Case law

Safstrom v. Riedel International, Inc.

65 Or. App. 728 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 30, 1983

Claimant appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) reversing the referee and upholding the employer’s insurance carrier’s partial denial of claimant’s compensation claim. We reverse. … Bauman v.

Alcantar-Baca v. Liberty Northwest Insurance

161 Or. App. 49 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 2, 1999

See Papen v. … Young v.

Jordan v. Brazier Forest Products

152 Or. App. 15 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 7, 1998

The Board and the Department rely on Lankford v. Copeland, 141 Or App 138 , 917 P2d 55 (1996), overruled as to disposition by Oldham v. Plumlee, 151 Or App 402, 404 , 950 P2d 918 (1997), 6 to support their position. … Nothing in Oldham v. Plumlee, 151 Or App 402 , 950 P2d 918 (1997), affected the merits of our decision in Lankford .

Lucky v. State Accident Insurance Fund

27 Or. App. 565 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 29, 1976

Dissatisfied with the Board’s order, claimant appealed to the circuit court. … Compare: Brusco v. B.P. John Furniture, 26 Or App 831 , 554 P2d 562 (1976); Scown v. SAIF, 22 Or App 354 , 539 P2d 160 (1975); Suell v. SAIF, 22. Or App 201, 538 P2d 84 (1975); House v.

Saif Corp. v. St. Clair

134 Or. App. 316 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 17, 1995

Employer argues that because of that, the Board erred in imposing a penalty here. The Board concluded that it was required by the statute to impose a penalty. … PGE v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 317 Or 606 , 859 P2d 1143 (1993).

Cascade Corporation v. Rose

92 Or. App. 663 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 24, 1988

However, as explained in Boise Cascade Corp. v. … Forney v. Western States Plywood, 297 Or 628 , 686 P2d 1027 (1984). In Petshow *668 v. Farm Bureau Ins.

Bremer v. Josephine County

138 Or. App. 511 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 17, 1996

Copies of the petition shall be served by registered or certified mail upon the board, and all other parties of record in the board proceedings.” … Co. v.

Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc.

144 Or. App. 52 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 9, 1996

Viewed most favorably to plaintiffs, Brown v. J. C. … nail into the board.

SAIF Corp. v. Smith

177 Or. App. 504 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 31, 2001

ORS 183.482(8); Iles v. Fred Meyer, Inc., 173 Or App 254, 258 , 21 P3d 195 (2001). Substantial evidence supports the Board’s conclusion that claimant suffered an injury for purposes of ORS 656.005(7)(a). In K-Mart v. … SAIF further argues that there are no objective findings, i.e., “verifiable indications of injury,” ORS 656.005(19), to support the Board’s conclusion. We disagree. In SAIF v.

Gainer v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

51 Or. App. 869 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 27, 1981

Bailey v. … Morrison-Knudsen, 5 Or App 592 , 485 P2d 1254 (1971), is on all fours, holding that where an employer appealed a referee’s award to the Board, and the Board reduced the award, but this court thereafter reinstated the earlier

Stewart v. City of Salem

231 Or. App. 356 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 14, 2009

As we noted in Gisler v. … See Holland v. City of Cannon Beach, 323 Or 148 , 915 P2d 407 (1996); Reusser v. Washington County, 122 Or App 33 , 857 P2d 183 , rev den 318 Or 60 (1993).”

City of Medford v. Budge-McHugh Supply Co.

91 Or. App. 213 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 18, 1988

State Land Board v. Lee, supra, 84 Or at 434 . … As the Supreme Court explained in State Land Board v.

Thompson v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

51 Or. App. 395 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 30, 1981

In this workers’ compensation case, claimant appeals an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) which affirmed the hearing referee’s denial of claimant’s occupational disease claim. ORS 656.802(l)(a). … In James v.

Arndt v. National Appliance Co.

74 Or. App. 20 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 5, 1985

ORS 656.206(1)(a); Livesay v. *26 SAIF, 55 Or App 390 , 637 P2d 1370 (1981); Butcher v. SAIF, 45 Or App 313 , 608 P2d 575 (1980). … Gettman v. SAIF, 289 Or 609 , 616 P2d 473 (1980).

Johnson v. SAIF Corp.

202 Or. App. 264 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 19, 2005

The Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed the ALJ’s decision. This court ultimately affirmed the board without opinion. Johnson v. SAIF, 200 Or App 414 , 115 P3d 988 (2005). … Benning v. Board of Regents of Regency University, 928 F2d 775, 777 (7th Cir 1991). The Ninth Circuit describes the test in terms of five factors. Eaglesmith v. Ward, 73 F3d 857 (9th Cir 1996).

SAIF Corp. v. Pendergast-Long

152 Or. App. 780 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 25, 1998

The Board reaffirmed its decision in a December 1996 order on reconsideration. … As support for its argument, SAIF relies on our decision in SAIF v.

State v. Haynes

168 Or. App. 565 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 28, 2000

The state argues that, under our decision in State v. … Ballot Measure 40 later was declared unconstitutional in Armatta v.

Poland v. SAIF

303 Or. App. 665 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 22, 2020

665 203 Poland v. … Co. v.

Briggs v. State Accident Insurance Fund

36 Or. App. 709 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 30, 1978

Based upon that analysis, the Board inexplicably awarded 30 percent low back disability. The circuit court reversed the Board and reinstated the referee’s award without explanation. … Burks v. Western Irrigation, 36 Or App 587 , 586 P2d 788 (1978); Wilson v. Weyerhaeuser, 30 Or App 403 , 567 P2d 567 (1977); Deaton v. SAIF, 13 Or App 298 , 509 P2d 1215 (1973).

Elvin v. Oregon Public Employees Union

102 Or. App. 159 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 13, 1990

Oregon Public Employees Union (OPEU) seeks review of an order of the Employment Relations Board (ERB). … See Tierney v. City of Toledo, 824 F2d 1497 (6th Cir 1987); Gibney v. Toledo Bd. of Educ., 40 Ohio St 3d 152, 532 NE 2d 1300 (1988); Lowary v. Lexington Local Bd. of Educ., 854 F2d 131 (6th Cir 1988); Gilpin v.