Case law

Babb v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

49 Or. App. 707 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 8, 1980

The Supreme Court has answered that question in the negative in Frasure v. Agripac, 41 Or 7 , 596 P2d 1015 (1980). … See Funke v. SAIF, 49 Or App 279 , 619 P2d 668 (1980).

In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Clark

24 Or. App. 297 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 3, 1976

Rowley v. Row ley, 232 Or 285 , 375 P2d 84 (1962); Brown v. Brown, 1 Or App 543, 464 P2d 706 (1970). Affirmed. No costs to either party.

Knupp v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

79 Or. App. 273 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 14, 1986

The scope of review of an order was considered by this court in Mansfield v. Caplener Bros., 3 Or App 448 , 474 P2d 785 (1970). … This case does not have any bearing on our consideration of evidence improperly excluded by the referee or Board. Relying on Stone v.

Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Angus

200 Or. App. 94 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 1, 2005

ORS 656.265(4)(a); Keller v. SAIF, 175 Or App 78, 82 , 27 P3d 1064 (2001), rev den, 333 Or 260 (2002). … Co. v.

Thomas v. Cascade Union High School District No. 5

80 Or. App. 736 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 20, 1986

Ross v. Springfield School Dist. No. 19 (Ross I), 294 Or 357 , 657 P2d 188 (1982). … Ross v. Springfield School Dist. No. 19 (Ross II), 300 Or 507, 518 , 716 P2d 724 (1986).

Widener v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.

40 Or. App. 3 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 7, 1979

On review, the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) affirmed in all respects. … The referee, the Board and the circuit court all agreed that he did prove a compensable injury.

Eatherly v. Oregon State Correctional Institution

24 Or. App. 41 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 12, 1976

Civil Service Board v. Warren, 74 Ariz. 88, 90, 91, 92 , 244 P.2d 1157 . * * *” In Deyesu v. … Frishein v. Reavy, [ 263 App. Div. 490 ,] 33 N.Y.S.2d 894 , aff’d by the Court of Appeals of New York in [ 289 N.Y. 712 ,] 45 N.E.2d 921 ; Gollin v. Watson, [ 200 Misc. 96 ,] 102 N.Y.S.2d 935 ; Sloat v.

SAIF Corp. v. Bales

107 Or. App. 198 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 15, 1991

Springfield Education Assn. v. School Dist., 290 Or 217 , 621 P2d 547 (1980). … See, e.g., Johnson v. City of Roseburg, 86 Or App 344 , 739 P2d 602 (1982).

Dymock v. Norwest Safety Protective Equipment for Oregon Industry, Inc.

172 Or. App. 399 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 14, 2001

Sears, Roebuck and Co., 298 Or 76, 90-97 , 689 P2d 1292 (1984), or filing a claim for workers’ compensation benefits, Brown v. Transcon Lines, 284 Or 597 , 588 P2d 1087 (1978).” … See, e.g., Holien, 298 Or at 90-97 ; Brown, 284 Or at 604 .

Northrup King & Co. v. Fisher

91 Or. App. 602 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 22, 1988

Northrup King & Company (employer) seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order holding that claimant was entitled to temporary total disability (TTD) benefits for the period during which he was incarcerated in prison … ORS 656.283(1); Austin v. Consolidated Freightways, 74 Or App 680 , 704 P2d 525 , rev den 300 Or 332 (1985); Jackson v. SAIF, 7 Or App 109 , 490 P2d 507 (1971). Cutright v.

State v. Morgan

330 Or. App. 156 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 10, 2024

Cite as 330 Or App 156 (2024) 157 158 State v. Morgan JOYCE, J. … State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 445, 687 P2d 751 (1984) (holding that polygraph evidence is inadmissible in any legal proceeding subject to the Oregon Evidence Code); see also State v.

Davis v. R & R Truck Brokers

112 Or. App. 485 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 22, 1992

As we said in Richmond v. … See Johnson v. Spectra Physics, 303 Or 49, 55 , 733 P2d 1367 (1987).

Beason v. Harcleroad

105 Or. App. 376 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 23, 1991

Scott & Payne v. Potomac Ins. Co., 217 Or 323, 330 , 341 P2d 1083 (1959). We *380 must accept the allegations in the pleadings as true. Salem Sand v. City of Salem, 260 Or 630, 636 , 492 P2d 271 (1971); Brown v. … Or Laws 1989, ch 3, § 1; see Merrick v. Board of Higher Education, 103 Or App 328 , 797 P2d 388 (1990). We overruled LaMarche on other grounds in a case that the Supreme Court ultimately reversed. Hunter v.

Pebb v. Ohsu

205 Or. App. 64 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 5, 2006

App. 64 STATE of Oregon, by and through the PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' BENEFIT BOARD, Plaintiff, v. … In Miller v. C.C.

Surratt v. Gunderson Bros. Engineering Corp.

3 Or. App. 228 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 9, 1970

On ap *230 peal the Workmen’s Compensation Board affirmed the award made by the hearing officer. … In the language of Romero v.

JH KELLY, LLC v. Smith

244 Or. App. 123 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 29, 2011

Bracke v. … See SAIF v.

State v. Corbett

15 Or. App. 470 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 3, 1973

Wong Sun v. United States, 371 US 471 , 83 S Ct 407 , 9 L Ed 2d 441 (1963); State v. Hogg, 7 Or App 99 , 490 P2d 198 (1971). … State v. Stanton, 7 Or App 286 , 490 P2d 1274 (1971); State v. Brown, 1 Or App 322 , 461 P2d 836 (1969), Sup Ct review denied (1970).

State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Harris

66 Or. App. 165 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 14, 1983

Wilson v. SAIF, 48 Or App 993 , 618 P2d 473 (1980); Hicks v. Fred Meyer, Inc., 57 Or App 68 , 643 P2d 1311 , modified 58 Or App 18 , 643 P2d 1311 (1982). … The jurisdiction of the Hearings Division and the Board are established by the Workers’ Compensation Act.

Conner v. Connecticut Indemnity Co.

139 Or. App. 421 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 6, 1996

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board upholding insurer’s denial of his degenerative disc disease. We remand the case for reconsideration in the light of recent statutory changes. … Volk v. America West Airlines, 135 Or App 565 , 899 P2d 746 (1995).

Stovall v. Sally Salmon Seafood

84 Or. App. 612 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 8, 1987

The Board properly assigned responsibility to Hallmark for the cumulative effect of the exposures at the two employments. *615 Bracke v. Baza’r, 293 Or 239 , 646 P2d 1330 (1982). … She prevailed finally before the Board on her claim against Hallmark and, for that reason, is entitled to attorney fees under ORS 656.386(1), payable by Hallmark. Petshow v. Farm Bureau Ins.