Case law

Iwasaki v. Iwasaki Bros., Inc.

58 Or. App. 543 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 18, 1982

Baker v. … Arthur was aware that he had the ability to block the action of the board by voting against it creating a tie, but instead abstained. This situation is similar to that in Baker v. Commercial Body Builders, supra.

State, Department of Justice v. Bryant

101 Or. App. 226 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 4, 1990

See Dept. of Justice v. Spear, 308 Or 594 , 783 P2d 998 (1989). The exceptions found in ORS 656.265(4) are inconsistent with ORS 655.520(3). … The order of the Board is therefore reversed. Reversed. The Board also ordered petitioner to pay claimant’s attorney fees from the Inmate Injury Fund for legal services performed before the referee and Board.

Smith v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

78 Or. App. 443 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 9, 1986

The Board reduced the award to 50 percent; we reinstated the referee’s award. Smith v. SAIF, 51 Or App 833 , 627 P2d 495 (1981). Claimant continued to have problems after the hearing. On April 16, 1980, he saw Dr. … The Board decided that none of those reports was sufficient to constitute an aggravation claim. We disagree. In Haret v.

State v. Lloyd

22 Or. App. 254 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 11, 1975

. # # # # *263 Because, as defendant correctly points out, the state is precluded from making use of evidence it has obtained through the exploitation of an illegal arrest or detention — Brown v. … Justice Powell’s concurring opinion in Brown v. Illinois, 422 US 590, 606 , 95 S Ct 2254 , 45 L Ed 2d 416 (1975).

Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Holden

115 Or. App. 390 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 30, 1992

Substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that the knee injury was work-related. … Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Ferrer, 114 Or App 471 , 835 P2d 949 (1992). Employer’s remaining argument does not require discussion. Affirmed.

Consolidated Freightways v. Poelwijk

81 Or. App. 311 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 10, 1986

See Million v. SAIF, 45 Or App 1097, 1102 , 610 P2d 285 , rev den 289 Or 337 (1980). … See State Farm Fire & Cas. v. Reuter, 299 Or 155, 158 , 700 P2d 236 (1985); Million v. SAIF, supra, 45 Or App at 1102 .

Rich v. Employment Division

29 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 4, 1977

Claimants appeal from a decision of the Employment Appeals Board (Board) denying them unemployment compensation on the grounds that their employment was terminated because of a labor dispute. … Wagner v. Employment Div., 28 Or App 857, 860 , 562 P2d 203 (1977). Remanded.

Korbut v. Eastman Kodak Co.

787 P.2d 896 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 7, 1990

787 P.2d 896 (1990) 100 Or.App. 649 Michael KORBUT, Sr., Personal Representative of the Estate of Carolyn Korbut, Deceased, Appellant, v. … Wynn and Haight, Brown and Bonesteel, Santa Monica, California. Before JOSEPH, C.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ. PER CURIAM. This is a wrongful death action based on defective product allegations.

Bank of Newport v. Wages

142 Or. App. 145 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 3, 1996

The Board, although adopting the ALJ’s findings of fact, reversed. … Finally, employer acknowledges that a medical opinion may be sufficient proof of causation even if it does not explicitly *151 employ the “magic words” of “major contributing cause.” 2 See McClendon v.

Munson v. Maass

88 Or. App. 332 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 18, 1987

The second issue is whether the Board was required to notify appellant of his right to judicial review. In Billings v. … The Board is not exempt from the requirements of ORS 183.413. ORS 183.413(2); ORS 183.315(1). The Board erred in not informing appellant of his right to judicial review.

International Paper Company v. Turner

84 Or. App. 248 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 11, 1987

We agree with the Board’s conclusion that claimant has not suffered a new injury so as to support a claim against Bohemia. … See Smith v.

Reynolds Metals v. Mendenhall

133 Or. App. 428 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 8, 1995

Here, as in Weyerhaeuser Co. v. … Drews v. EBI Companies, 310 Or 134, 150-51 , 795 P2d 531 (1990); V. W. Johnson & Sons v. Johnson, 103 Or App 355, 358 , 797 P2d 396 (1990), rev den 311 Or 60 (1991).

Gillette v. Employment Division

34 Or. App. 53 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 8, 1978

The Board reversed, and since there is evidence to support the Board’s findings, we affirm. … What we said in York v.

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Hughes

85 Or. App. 362 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 6, 1987

Pending review by the Board, employer refused to pay interim compensation. … The Board reduced the penalty to reflect the reduced amount of interim compensation that was due on application of the Supreme Court’s decision in Bono v.

Humphrey v. State Accident Insurance Fund

58 Or. App. 360 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 21, 1982

Anfilofieff v. SAIF, 52 Of App 127, 131, 627 P2d 1274 (1981); Crampton v. Bullis, 48 Or App 179, 182 , 616 P2d 562 (1980); Miller v. Granite Construction Co., 28 Or App 473, 477 , 559 P2d 944 (1977). … Hedlund v. SAIF, 55 Or App 313, 637 P2d 1329 (1981); Vader v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 163 Or 492 , 98 P2d 714 (1940).

International Longshore & Warehouse Union, Local 8 v. Port of Portland

279 Or. App. 157 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 22, 2016

Kennedy v. Wheeler, 356 Or 518, 524 , 341 P3d 728 (2014) (quoting State v. Pratt, 316 Or 561, 569 , 853 P2d 827 (1993)); see also Hayes Oyster Co. v. … See Salosha, Inc. v.

Johnsen v. Beacon Electric/Hamilton Electric

117 Or. App. 285 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 23, 1992

We agree with the Board and affirm. The Board found that claimant has been employed as an electrician by the same employer since the 1950’s, when employer’s name was Hamilton Electric Company. … Johnsen v. Hamilton Electric, 90 Or App 161, 165 , 751 P2d 246 (1988). In this claim against Beacon, filed in 1988, claimant alleges that he was exposed to asbestos on the job in 1984, while the first claim was pending.

Rager v. EBI Companies

102 Or. App. 457 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 18, 1990

The Board concluded: “In the present case, Dr. … The Board did not err.

The New Portland Meadows v. Dieringer

157 Or. App. 619 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 16, 1998

The New Portland Meadows (TNPM) moves for reconsideration of our opinion in The New Portland Meadows v. … Reynolds Metals v. Rogers, 157 Or App 147, 153 , 967 P2d 1251 (1998).

Stull v. Hoke

141 Or. App. 150 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 22, 1996

See Allen v. … He relies on Hickey v. OSP, 127 Or App 727 , 874 P2d 102 (1994).