Case law

International Paper Co. v. Huntley

106 Or. App. 107 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 27, 1991

Dawkins v. Pacific Motor Trucking, 308 Or 254 , 778 P2d 497 (1989). … Free v. Wilmar J. Helric Co., 70 Or App 40 , 688 P2d 117 (1984), rev den 298 Or 553 (1985). Affirmed.

Ashby v. Employment Division

21 Or. App. 265 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 5, 1975

The essence of the Appeals Board’s decision is found in its statement of CONCLUSIONS AND REASONS: “* * * The claimant is contending that the Appeals Board must interpret this language as nothing less than a fully binding … Co. v. Hill, 235 Or 352, 356-357 , 381 P2d 219 (1963). We find the word “contract” to be unambiguous. Succinctly, a contract is a binding obligation. 1 *269 Restatement 1, Contracts § 1.

Norby v. SAIF Corp.

82 Or. App. 157 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 12, 1986

Claimant argues that the Board erred in considering the stipulated award. … Claimant contends only that the Board misapplied the statute and not that, if it applied the statute correctly, he is entitled to a greater disability award. But see Pacific Motor Trucking Co. v.

SAIF Corp. v. Sweeney

115 Or. App. 506 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 14, 1992

The Board reversed the referee’s reduction of claimant’s PPD award, as well as the attorney fees related to the increase of the employer closure award from 17 percent PPD to 25 percent, awarded attorney fees for Board review … In Leedy v.

Johnsen v. Beacon Electric/Hamilton Electric

117 Or. App. 285 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 23, 1992

We agree with the Board and affirm. The Board found that claimant has been employed as an electrician by the same employer since the 1950’s, when employer’s name was Hamilton Electric Company. … Johnsen v. Hamilton Electric, 90 Or App 161, 165 , 751 P2d 246 (1988). In this claim against Beacon, filed in 1988, claimant alleges that he was exposed to asbestos on the job in 1984, while the first claim was pending.

Trujillo v. Pacific Safety Supply

181 Or. App. 302 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 8, 2002

See, e.g., Carr v. … See, e.g., Landon v.

SAIF Corp. v. Batey

155 Or. App. 21 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 15, 1998

SAIF petitions for reconsideration of our opinion in SAIF v. … As on appeal, in its petition for reconsideration, SAIF points to ORS 656.277 and Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Johnson, 134 Or App 432 , 895 P2d 811 , rev den 322 Or 167 (1995), to support its argument.

SAIF v. Wild

237 Or. App. 454 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 29, 2010

Because OAR XXX-XXX-XXXX was adopted by the director, the board's interpretation of the rule is not entitled to deference. SAIF v. Donahue-Birran, 195 Or.App. 173, 181 , 96 P.3d 1282 (2004). … See, e.g., Hamilton v. Hughey, 284 Or. 739, 743 , 588 P.2d 38 (1978).

Barnett v. Saif Corp.

122 Or. App. 279 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 4, 1993

The Board affirmed. … Claimant argues that the Board erred in holding that expert testimony was necessary to establish that the March 21 incident at work caused her lumbosacral strain. SAIF contends that Edwards v.

Wolf v. Nordstrom, Inc.

51 Or. App. 715 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 13, 1981

He is a white male, age 13, 5'4" tall, weighing 125 pounds, with brown hair and brown eyes. He was wearing blue jeans, a green jacket and well-worn white tennis shoes. … State ex rel Young v. Crookham, supra at 71; Lukas v. J. C. Penney Co., supra at 357, 359 and 361.

Iwasaki v. Iwasaki Bros., Inc.

58 Or. App. 543 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 18, 1982

Baker v. … Arthur was aware that he had the ability to block the action of the board by voting against it creating a tie, but instead abstained. This situation is similar to that in Baker v. Commercial Body Builders, supra.

Smith v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

78 Or. App. 443 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 9, 1986

The Board reduced the award to 50 percent; we reinstated the referee’s award. Smith v. SAIF, 51 Or App 833 , 627 P2d 495 (1981). Claimant continued to have problems after the hearing. On April 16, 1980, he saw Dr. … The Board decided that none of those reports was sufficient to constitute an aggravation claim. We disagree. In Haret v.

Humphreys v. Bethel School District No. 52

54 Or. App. 867 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 23, 1981

Because it dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, the Board failed to make a finding on this issue. 4 We remand *872 for it to do so. Wright v. Insurance Commissioner, 252 Or 283 , 449 P2d 419 (1969). … The Board found petitioner received no notice of nonrenewal by April 1, 1980, for the 1980-1981 school year.

Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Holden

115 Or. App. 390 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 30, 1992

Substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that the knee injury was work-related. … Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Ferrer, 114 Or App 471 , 835 P2d 949 (1992). Employer’s remaining argument does not require discussion. Affirmed.

Rich v. Employment Division

29 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 4, 1977

Claimants appeal from a decision of the Employment Appeals Board (Board) denying them unemployment compensation on the grounds that their employment was terminated because of a labor dispute. … Wagner v. Employment Div., 28 Or App 857, 860 , 562 P2d 203 (1977). Remanded.

Bank of Newport v. Wages

142 Or. App. 145 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 3, 1996

The Board, although adopting the ALJ’s findings of fact, reversed. … Finally, employer acknowledges that a medical opinion may be sufficient proof of causation even if it does not explicitly *151 employ the “magic words” of “major contributing cause.” 2 See McClendon v.

In Re Ransom

499 P.2d 1374 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 27, 1972

Ann Marie Ransom, Appellant, v. United States National Bank of Oregon, Respondent. Court of Appeals of Oregon, Department 2. Argued and Submitted June 19, 1972. Decided July 27, 1972. *1375 George M. … Claimant relies principally on Stroh v. SAIF, 93 Or.Adv.Sh. 1819, 492 P.2d 472 (1972), as her authority for the proposition that her late service upon the Board may *1376 be excused.

International Paper Company v. Turner

84 Or. App. 248 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 11, 1987

We agree with the Board’s conclusion that claimant has not suffered a new injury so as to support a claim against Bohemia. … See Smith v.

Geo-Culture, Inc. v. Siam Investment Management S.A.

147 Or. App. 536 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 16, 1997

Affirmed. 1 In Sutherland v. … Both the United States and the United Kingdom of Great Britain (which governs Hong Kong) are signatory nations. 4 See, e.g., Textor v. Board of Regents Of N. Ill.

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Hughes

85 Or. App. 362 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 6, 1987

Pending review by the Board, employer refused to pay interim compensation. … The Board reduced the penalty to reflect the reduced amount of interim compensation that was due on application of the Supreme Court’s decision in Bono v.