Case law

State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Norbeck

70 Or. App. 270 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 10, 1984

SAIF appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board. … See Bono v. SAIF, 66 Or App 138 , 673 P2d 558 (1983), rev allowed 296 Or 829 , 679 P2d 1366 (1984); Stone v.

Olney School District 11 v. Olney Education Ass'n

145 Or. App. 578 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 22, 1997

The District’s school board meets on a monthly or semi-monthly basis. … Springfield Education Assn. v. School Dist., 290 Or 217, 230 , 621 P2d 547 (1980). We review to determine *583 whether ERB’s interpretation is within the range of discretion allowed by the general policy of the statute.

Cochell v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

59 Or. App. 391 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 15, 1982

We are not privy to the Board’s “intuition and insight” and find no basis for disbelieving the witness to the fall. … In Cooper v.

State Ex Rel. City of Powers v. Coos County Airport District

201 Or. App. 222 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 17, 2005

See Emerald PUD v. … See City of Eugene v.

Hernandez v. SAIF Corp.

178 Or. App. 82 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 14, 2001

Nelson v. EBI Companies, 296 Or 246 , 674 P2d 596 (1984). … The Board, in essence, agreed with employer. We do as well.

Humphrey v. State Accident Insurance Fund

58 Or. App. 360 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 21, 1982

Anfilofieff v. SAIF, 52 Of App 127, 131, 627 P2d 1274 (1981); Crampton v. Bullis, 48 Or App 179, 182 , 616 P2d 562 (1980); Miller v. Granite Construction Co., 28 Or App 473, 477 , 559 P2d 944 (1977). … Hedlund v. SAIF, 55 Or App 313, 637 P2d 1329 (1981); Vader v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 163 Or 492 , 98 P2d 714 (1940).

State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Gupton

63 Or. App. 270 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 25, 1983

In Bracke v. … Although we agree that the Board misapplied the rule in Bracke, SAIF v. Luhrs, 63 Or App 78 , 663 P2d 418 (1983), that makes no difference to the result in this case.

Connall v. Felton

225 Or. App. 266 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 14, 2009

Brown v. Brown, 206 Or App 239, 249 , 139 P3d 745 , rev den, 341 Or 449 (2006). … See Belton v.

State v. Stephens

223 Or. App. 644 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 12, 2008

State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). … See State v.

Evers v. State of Oregon

69 Or. App. 450 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 8, 1984

In Brown v. Multnomah County, 280 Or 95 , 570 P2d 52 (1977), the Supreme Court addressed whether a DUII infraction may be tried without the constitutional safeguards guaranteed defendants in criminal prosecutions. … Under Brown v. Multnomah County, supra, petitioner had a right to an attorney, and he is entitled to a forum in which to litigate the denial of that right. In State v.

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Warrilow

96 Or. App. 34 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 5, 1989

The Board affirmed the referee, but for a different reason. It set aside the denial on the ground that it did not satisfy the requirements of Johnson v. … That is sufficient to meet the requirement of Johnson v. Spectra Physics, supra.

Matter of Compensation of Condon

52 Or. App. 1043 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 29, 1981

Anfilofieff v. SAIF, 52 Or App 127 , 627 P2d 1274 (1981); Widener v. La-Pac Corp, 40 Or App 3 , 594 P2d 832 , rev den 287 Or 129 (1979). … The order of the Board is reversed. Reversed.

Korbut v. Eastman Kodak Co.

787 P.2d 896 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 7, 1990

787 P.2d 896 (1990) 100 Or.App. 649 Michael KORBUT, Sr., Personal Representative of the Estate of Carolyn Korbut, Deceased, Appellant, v. … Wynn and Haight, Brown and Bonesteel, Santa Monica, California. Before JOSEPH, C.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ. PER CURIAM. This is a wrongful death action based on defective product allegations.

State v. Burch

134 Or. App. 569 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 24, 1995

Rood, 129 Or App 422 , 879 P2d 886 (1994), State v. Jones, 129 Or App 413 , 879 P2d 881 (1994), and State v. … State v. Farmer, 317 Or 220 , 224 n 4, 856 P2d 623 (1993); State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990).

Whitman v. Industrial Indemnity Co.

73 Or. App. 73 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 3, 1985

EBI Companies v. Thomas, 66 Or App 105 (1983). … ORS 656.202(2); SAIF v. Mathews, 55 Or App 608 (1982).

E.C.D., Inc. v. Snider

105 Or. App. 416 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 6, 1991

It held that, because Safeco had not remained in the proceeding, as required by *419 Runft v. … The Board’s reasoning is not persuasive. Safeco had been joined in the proceeding and was dismissed on its motion without objection from claimant. Liberty had satisfied its obligation under Runft v. SAIF, supra.

Freres Lumber Co. v. Murphy

101 Or. App. 92 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 28, 1990

The Board set aside employer’s denial in its entirety. … ORS 656.245(1); Wetzel v. Goodwin Brothers, 50 Or App 101, 108 , 622 P2d 750 (1981). However, in James v. Kemper Ins.

SAIF Corp. v. Crawley

113 Or. App. 152 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 13, 1992

It then asked the Board to reopen the claim to determine whether the compensation that it had voluntarily paid was payable under the Board’s own motion jurisdiction. … International Paper Co. v. Wright, 80 Or App 444, 447 , 722 P2d 57 (1986). Because the Board’s denial of SAIF’s request neither increased nor decreased claimant’s award, we cannot review SAIF’s petition.

Lindamood v. SAIF Corp.

78 Or. App. 15 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 26, 1986

The Board, citing Price v. … . *18 In Mendenhall v.

Stoddard v. Credit-Thrift Corp.

103 Or. App. 283 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 5, 1990

The referee held that remodelling of a home is not the type of service for which compensation is allowed under ORS 656.245(1), relying on Lorenzen v. SAIF, 79 Or App 751 , 719 P2d 1336 (1986). … The Board did not reach the issue of whether the remodelling was a covered service under ORS 656.245(1).