P2d 473 (1980); Hicks v. Fred Meyer, Inc., 57 Or App 68 , 643 P2d 1311 , modified 58 Or App 18 , 643 P2d 1311 (1982). … The jurisdiction of the Hearings Division and the Board are established by the Workers’ Compensation Act.

State v. Taylor

133 Or. App. 503 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 24, 1995

State v. Morrison, 33 Or App 9 , 575 P2d 988 (1978); State v. Bray, 31 Or App 47 , 569 P2d 688 (1977). Defendant argues that those cases are no longer good authority in the light of State v. … See, e.g., State v. Armstrong, 71 Or App 467 , 692 P2d 699 (1984); State v. Haynes, 49 Or App 89 , 619 P2d 889 (1980); State v. Peters, 39 Or App 109 , 591 P2d 761 (1979); State v.

Conner v. Connecticut Indemnity Co.

139 Or. App. 421 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 6, 1996

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board upholding insurer’s denial of his degenerative disc disease. We remand the case for reconsideration in the light of recent statutory changes. … Volk v. America West Airlines, 135 Or App 565 , 899 P2d 746 (1995).

Errand v. Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.

126 Or. App. 450 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 23, 1994

Plaintiff did not seek judicial review of the Board’s order. … As the Supreme Court said in Reynolds et al v.

Bethel School District No. 52 v. Humphreys

67 Or. App. 733 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 18, 1984

Subsequently, Kness accepted the board’s offer to teach P.E. On August 11, the board dismissed Humphreys. … Rotten Roberts v. OLCC, 65 Or App 351, 355 , 671 P2d 753 (1983), rev den 296 Or 486 (1984); Oregon Shores v.

Preble v. Centennial School Dist., No. 287

325 Or. App. 777 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 10, 2023

The Workers’ Compensation Board (board) ultimately found that plaintiff’s evidence was not as persuasive as defendant’s. … Because the board found plaintiff’s evidence less persuasive, she ultimately failed to establish her theory of causation. 786 Preble v.

Moser v. Hampton

67 Or. App. 716 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 18, 1984

See, e.g., Brown v. Brown, 88 Conn. 42 , 89 A. 889 (1914); Crowell v. Crowell, 180 N.C. 516 , 105 S.E. 206 (1920). [4] Many writers have criticized the rule. … Brown, 88 Conn. 42 , 89 A. 889 (1914); Indiana: Brooks v. Robinson, 259 Ind. 16 , 284 N.E.2d 794 (1972); Kentucky: Brown v. Gosser, 262 S.W.2d 480 (Kentucky 1953); Maine: MacDonald v.

Welliver Welding Works v. Farmen

133 Or. App. 203 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 22, 1995

The Board affirmed on the same basis. On review, employer contends that the Board erred in concluding that OAR 436-120-005(6)(b) is invalid. … The issue in this case is whether the Board correctly determined that the director’s rule defining “regular employment” is invalid. In Springfield Education Assn. v.

Tifft v. Stevens

162 Or. App. 62 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 28, 1999

Daly v. Fitch, 70 Or App 18 , 21 n 2, 687 P2d 1124 (1984). … In Smith v.

Stewart v. City of Eugene

57 Or. App. 627 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 9, 1982

Respondent points to Board of Medical Examiners v. … See Petersen v.

SAIF Corp. v. Terrien

221 Or. App. 671 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 13, 2008

Reynolds v. Hydro Tech, 182 Or App 488, 490-91 , 49 P3d 827 (2002). … See Express Services, Inc. v.

State Ex Rel. Haas v. Club Recreation & Pleasure

41 Or. App. 557 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 20, 1979

ORS 465.150. 2 *561 I Citing Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. … Webster v. Daugherty, supra; Hensley v.

Klamath County School District v. Teamey

207 Or. App. 250 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 2, 2006

State ex rel OHSU v. … Be that as it may, see State v.

Wright v. Industrial Indemnity Co.

68 Or. App. 302 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 9, 1984

The Board relied on Hollingsworth v. May Trucking, 59 Or App 531 , 651 P2d 188 , rev den 294 Or 212 (1982). We reverse and remand. Claimant, a long-haul truck driver, is employed by May Trucking Company (May). … See Epton v. Moskee Investment Co., 180 Or 86, 93 , 174 P2d 418 (1946). The Board did not address that finding. It appears that the Board concluded that May is the employer, and May has not contested that conclusion.

Adams v. State Accident Insurance Fund

43 Or. App. 899 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 31, 1979

Thus this case is to be distinguished from such cases as Leaton v. SAIF, 27 Or App 669 , 556 P2d 1375 (1976), rev den, 277 Or 491 (1977); Brady v. Gen. Acc. Assur. … Co., 29 Or App 357 , 563 P2d 763 (1977), and Saunders v. SAIF, 40 Or App 169 , 596 P2d 1316 (1979).