Case law

Smith v. Department of Corrections

276 Or. App. 862 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 9, 2016

See Smith v. … In Wehrman v.

A & X, Inc. v. Common Council of Eugene

41 Or. App. 171 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 16, 1979

See Maizels v. Kozer, 129 Or 100 , 276 P 277 (1929); Williams v. Henry, 70 Or 466 , 142 P 377 (1914); Thompson v. Columbia County Comm’rs, 29 Or *175 App 813 , 564 P2d 1376 (1977); Shanks v. … Center v. City Council, 20 Or App 234 , 531 P2d 284 , rev den (1975).

State v. Lewis

306 Or. App. 492 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 16, 2020

Bunch, 305 Or App at 67 (citing State v. Brown, 348 Or 293, 302, 232 P3d 962 (2010)). … Like the defendant in Brown, 502 State v.

State v. Allen

312 Or. App. 584 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 30, 2021

See State v. … State v.

Robertson v. Davcol, Inc.

99 Or. App. 542 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 6, 1989

Plaintiff brought suit against Defendants in the Circuit Court for Multnomah County, Oregon, entitled Robertson v. McKay, et al., Civil No. A8609-05668. “2. … SAIF then petitioned the Board to determine its “just and proper” distribution.

State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Belcher

71 Or. App. 502 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 19, 1984

The Board affirmed. … ORS 656.005(9); 656.245(1); Milbradt v. SAIF, 62 Or App 530 , 661 P2d 584 (1983); Wetzel v. Goodwin Brothers, 50 Or App 101 , 622 P2d 750 (1981).

Cooper v. Oregon School Activities Ass'n

52 Or. App. 425 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 26, 1981

An appeal filed with OSAA’s Board of Control was also denied. … School District v.

Cascade Forest Products, Inc. v. Accident Prevention Division

60 Or. App. 255 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 10, 1982

Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order by a Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) referee affirming two safety citations issued by the Accident Prevention Division (APD). … Wasson v.

Nicholson v. Clatsop County

148 Or. App. 528 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 25, 1997

We addressed a similar contention in Reeves v. Yamhill County, 132 Or App 263 , 888 P2d 79 (1995). … See also Fasano v. Washington Co. Comm., 264 Or 574 , 507 P2d 23 (1973). We find that all of petitioner’s arguments are wholly without merit.

Staffing Services, Inc. v. Kalaveras

241 Or. App. 130 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 23, 2011

In Karjalainen v. … After this case was submitted, in Hopkins v.

State v. Walker

68 Or. App. 561 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 6, 1984

In State v. … Citing State v.

Elixir Industries v. Lange

100 Or. App. 492 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 14, 1990

See, e.g., McGarry v. SAIF, 24 Or App 883 (1976). … That construction of the statute and the rule is persuasive, and we have no reason to differ from the Board’s interpretation. See 1000 Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Lane Co.), 305 Or 384, 389-92 , 752 P2d 271 (1988).

Bracke v. Baza'r, Inc.

78 Or. App. 128 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 26, 1986

Because the Board’s reduction of the penalty award was based on its erroneous holding that claimant had become medically stationary, we hold that the Board erred in reducing the penalty. See Hedlund v. … We have held that it is an *137 error for the Board to reduce attorney fees based on an erroneous reduction of TTD. Hedlund v. SAIF, supra, 55 Or App at 318 .

Larsen v. Taylor & Co.

56 Or. App. 404 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 22, 1982

ORS 262.268(2), (3) The order of the Board is reversed, and the referee’s order is reinstated. It is clear that the Board can reach issues not raised by the parties. Russell v. … A & D Terminals, 50 Or App 27, 31 , 621 P2d 1221 (1981); Neely v. SAIF, 43 Or App 319, 323-24 , 602 P2d 1101 (1979), rev den 288 Or 493 (1980).

Ous v. Opeu

60 P.3d 567 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 2002

On that point, our observation in Vanderselt v. … See Pacific First Bank v.

SAIF Corp. v. Hansen

126 Or. App. 662 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 9, 1994

Relying on Camlu Retirement Center v. Evenhus, 102 Or App 603 , 795 P2d 606 (1990), and Oak Crest Care Center v. … The Board reversed the referee, holding that employer was barred from denying the claim retroactively when the effect would be to leave the claimant without benefits. Garcia v.

Timm v. Maley

134 Or. App. 245 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 10, 1995

Steven Timm, the noncomplying employer (Timm (NCE)), seeks review of the Workers’ Compensation Board’s order, entered after we remanded for reconsideration, Timm v. … See Industrial Indemnity Co. v.

State v. Denny

27 Or. App. 455 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 22, 1976

State v. Johnson, Wesson, 26 Or App 599 , 554 P2d 194 (1976). … all those with brown shoes should be stopped.”

Timm v. Maley

125 Or. App. 396 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 22, 1993

Citing Bracke v. … However, we have addressed that question in at least three cases: SAIF v. Luhrs, 63 Or App 78 , 663 P2d 418 (1983); SAIF v. Harris, 63 Or App 256 , 663 P2d 1307 , rev den 295 Or 730 (1983); and SAIF v.

State v. Sannes

218 Or. App. 728 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 19, 2008

State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 445 , 687 P2d 751 (1984) (evidence of polygraph examination is inadmissible in a criminal trial). Reversed and remanded.