Case law

Driver v. Rod & Reel Restaurant

125 Or. App. 661 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 5, 1994

Cook v. Workers’ Compensation Department, 306 Or 134, 138 , 758 P2d 854 (1988). The question is whether physical therapy is one of the “healing arts.” … The Board can address that ambiguity on remand. 4 Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

Thomas v. Cascade Union High School District No. 5

80 Or. App. 736 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 20, 1986

Ross v. Springfield School Dist. No. 19 (Ross I), 294 Or 357 , 657 P2d 188 (1982). … Ross v. Springfield School Dist. No. 19 (Ross II), 300 Or 507, 518 , 716 P2d 724 (1986).

RLC Industries v. Sun Studs, Inc.

172 Or. App. 233 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 31, 2001

James River Corp. v. … The Board in Farmers Ins.

Barrett Business Services v. Hames

130 Or. App. 190 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 7, 1994

Invoking Hicks v. Spectra Physics, 117 Or App 293 , 843 P2d 1009 (1992), and Kephart v. … See Wood v.

SAIF Corp. v. Bales

107 Or. App. 198 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 15, 1991

Springfield Education Assn. v. School Dist., 290 Or 217 , 621 P2d 547 (1980). … See, e.g., Johnson v. City of Roseburg, 86 Or App 344 , 739 P2d 602 (1982).

Haynes v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

75 Or. App. 262 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 18, 1985

The Board affirmed the referee’s determination that jurisdiction over such disputes is vested in the Director of the Workers’ Compensation Department. We agree and affirm. … Claimant cites SAIF v. Belcher, 71 Or App 502 , 692 P2d 711 (1984), as authority for his position that claimant’s interest in the medical fee dispute brings the dispute within the Hearings Division’s jurisdiction.

Pebb v. Ohsu

205 Or. App. 64 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 5, 2006

App. 64 STATE of Oregon, by and through the PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' BENEFIT BOARD, Plaintiff, v. … In Miller v. C.C.

Florence v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

55 Or. App. 467 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 6, 1982

The Workers’ Compensation Board, citing Weller v. … See Eber v. Royal Globe, 54 Or App 940 , 636 P2d 1007 (1981). The order of the Board is reversed and remanded with instructions to reinstate the referee’s opinion.

Stovall v. Sally Salmon Seafood

84 Or. App. 612 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 8, 1987

The Board properly assigned responsibility to Hallmark for the cumulative effect of the exposures at the two employments. *615 Bracke v. Baza’r, 293 Or 239 , 646 P2d 1330 (1982). … She prevailed finally before the Board on her claim against Hallmark and, for that reason, is entitled to attorney fees under ORS 656.386(1), payable by Hallmark. Petshow v. Farm Bureau Ins.

Oregon Ass'n of Classified Employees v. Salem-Keizer School District 24J

95 Or. App. 28 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 25, 1989

Assn. v. … District relies on School District No. 17 v.

Friends of Yamhill County v. Yamhill County

325 Or. App. 282 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 19, 2023

Land Use Board of Appeals 2022081; A180472 529 P3d 1007 Petitioner 1000 Friends of Yamhill County seeks judicial review of an order of the Land Use Board of Appeals … Id. at 459. 292 Friends of Yamhill County v.

Mentor Graphics Corp. v. Velazquez

248 Or. App. 102 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 8, 2012

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Warren, 103 Or App 275, 278 , 796 P2d 1246 (1990), rev den, 311 Or 60 (1991) (citing Weller v. Union Carbide Corp., 288 Or 27, 33 , 602 P2d 259 (1979)). … If the board did draw that inference, it needs to say so, and it needs to explain how Graham’s report supports that inference. See City of Roseburg v.

Whitney v. Employment Division

28 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 10, 1977

On May 19, 1976, ERB adopted the findings of the Board Agent. … Oregon State Grange v. McKay, 193 Or 627 , 238 P2d 778 (1951), 239 P2d 834 (1952). Appeal dismissed.

Compensation of Rivers v. State Accident Insurance Fund

45 Or. App. 1105 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 28, 1980

Davis v. Wasco IED, 286 Or 261, 267 , 593 P2d 1152 (1979). … Salahub v. Montgomery Ward, 41 Or App 775, 785-786 , 599 P2d 1210 (1979), rev den 288 Or 249 , 603 P2d 1381 (1979), quoting from Bock v. Bend School District No. 1, 252 Or 53, 55 , 448 P2d 521 (1968).

McLean v. Buck Medical Services, Inc.

157 Or. App. 563 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 9, 1998

See ORAP 5.45(2); Ailes v. … Baltimore County, 895 F Supp 773 (D Md 1995); Klein v. Rush-Presbyterian-St.

Robbins v. Executive Department

31 Or. App. 769 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 21, 1977

Petitioner appeals from a decision of the Employment Relations Board (Board) upholding his dismissal for insubordination. … Grisby v. Employment Div., 24 Or App 499, 501-02 , 546 P2d 788 (1976).

SAIF Corp. v. ILIAIFAR

217 Or. App. 104 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 19, 2007

We conclude that the board correctly interpreted the rule, and we affirm. The following facts were found by the board and are supported by substantial evidence. ORS 656.298(7); ORS 183.482(8)(c); Worldmark The Club v. … We review the board’s interpretation of the administrative rule for errors of law. SAIF v. Donahue-Birran, 195 Or App 173, 175 , 96 P3d 1282 (2004).

Columbia Plywood Corp. v. Employment Division

36 Or. App. 469 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 2, 1978

Employer appeals from a determination of the Employment Appeals Board (Board) that claimant was not discharged for misconduct connected with his work within the meaning of ORS 657.176(2)(a). … The Board treated the series of incidents as one imprudent act involving an exercise of poor judgment or inadvertence. Relying on Geraths v.

SAIF Corp. v. Abbott

103 Or. App. 49 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 8, 1990

The Board affirmed. Petitioners argue that the Board erred in setting aside SAIF’s denial. … In Georgia-Pacific v.

Priest v. City of Hermiston

106 Or. App. 732 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 24, 1991

The referee held that the claim was compensable and, relying on Runft v. … Runft v. SAIF, supra. We conclude that it did.