Case law

Turudic v. Stephens

176 Or. App. 175 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 22, 2001

See Aldridge v. … See Original CCRs, Art V, sec 2 (Board shall regulate use of land “in such a manner as to preserve and enhance lot values and farming and to maintain a harmonious relationship among structures and the natural vegetation and

Mantle v. SAIF

Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 4, 2024

“Generally speaking, under ORS 656.704, the board has review author- ity over matters concerning a claim, and the director has review authority over matters other than those concerning a claim.” Martin v. … See id. at 186 n 3 (noting that either the MRU, the board, or both may have authority to resolve the dispute); cf. Daugherty v.

Cascade Steel Rolling Mills v. Madril

57 Or. App. 398 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 12, 1982

In Hannan v. … In Green v. State Ind. Acc.

Marshall v. SAIF Corp.

146 Or. App. 50 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 29, 1997

The Board affirmed the AU. In SAIF v. … As required by PGE v.

Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Little

107 Or. App. 316 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 22, 1991

Eastman v. Georgia Pacific Corp., 79 Or App 610 , 719 P2d 1310 (1986). … Employer also asserts that, because claimant did not personally appear at the hearing, the Board erred when it refused to dismiss the request for hearing. Employer is wrong. See Williams v.

Persad v. Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Inc.

106 Or. App. 615 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 17, 1991

He did and spoke with another nurse, Brown. … Plaintiff relies on Reynoldson v. Jackson, 275 Or 641 , 552 P2d 236 (1976), and State v. Apperson, 85 Or App 429 , 736 P2d 1026 (1987).

Putman v. Employment Division

36 Or. App. 267 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 18, 1978

Petitioner appeals from a determination of the Employment Appeals Board (Board) denying him unemployment compensation on the grounds that he "voluntarily left work without good cause,” ORS 657.176(2)(c). … Morgan, 17 Or App 428 , 522 P2d 1204 (1974), and Garrelts v. Employment Division, 21 Or App 437 , 535 P2d 115 (1975), he was acting as a reasonably prudent person when he quit.

State v. Baucum

268 Or. App. 649 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 22, 2015

Montgomery v. Miller, 234 Ariz 289, 304-05, 321 P3d 454, 469-70 (Ariz Ct App 2014); State v. Burgess, 188 Vt 235, 241-44, 5 A3d 911, 915-17 (2010); Smith v. State, 942 So2d 308, 317-18 (Miss App 2006); State v. … In State v.

Sinsel v. Henderson

62 Or. App. 150 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 2, 1983

At trial, the parties stipulated to the amount, value and logging costs of the timber taken by defendants: (a) Fir - 3,100 board feet net at $190 per 1,000 board feet, $589. … (b) Spruce - 3,550 board feet net at $85 per 1,000 board feet, $301.75. (c) Hemlock - 2,510 board feet net at $85 per 1,000 board feet, $213.35.

RLC Industries v. Sun Studs, Inc.

172 Or. App. 233 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 31, 2001

James River Corp. v. … The Board in Farmers Ins.

Driver v. Rod & Reel Restaurant

125 Or. App. 661 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 5, 1994

Cook v. Workers’ Compensation Department, 306 Or 134, 138 , 758 P2d 854 (1988). The question is whether physical therapy is one of the “healing arts.” … The Board can address that ambiguity on remand. 4 Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.

State v. Serhienko

111 Or. App. 604 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 26, 1992

ORS 144.110 provides for a minimum term of up to one half the length of the sentence, and it may be overridden only by a vote of four of the State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision members. … State v. Turner, 247 Or 301 , 429 P2d 565 (1967). Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

The New Portland Meadows v. Dieringer

157 Or. App. 619 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 16, 1998

The New Portland Meadows (TNPM) moves for reconsideration of our opinion in The New Portland Meadows v. … Reynolds Metals v. Rogers, 157 Or App 147, 153 , 967 P2d 1251 (1998).

Taylor v. Multnomah County School District No. 1

109 Or. App. 499 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 13, 1991

ORS 656.005(7)(a); see *502 Mashadda v. Western Employers Insurance, 75 Or App 93, 95 , 705 P2d 234 (1985). In Wausau Insurance Company v. … The Board did not, and we do not, address the bleacher incident.

McAdams v. Saif Corp.

66 Or. App. 415 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 11, 1984

Livesley Co. v. … The Board reversed. In Phil A. Livesley Co. v. Russ, supra, the claimant was walking down a crowded aisle from his work station to the *418 time-clock to punch out when he fell and broke his hip.

Madrigal v. J. Frank Schmidt & Son

172 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 17, 2001

We review the Board’s construction of the applicable statute as a matter of law, looking first to the text of the statute in context and then, if necessary, to legislative history and other aids to construction. PGE v. … Cutright v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 299 Or 290, 296 , 702 P2d 403 (1985). As this court held in Roseburg Forest Products v.

Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Angus

200 Or. App. 94 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 1, 2005

ORS 656.265(4)(a); Keller v. SAIF, 175 Or App 78, 82 , 27 P3d 1064 (2001), rev den, 333 Or 260 (2002). … Co. v.

Sykes v. Weyerhaeuser Company

90 Or. App. 41 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 9, 1988

Cutright v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 299 Or 290 , 702 P2d 403 (1985). The issue here is factual. The Board cited our decision in Karr v. … The employer requested reconsideration, asserting that under Cutright v.

Klamath County School District v. Teamey

207 Or. App. 250 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 2, 2006

State ex rel OHSU v. … Be that as it may, see State v.

State v. T. A. C.

327 Or. App. 189 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 19, 2023

State v. E. J. … Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., 280 Or 95, 103, 570 P2d 52 (1977).