Case law

Cornus Corp. v. Geac Enterprise Solutions, Inc.

252 Or. App. 595 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 3, 2012

Oregon Southwest, LLC v. … In DeNardo v.

Hill v. State Accident Insurance Fund

25 Or. App. 697 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 14, 1976

Closing and Evaluation Division of the Board, referee and Workmen’s Compensation Board had successively awarded 144 degrees for 45 percent unscheduled disability. … Deaton v. SAIF, 13 Or App 298 , 509 P2d 1215 (1973).

Levasseur v. Armon

240 Or. App. 250 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2010

State ex rel. v. Mart, 135 Or 603, 613 , 295 P 459 (1931); see also Hickman v. Six Dimen. Cust. … See, e.g., Glover v.

Choban v. Washington County

124 Or. App. 213 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 3, 1993

In Stroh v. … Co. v.

Interstate Metal v. Gibler

228 Or. App. 180 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 29, 2009

“[I]if there are doctors on both sides of a medical issue, whichever way the Board finds the facts will probably have substantial evidentiary support.” Armstrong v. … See Georgia-Pacific Corp. v.

BASIN TIRE SERVICE, INC. v. Minyard

240 Or. App. 715 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 16, 2011

Corp., Inc. v. Watkins, 347 Or. 687, 690-91 , 227 P.3d 1134 (2010). … See, e.g., Robinson v.

Bremer v. Josephine County

138 Or. App. 511 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 17, 1996

Copies of the petition shall be served by registered or certified mail upon the board, and all other parties of record in the board proceedings.” … Co. v.

State v. Carr

125 Or. App. 270 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 8, 1993

See State v. Shefler, 118 Or App 536 , 847 P2d 417 (1993). We have discretion to review unpreserved errors of law that are apparent on the face of the record. ORAP 5.45(2); Ailes v. … Portland Meadows, Inc., 312 Or 376 , 823 P2d 956 (1991); State v. Brown, 310 Or 347 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). We decline to exercise our discretion to review the error in this case. Affirmed.

Casey v. City of Portland

277 Or. App. 574 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 20, 2016

For the reasons that follow, we conclude that it did. *579 In Drews v. … Shannon v.

Children's Services Division v. Ashman

50 Or. App. 161 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 16, 1981

In our prior decision, Ashman v. … Robbins, [v.

Crumley v. Combustion Engineering

92 Or. App. 439 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 10, 1988

See Cutright v. Weyerhaeuser, 299 Or 290 , 720 P2d 403 (1985); Karr v. SAIF, 79 Or App 250 , 719 P2d 35 , rev den 301 Or 765 (1986). … In Cutright v.

Talevich v. Employment Division

28 Or. App. 735 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 7, 1977

; the Board’s order based upon that conclusion must, therefore, be affirmed. … Cascade Steel v. Employment Div., 26 Or App 863 , 554 P2d 549 , Sup Ct review denied (1976); Wilton v. Employment Div., 26 Or App 549 , 553 P2d 1071 (1976); Grigsby v.

Gainer v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

51 Or. App. 869 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 27, 1981

Bailey v. … Morrison-Knudsen, 5 Or App 592 , 485 P2d 1254 (1971), is on all fours, holding that where an employer appealed a referee’s award to the Board, and the Board reduced the award, but this court thereafter reinstated the earlier

Burris v. SAIF Corp.

116 Or. App. 498 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 18, 1992

SAIF v. Hukari, 113 Or App 475, 480 , 833 P2d 1307 (1992). Claimant also argues that the Board erred when it held that he is making a mental stress claim. … The Board correctly ruled that a stress-caused physical condition is compensable, if at all, under ORS 656.802(l)(b). SAIF v. Hukari, supra, 113 Or App at 480 .

Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Toy

174 Or. App. 275 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 9, 2001

The Workers’ Compensation Board (the Board) set aside employer’s denial of claimant’s occupational disease claim. … In any event, that objection was not raised below, and “[a]n argument that is not raised to the Board is deemed waived.” Roy v. McCormack Pacific Co., 171 Or App 526, 532 , 17 P3d 550 (2000); accord Oregon Lox Co. v.

Liberty Northwest Insurance v. Norton

213 Or. App. 530 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 27, 2007

(employer) petition for judicial review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (board) determining that an audiogram offered by employer did not provide an adequate basis for offsetting claimant’s award for hearing … See SAIF v. Donahue-Birran, 195 Or App 173, 181-83 , 96 P3d 1282 (2004).

Morgan v. Stimson Lumber Co.

38 Or. App. 579 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 20, 1979

Petitioner/employer challenges a Workers’ Compensation Board order that it pay a penalty and attorney fees 1 pursuant to a Board administrative rule. … Newspaper Pub. v. Peterson, 244 Or 116, 123 , 415 P2d 21 (1966). The agency points to no other statute that grants it the authority claimed. Affirmed as modified.

Sheridan v. Johnson Creek Market

149 Or. App. 44 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 2, 1997

Kessler v. Board of Parole, 145 Or App 584, 590 , 931 P2d 801 (1997). No error is apparent on the face of the record. … Those procedural matters were at issue in She0ridan v. Johnson Creek Market, 127 Or App 259 , 873 P2d 328 (1994).

Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Evans

171 Or. App. 569 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 27, 2000

Lockhurst v. Bank of America, 167 Or App 11, 16-17 , 1 P3d 1031 (2000). … Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Crompton, 150 Or App 531, 536 , 946 P2d 1171 (1997).

Compensation of Mavis v. State Accident Insurance Fund

45 Or. App. 1059 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 28, 1980

The Workers’ Compensation Board ordered SAIF to pay claimant temporary total disability (TTD) for about three months of time loss and a 25 percent penalty because of unreasonable denial of his claim. … Candee v. SAIF, 40 Or App 567 , 595 P2d 1381 , den 287 Or 355 (1979).